prabowo - Sugramedia
Home Tags Posts tagged with "prabowo"
Tag:

prabowo

Technology and Gadgets

Prabowo Panggil Menhaj dan Wamenhaj ke Istana Bahas BPIH 2027

by Ali Ikhwan
written by Ali Ikhwan

President Prabowo Subianto summoned Minister of Hajj and Umrah Mochamad Irfan Yusuf, widely known as Gus Irfan, alongside Deputy Minister of Hajj and Umrah Dahnil Anzar Simanjuntak, to the Presidential Palace in Jakarta on Monday, September 28, 2026. The high-level meeting was primarily convened to discuss the ongoing preparation and development of the Cost of Hajj Pilgrimage (Biaya Penyelenggaraan Ibadah Haji or BPIH) for the 1448 Hijriah / 2027 Gregorian pilgrimage season.

The strategic consultation underscores the administration’s proactive stance on managing the immense logistical, financial, and regulatory frameworks required to facilitate millions of Indonesian citizens traveling to the Holy Land. As Indonesia remains the country with the largest annual contingent of Hajj pilgrims globally, ensuring financial transparency, operational efficiency, and affordability remains a paramount priority for the national government.

Strategic Consultations at the Presidential Palace

During the briefing at the Presidential Palace, Minister Irfan Yusuf delivered a comprehensive progress report to President Prabowo Subianto concerning the current trajectory of the BPIH 2027 formulations. The discussions encompassed various fiscal components, including airline ticketing, accommodation rates in Makkah and Medina, catering services, health services, and currency exchange rate fluctuations that heavily influence the overall cost structure borne by prospective pilgrims.

Furthermore, the Minister of Hajj and Umrah sought direct directives from the head of state regarding the legislative progression of the Hajj Financial Management Bill (Undang-Undang Pengelolaan Keuangan Haji), which is presently navigating through deliberation processes within the House of Representatives (DPR). The integration between the executive branch’s execution strategies and the legislative branch’s regulatory oversight is deemed critical to establishing a resilient and sustainable financial ecosystem for future pilgrimages.

Speaking to members of the media following the closed-door meeting, Gus Irfan highlighted the multifaceted nature of the discussions. "We reported on the progress of the BPIH discussions, the Cost of Hajj Pilgrimage. Additionally, because the Hajj Financial Management Law is currently being processed in the DPR, we are expecting the President’s direct directives concerning this matter," stated Gus Irfan to reporters stationed at the Presidential Complex.

Timeline and Legislative Deliberations

The preparation cycle for any given Hajj season requires meticulous planning that spans nearly a year in advance. According to the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah, formal deliberations regarding the BPIH 2027 alongside the Working Committee (Panja) of the House of Representatives have been actively underway for nearly a month. These deliberations involve rigorous auditing, comparative studies of past logistical expenditures, and negotiations with service providers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Despite the intensive nature of these discussions, the Ministry has not yet announced a definitive official figure or baseline cost for the 2027 pilgrimage. Government officials emphasize that final pricing must balance economic realities—such as global inflation and currency valuations—with the affordability and financial accessibility for everyday Indonesian families, many of whom save for decades to fulfill their religious obligations.

The parallel legislative track involving the Hajj Financial Management Bill adds another layer of complexity. Lawmakers and executive officials are aiming to refine the legal parameters governing how Hajj funds are invested, managed, and distributed to ensure optimal returns while maintaining absolute security for pilgrim deposits managed by the Hajj Financial Management Agency (BPKH).

Background Context and Institutional Evolution

The urgency surrounding Hajj management reforms in Indonesia reflects structural changes within the government. In recent years, the administration recognized the necessity of elevating Hajj and Umrah affairs from a standard directorate-general within the Ministry of Religious Affairs to a dedicated, standalone ministry. This institutional transformation was designed to streamline bureaucracy, enhance diplomatic coordination with Saudi Arabian authorities, and drastically improve the welfare of Indonesian pilgrims abroad.

Historically, determining the BPIH has been a delicate political and social process in Indonesia. The cost is divided into two primary components: the direct costs paid by the individual pilgrim (Bipih) and the indirect costs subsidized from the value-generation (nilai manfaat) of accumulated Hajj funds managed on behalf of waiting pilgrims. Striking a sustainable balance between these two financial pools has become increasingly challenging as the subsidization model faces long-term fiscal sustainability questions, prompting the current administration to push for comprehensive legislative reforms.

Recent Regulatory and Service Enforcement Actions

In tandem with macro-level financial planning, the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah has maintained a stringent posture regarding service quality and consumer protection for Indonesian religious travelers. Just prior to the presidential summon, Deputy Minister Dahnil Anzar Simanjuntak made headlines by taking decisive action against substandard practices within the industry.

Following a viral incident on social media wherein an Umrah guide publicly humiliated elderly Indonesian pilgrims, the Ministry swiftly intervened. Deputy Minister Dahnil Anzar announced a strict punitive measure, declaring that the offending guide would be permanently blacklisted from operating within the sector. This enforcement action illustrates the new leadership’s zero-tolerance policy toward abuses of authority and substandard treatment of vulnerable citizens, reinforcing the ministry’s broader mandate to protect pilgrims across both mandatory Hajj and voluntary Umrah journeys.

Implications of the BPIH 2027 Preparations

The decisions emerging from the current round of executive consultations and legislative debates will carry profound implications for millions of Indonesian Muslims. As the global economic landscape fluctuates, maintaining predictable and fair Hajj costs is vital for social stability and public trust.

By engaging President Prabowo directly at this early stage, the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah aims to secure unified political backing, pre-empt bureaucratic bottlenecks, and ensure that the final structural framework for BPIH 2027 meets high standards of accountability, transparency, and public welfare. As the Panja DPR deliberations continue in the coming weeks, attention will remain focused on whether the government can successfully optimize costs without compromising the quality and safety of the pilgrimage experience in Saudi Arabia.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sports and Fitness

FIFA President Gianni Infantino Set to Visit Indonesia to Meet President Prabowo and Attend FIFA ASEAN Cup 2026 Final in Jakarta

by Asro
written by Asro

The global governing body of association football, FIFA, is maintaining its strong diplomatic and structural focus on Southeast Asia as preparations intensify for a landmark sporting visit. FIFA President Gianni Infantino is officially scheduled to arrive in Indonesia in early October 2026. This high-profile diplomatic and athletic mission serves a dual purpose: holding strategic discussions at the highest level of the Indonesian government with President Prabowo Subianto, and personally witnessing the climactic conclusion of the inaugural FIFA ASEAN Cup 2026.

The announcement, which underscores Indonesia’s growing prominence in international football administration and event hosting, was officially confirmed by Football Association of Indonesia (PSSI) Chairman Erick Thohir. According to the updated itinerary, Infantino’s visit will span two critical days, centering on Jakarta as the focal point of regional football diplomacy.

High-Level State Diplomacy: Meeting with President Prabowo Subianto

The cornerstone of Gianni Infantino’s working visit to Jakarta is an audience with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, scheduled for October 4, 2026. While the specific agenda items remain broad, discussions between the FIFA President and the Indonesian head of state are expected to revolve around the ongoing transformation of Indonesian football, government-backed infrastructure developments, and the long-term strategic partnership between the state and the international governing body.

Since the establishment of the permanent FIFA office in Jakarta—a collaborative milestone born out of post-tragedy infrastructure rehabilitation and youth development initiatives—relations between FIFA and the Indonesian government have reached unprecedented levels of coordination. President Prabowo’s administration has continued to prioritize sports diplomacy and grassroots infrastructure modernization, making the meeting with Infantino a vital checkpoint for evaluating the nation’s readiness to host major international fixtures.

Furthermore, the conversation is anticipated to touch upon the broader geopolitical landscape of ASEAN football. With Indonesia acting as the pioneer host for the region’s first major FIFA-sanctioned standalone tournament, the government’s continued backing is viewed by Zurich headquarters as essential for regional stability and developmental sustainability.

The Grand Finale: Climax of the FIFA ASEAN Cup 2026 at SUGBK

Following his state engagements, Infantino will transition his focus strictly to the pitch on October 5, 2026. The FIFA President is scheduled to attend the high-stakes final of the Division 1 FIFA ASEAN Cup 2026, which will take place at the iconic Stadion Utama Gelora Bung Karno (SUGBK) in Senayan, Jakarta.

The tournament, running from September 24 to October 5, 2026, marks a historic chapter in international football. It represents the very first major, comprehensive tournament organized directly by FIFA specifically tailored for the Southeast Asian region. By pooling the competitive strengths of ASEAN nations into a unified, high-visibility platform, FIFA aims to elevate the technical standards, commercial value, and global competitiveness of Southeast Asian football.

Gianni Infantino Akan Datang ke Indonesia, Temui Prabowo dan Saksikan Final FIFA ASEAN Cup

PSSI Chairman Erick Thohir highlighted the inclusive nature of the closing ceremony and the final match, noting that the event will serve as a gathering point for regional leadership. "On October 5, 2026, here in Jakarta, we are inviting several presidents of ASEAN federations and other Asian confederation counterparts to join us, alongside celebrating the tournament’s official closing and final showdown," Thohir stated.

The presence of regional federation heads emphasizes the diplomatic dimension of the tournament’s conclusion. It transforms the SUGBK into a temporary capital of Asian football diplomacy, where regional stakeholders can evaluate the success of the pilot tournament and discuss future iterations.

Foundation Laid by FIFA Secretary General Mattias Grafstrom

Infantino’s impending arrival builds directly upon the groundwork laid during the opening stages of the tournament. FIFA Secretary General Mattias Grafstrom arrived in Jakarta ahead of schedule to oversee the tournament’s inauguration and attended the grand opening ceremony held at SUGBK on September 25, 2026.

Grafstrom’s early presence allowed the executive leadership of international football to inspect facilities, review security protocols, and experience firsthand the legendary passion of Indonesian supporters. During his address in Jakarta, Grafstrom offered high praise for the logistical efficiency and operational excellence demonstrated by the PSSI under Thohir’s leadership.

"I am truly delighted to be here alongside my good friend, PSSI President Erick Thohir. I want to express my deepest gratitude for the extraordinary work that you and your entire team have undertaken to bring this tournament to life," Grafstrom remarked during a press briefing in the Indonesian capital.

The FIFA Secretary General also took specific note of the tight scheduling constraints under which the tournament was organized, commending the local organizing committee for executing a seamless operational rollout. Beyond administrative success, Grafstrom expressed profound admiration for the fervent football culture deeply embedded in Indonesian society.

Highlighting the massive turnout expected for marquee fixtures—such as the fierce regional rivalry matches that drew crowds exceeding 50,000 spectators to the stands of SUGBK—Grafstrom emphasized that the tournament serves as a testament to the nation’s unwavering devotion to the sport. "The timeline was undoubtedly tight, but I am exceptionally eager to witness these matches, which are projected to draw over 50,000 passionate fans. This kind of turnout undeniably showcases Indonesia’s profound and unmatched enthusiasm for football," he added.

Security and Logistical Preparations for Regional Blockbusters

The massive influx of regional visitors, traveling delegations, and passionate supporters has necessitated unprecedented security and logistical mobilization by local authorities. Prior to the tournament’s kickoff, security forces—including specialized units from the Mobile Brigade (Brimob) of the Metro Jaya Regional Police—conducted extensive sterilizations and security sweeps across the entire SUGBK complex.

Gianni Infantino Akan Datang ke Indonesia, Temui Prabowo dan Saksikan Final FIFA ASEAN Cup

The high-profile nature of matches, particularly encounters involving historic regional rivals such as the clashes between Indonesia and Malaysia, has drawn thousands of traveling supporters, including hundreds of members of supporter groups like the ‘Harimau Malaya’ contingent. In response, local law enforcement agencies deployed specialized security protocols, segregated seating arrangements, and dedicated escort details to ensure a safe, family-friendly environment for all international and domestic attendees.

These rigorous safety measures reflect the lessons learned from past administrative hurdles, signaling to the global football community that Indonesia has established a world-class standard for event safety, crowd management, and international hospitality.

Broader Economic, Sporting, and Strategic Implications

The hosting of the FIFA ASEAN Cup 2026 and the subsequent high-level visit by Gianni Infantino carry profound implications for Indonesian football and the country’s international standing.

From a sporting perspective, a tournament of this magnitude provides Southeast Asian national teams with invaluable exposure to elite-tier competition, structured refereeing standards, and high-intensity match environments. For Indonesian players, performing under the watchful eyes of FIFA’s highest executives inside a packed SUGBK offers a premier showcase for potential international scouting and career advancement.

Economically, the tournament acts as a major catalyst for Jakarta’s tourism, hospitality, and service sectors. The convergence of regional fans, international media, and global football executives generates substantial economic activity, reinforcing the government’s narrative that sports tourism is a viable and lucrative pillar of national development.

Diplomatically, the visit solidifies Indonesia’s reputation as a reliable and capable partner for international sports organizations. Having successfully navigated previous periods of administrative restructuring and stadium safety overhauls, Indonesia has transitioned from a subject of international scrutiny to a trusted model for regional football governance.

As the countdown to October 4 and 5 continues, all eyes remain fixed on Jakarta. The convergence of presidential-level statecraft, regional sports diplomacy, and the crowning of the first-ever champion of the FIFA ASEAN Cup 2026 marks a watershed moment—not only for Indonesian football, but for the future trajectory of the sport across the entire Southeast Asian landscape.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business and Finance

Revitalizing Indonesia’s Textile Industry: President Prabowo’s Strategic Push and the Critical Role of BPI Danantara in Economic Transformation

by Rifan Muazin
written by Rifan Muazin

The Indonesian government under the leadership of President Prabowo Subianto has embarked on an ambitious and comprehensive mission to revitalize the nation’s textile and garment manufacturing sector. This strategic push is designed not merely to rescue a legacy industry from structural decline, but to fundamentally reshape Indonesia’s broader manufacturing landscape, enhance global competitiveness, expand large-scale employment opportunities, and fortify national production capacities. The initiative unfolds against a complex backdrop of mounting global trade pressures, shifting international supply chains, volatile production costs, and changing consumer demands, all of which have converged to necessitate urgent technological modernization across the domestic industrial ecosystem.

The Historical Significance and Current Vulnerabilities of the Textile Sector

For decades, the textile and apparel sector has served as a cornerstone of Indonesia’s industrialization strategy. As one of the country’s earliest manufacturing segments to scale, it historically provided a vital pathway for integrating millions of workers—predominantly women—into the formal economy, moving them away from agrarian livelihoods and into urban manufacturing centers. Furthermore, the sector has traditionally been a significant net exporter, generating vital foreign exchange and fostering a complex web of supporting domestic industries, ranging from logistics and packaging to chemical processing and cotton farming.

However, in recent years, the sector has encountered severe structural headwinds. The rapid digitalization of global retail, coupled with intense price competition from overseas manufacturers operating with heavily subsidized energy and advanced automated infrastructure, has squeezed profit margins for Indonesian producers. Domestically, aging machinery—some of it dating back several decades—has constrained operational efficiency and limited the ability of local factories to meet stringent international quality and sustainability standards. Moreover, fluctuations in raw material prices, rising domestic minimum wages, and stringent regulatory frameworks have placed immense cost pressures on factory operators, leading in some instances to facility closures, capacity downsizing, and workforce layoffs.

Recognizing these vulnerabilities, the administration of President Prabowo has identified the textile industry as a critical testing ground for supply chain resilience. The overarching goal is to transition the sector away from low-cost, high-volume contract manufacturing toward higher-value-added segments, sustainable production practices, and advanced technical textiles. Achieving this transition requires coordinated policy interventions, targeted financial injections, and institutional alignment across multiple branches of government.

The Strategic Intervention of BPI Danantara

At the heart of the government’s financial mobilization strategy for the industrial sector is the newly established Badan Pengelola Investasi Daya Anagata Nusantara (BPI Danantara). Conceived as Indonesia’s sovereign super-holding investment agency, Danantara is designed to consolidate state-owned enterprise assets and direct strategic capital toward high-impact national development projects. In the context of the textile industry revitalization, Danantara’s involvement marks a departure from traditional, short-term bureaucratic subsidies toward long-term, value-driven equity investments.

Economic analysts and industry observers have closely scrutinized the mandate of Danantara under the leadership of CEO Rosan Roeslani. The agency’s strategic focus is expected to go beyond simply injecting emergency liquidity into struggling factories. Instead, Danantara’s deployment of capital is intended to catalyze structural reforms within targeted manufacturing operations, ensuring that state-backed investments yield measurable improvements in productivity, energy efficiency, and technological readiness.

Dr. Sarlina Sari, an academic and researcher from the Faculty of Economics and Business at Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika (UBSI), emphasizes that government intervention in the textile sector must be viewed through a macro-economic lens. According to Dr. Sarlina, a doctoral graduate from the prestigious Faculty of Economics and Business at Universitas Indonesia (FEB UI), the textile industry’s health is deeply intertwined with regional economic stability and domestic consumption patterns.

"Industri tekstil memiliki posisi penting dalam perjalanan industrialisasi Indonesia," Dr. Sarlina noted in a recent policy analysis statement. "Selain berkontribusi terhadap kegiatan produksi dan ekspor, sektor ini memiliki keterkaitan dengan penyerapan tenaga kerja, industri pendukung, serta aktivitas ekonomi di berbagai daerah." Translated to the broader economic context, the sector’s multiplier effect extends far beyond the factory floor, supporting small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that supply buttons, threads, dyes, and transport services.

Financial Mechanics and Investment Priorities

For BPI Danantara and its institutional partners, the primary challenge lies in structuring investments that generate sustainable returns while addressing the systemic deficits of the textile ecosystem. Financial experts point out that capital allocation must be strictly disciplined and performance-based.

According to Dr. Sarlina, investment in the textile industry should not be measured merely by the volume of capital disbursed, but by the tangible transformations it produces. "Investasi terhadap industri tekstil tidak cukup hanya diarahkan untuk meningkatkan kapasitas produksi," she stated. "Dukungan terhadap industri tekstil akan semakin berarti apabila diarahkan pada modernisasi teknologi, penguatan rantai pasok, peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia, dan pengembangan pasar ekspor."

This multi-pronged investment framework prioritizes several key areas:

  1. Technological Modernization and Digitalization: A significant portion of the capital must be earmarked for replacing outdated analog looms and sewing machines with computer-controlled, automated machinery. Industry 4.0 applications—such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors for predictive maintenance, automated cutting systems, and digital inventory management—are essential for reducing waste, optimizing energy consumption, and lowering per-unit production costs.
  2. Supply Chain Integration: To reduce dependence on imported synthetic fibers and raw cotton, investments are needed to strengthen domestic upstream and midstream capabilities. Developing integrated textile parks that house spinning, weaving, dyeing, and garment-making facilities in close geographic proximity can drastically reduce logistics costs and lead times.
  3. Human Capital Development: Advanced machinery requires a skilled workforce. Investment programs must incorporate comprehensive vocational training initiatives in collaboration with educational institutions and industry associations. Workers must be trained in machine operation, quality control, apparel design software, and sustainable manufacturing protocols.
  4. Export Market Diversification and Value Addition: While traditional markets in North America and Western Europe remain crucial, Indonesian exporters must adapt to tightening environmental regulations, such as the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and circular economy mandates. Investments should support the adoption of eco-friendly dyes, organic cotton processing, and certified sustainable production lines that appeal to conscious global consumers.

Broader Implications for Indonesia’s Manufacturing Sector

The revitalization of the textile industry under President Prabowo’s administration holds broader implications for Indonesia’s ambition to escape the middle-income trap and achieve advanced economy status by 2045. As global supply chains undergo continuous reconfiguration—driven by geopolitical tensions, trade diversification strategies, and the "China plus one" sourcing model—Indonesia possesses a unique window of opportunity to capture displaced manufacturing orders.

However, capturing this market share requires resolving long-standing structural bottlenecks that have historically plagued Indonesia’s ease of doing business rankings. High logistics costs, complex labor regulations, fragmented energy infrastructure, and non-tariff trade barriers have often deterred foreign direct investment (FDI) in labor-intensive manufacturing compared to regional neighbors like Vietnam and Bangladesh.

By deploying BPI Danantara as a strategic catalyst, the government aims to de-risk investments in the manufacturing sector, signalling to international institutional investors and private equity funds that Indonesia is serious about industrial upgrading. Furthermore, a successful turnaround in the textile sector could serve as a replicable blueprint for other labor-intensive manufacturing industries, such as footwear, furniture, and electronics assembly.

Looking Ahead: Implementation and Accountability

As the revitalization program transitions from policy formulation to ground-level implementation, monitoring and accountability mechanisms will be paramount. Industry stakeholders, labor unions, and economic analysts will be watching closely to ensure that state-backed funds achieve their intended targets without creating market distortions or moral hazards for inefficient corporate operators.

The alignment between the executive branch’s policy directives, Danantara’s investment execution capabilities, and the academic insights provided by institutions like UBSI and FEB UI underscores a collaborative approach to national economic planning. If executed with strategic precision, the modernization of Indonesia’s textile industry could secure millions of formal jobs, revitalize regional economies, and re-establish the nation as a formidable powerhouse in global textile and apparel manufacturing.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Politics and Governance

Prabowo Subianto Orders Immediate Correction of Regional Regulations Allowing Small-Scale Land Burning

by Evan Lee Salim
written by Evan Lee Salim

President Prabowo Subianto has issued a stern directive to local government officials, demanding the immediate revocation of eight regional regulations (Peraturan Daerah or Perda) that permit the burning of up to two hectares of land. During a high-level coordination meeting focused on the mitigation of forest and land fires (Karhutla) held at the Presidential Palace in Jakarta on Thursday, September 24, 2026, the President emphasized that such legal loopholes serve as primary catalysts for uncontrollable environmental disasters, particularly in vulnerable peatland regions.

The President’s instruction marks a significant shift in national policy, signaling a transition from localized, lenient agricultural practices toward a more centralized and uncompromising approach to environmental preservation. By labeling the existing regulations as both "nonsense" and "deceptive," the administration has signaled that the era of tolerating "small-scale" burning as a traditional farming method is coming to an end.

The Dangers of the Two-Hectare Loophole

For years, certain regional administrations in Indonesia have maintained regulations that allow local farmers to clear up to two hectares of land using fire, provided they notify local authorities and adhere to specific safety protocols. Proponents of these rules have historically argued that this provides smallholder farmers with a low-cost, effective method for land preparation.

Prabowo Geram Ada Perda Bolehkan Bakar Lahan 2 Hektare: Nonsanse, Ini Menipu!

However, President Prabowo challenged the logic behind this, noting that in the context of Indonesia’s geography—particularly the highly flammable peatlands—the notion of "controlled" burning is a fallacy. During the meeting, he posed a rhetorical question to the experts present: "If one person burns two hectares, how do you stop that fire? It is impossible for a single individual to contain a fire that quickly covers an area equivalent to a football field. It is logically inconsistent to permit an activity that carries such a high risk of systemic destruction."

The President’s assessment is supported by environmental scientists who point out that peatland fires do not merely burn the surface; they penetrate deep into the carbon-rich soil, creating underground hotspots that can smolder for weeks or months. These subterranean fires are notoriously difficult to extinguish, often resurfacing miles away from the initial site of ignition, which renders the "two-hectare limit" practically irrelevant once the blaze becomes established.

A Chronology of Escalating Concerns

The issue of Karhutla has been a recurring crisis in Indonesia, with significant spikes occurring throughout the 2020s. The timeline of this year’s crisis reflects the urgency behind the President’s recent statements:

  • Early August 2026: Meteorological services reported an early onset of the dry season, compounded by the Indian Ocean Dipole effect, leading to heightened fire risks across Kalimantan and Sumatra.
  • September 9, 2026: Authorities in Siak, Riau, successfully prosecuted four individuals for illegal land clearing, highlighting the ongoing tension between law enforcement and local agricultural practices.
  • September 13, 2026: The Head of the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), Suharyanto, issued a public warning, urging citizens not to hide behind regional regulations to justify land burning, asserting that state-level environmental protection mandates supersede local ordinances.
  • September 23, 2026: A major scandal broke in Mempawah, where an elected member of the regional legislative council (DPRD) was linked to land clearing for palm oil cultivation via fire, triggering a police investigation and a public outcry.
  • September 24, 2026: President Prabowo convenes the emergency coordination meeting at the Presidential Palace, where he officially calls for the correction of the eight identified regency-level Perdas.

Supporting Data and Environmental Impact

The environmental stakes of this policy shift are immense. Indonesia holds some of the world’s largest tropical peatland carbon stocks. When these areas are burned, they release massive amounts of carbon dioxide, contributing significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions. According to satellite monitoring data from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, over 60% of fire hotspots detected in recent years have been traced back to areas where land clearing was being prepared for monoculture plantations, such as oil palm or timber.

Prabowo Geram Ada Perda Bolehkan Bakar Lahan 2 Hektare: Nonsanse, Ini Menipu!

While proponents of the current laws claim that smallholder farmers are being unfairly targeted, economic analysis suggests that the cumulative impact of thousands of "two-hectare fires" creates a regional haze that disrupts public health, aviation, and cross-border relations. During the 2015 and 2019 fire crises, the economic losses for Indonesia were estimated to be in the tens of billions of dollars, stemming from healthcare costs due to respiratory illnesses, school closures, and the loss of tourism and trade revenue.

Official Responses and Legal Challenges

The directive from President Prabowo places local governments in a difficult position. Regencies that have codified these burning practices into law must now navigate the legal process of repealing or amending their ordinances to align with national environmental standards.

Legal experts note that the hierarchy of laws in Indonesia dictates that local regulations cannot contradict national laws, including the Environmental Protection and Management Law. By identifying these eight specific Perdas, the President has essentially put these local administrations on notice. Failure to comply could lead to the central government taking direct administrative action, potentially through the Ministry of Home Affairs, which holds the authority to annul regional regulations that are deemed to be in violation of higher-level legislation or detrimental to the public interest.

The National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) and the police have welcomed the President’s stance. For law enforcement agencies, the "two-hectare loophole" has long been a significant hurdle in prosecuting arsonists. Often, suspects would present the regional regulation as a defense in court, claiming their actions were authorized by local law, even if the fire spread far beyond their property boundaries. Clarifying that no such loophole exists will streamline the judicial process and provide police with the mandate to enforce a "zero-burning" policy across the archipelago.

Prabowo Geram Ada Perda Bolehkan Bakar Lahan 2 Hektare: Nonsanse, Ini Menipu!

Broader Implications for Sustainable Agriculture

The shift away from fire-based land clearing is expected to accelerate the government’s push for "Zero Burning" agricultural technology. The government has signaled that it intends to increase support for smallholders by providing access to mechanized clearing equipment and training in non-fire land preparation techniques.

However, the transition will not be without its challenges. Smallholder farmers often cite the high cost of manual labor and the unavailability of machinery as the primary reasons they rely on fire. Addressing the systemic causes of these fires requires more than just a change in regulation; it requires a robust economic strategy that makes sustainable farming more profitable and accessible than the "slash-and-burn" method.

As the government moves to strike down these eight Perdas, the focus will now shift to the implementation phase. Environmental NGOs have lauded the move as a long-overdue step toward fulfilling Indonesia’s climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. Yet, they caution that enforcement must be applied uniformly, ensuring that not only small-scale farmers but also large-scale plantation operators are held accountable for their role in the fire crisis.

President Prabowo’s firm stance marks a pivotal moment in Indonesia’s environmental governance. By removing the legal cover that has protected fire-based land clearing for years, the administration is betting that a stricter regulatory environment, combined with better support for sustainable farming, will finally break the cycle of seasonal haze that has plagued the nation for decades. The coming months will be a test of how effectively these central directives can be translated into action at the regency level, and whether the country can finally move toward a fire-free future for its vital peatland ecosystems.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
National News

Pakar Ekonomi Soroti Kebijakan Investasi dan Lapangan Kerja Pemerintahan Prabowo-Gibran di Tengah Dinamika Global

by Neng Nana
written by Neng Nana

JAKARTA — Economic experts have placed the economic policy trajectory of the Prabowo Subianto and Gibran Rakabuming Raka administration under close observation, particularly regarding its core focus on boosting investment and accelerating job creation amidst persistent global economic uncertainties. As geopolitical tensions, shifting supply chains, and fluctuating commodity prices continue to challenge emerging markets, Indonesia’s strategic pivot toward capital accumulation and workforce expansion has emerged as a central theme in national economic discourse.

During a recent televised policy dialogue in Jakarta, prominent economist and University of Indonesia professor Telisa Falianty offered a comprehensive assessment of the nation’s current economic standing. According to Prof. Telisa, Indonesia’s foundational macroeconomic indicators remain remarkably resilient despite external headwinds. National economic growth has consistently hovered above the 5 percent threshold, inflation remains well-controlled within the target band of around 3 percent, and the open unemployment rate has experienced a notable downward trajectory, settling at 4.65 percent.

The administration’s policy blueprint places substantial emphasis on attracting foreign and domestic capital while shielding vulnerable populations from inflationary pressures. Observers note that maintaining stability in utility pricing and controlling state fiscal buffers are deliberate strategies designed to sustain prioritized development programs without exacerbating the cost-of-living crisis for everyday citizens.

Macroeconomic Resilience and Policy Framework

The resilience of Indonesia’s macroeconomic fundamentals has provided the current administration with the fiscal and monetary space necessary to pursue ambitious structural reforms. In an interconnected global economy vulnerable to protectionist policies and monetary tightening by major central banks, Indonesia has maintained a relatively stable growth trajectory.

The government’s strategic emphasis on downstreaming natural resources, expanding industrial zones, and streamlining regulatory frameworks via the Job Creation Law has served as the backbone for investment attraction. By encouraging value-addition within domestic borders rather than exporting raw materials, the administration aims to capture a larger share of the global supply chain value, ultimately generating higher-paying employment opportunities for a burgeoning domestic workforce.

Fiscal prudence remains a cornerstone of this economic architecture. By intentionally maintaining stability in state-regulated tariffs—such as electricity rates and subsidized fuel prices—alongside careful management of social assistance disbursements like BPJS health insurance contributions, the government has sought to preserve domestic purchasing power. This delicate balancing act aims to stimulate aggregate demand while simultaneously channeling state revenues into capital expenditure and human capital development.

Microeconomic Improvements and Social Welfare Indicators

While macroeconomic aggregates present a positive picture, the intersection between top-tier growth and microeconomic realities remains a critical focal point for policymakers and independent analysts alike. Over the past five years, national data has indicated gradual improvements in poverty reduction metrics and income inequality coefficients.

However, economists caution that structural challenges persist, particularly concerning the socio-economic vulnerabilities of the urban and rural middle class. Recent reflections on national milestones, including discussions surrounding the burdens shouldered by the emerging middle class, underscore the necessity of targeted interventions that extend beyond basic poverty alleviation. Families straddling the poverty line and the lower-middle-class demographic often find themselves exposed to price shocks and limited upward mobility, making inclusive economic growth an urgent imperative.

To address these micro-level disparities, the administration has rolled out various labor market interventions designed to bridge the skills gap and integrate marginalized demographics into the formal economy. Vocational training programs, subsidized apprenticeship initiatives, and localized job fairs have been deployed across numerous provinces in coordination with regional governments.

The Vital Role of Youth Employment and Apprenticeship Programs

A focal point of the recent economic discussions centered on the acute demand for structured employment opportunities among Indonesia’s younger demographic. With a substantial portion of the population comprising Millennials and Generation Z, harnessing the demographic dividend is essential for long-term national prosperity.

Prof. Telisa highlighted the overwhelming public interest in recent government-backed apprenticeship programs, characterizing the high participation rates as a clear indicator of systemic demand among youth seeking viable entry points into the professional sphere. "Program lapangan kerja, kemarin ada program magang yang banyak peminatnya. Artinya generasi muda banyak yang membutuhkan," she stated during the broadcast, emphasizing that young Indonesians are actively seeking avenues to gain practical work experience and enhance their employability.

Despite the high demand, experts stress that the success of such initiatives relies heavily on effective implementation, robust institutional oversight, and comprehensive dissemination of information. Ensuring that vocational and apprenticeship programs reach remote regions outside major urban centers requires active collaboration between central ministries, local government bodies, and mass media channels to maximize transparency and accessibility.

Chronology of Policy Implementation and Recent Developments

The evolution of Indonesia’s current economic policy orientation can be traced through a series of strategic milestones leading up to the current administration’s tenure:

  1. Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery (2021–2023): Following the global disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic, Indonesian economic policies focused heavily on fiscal consolidation, stabilizing national healthcare systems, and reviving micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs).
  2. Transition of Administration and Continuity (Late 2024): The inauguration of President Prabowo Subianto and Vice President Gibran Rakabuming Raka marked a formal commitment to maintaining previous structural reforms while introducing intensified programs centered on food security, energy independence, and targeted social safety nets.
  3. Mid-2025 Fiscal Review: Mid-term evaluations by independent economic think tanks highlighted the administration’s success in keeping inflation under control despite global supply chain fluctuations, though warnings were issued regarding fiscal space constraints.
  4. Late 2026 Policy Dialogues (Current Period): Prominent economists, including representatives from academia and private financial sectors, convened in Jakarta to evaluate the tangible impacts of investment-driven policies, noting improvements in the open unemployment rate while calling for tighter coordination on grassroots job placement programs.

Broader Implications and Future Outlook

Looking ahead, the long-term viability of the Prabowo-Gibran economic agenda will depend on its ability to navigate complex domestic and international variables. On the global front, potential shifts in international trade policies, geopolitical realignments, and commodity market volatility pose ongoing risks to export-oriented sectors. Domestically, maintaining investor confidence requires legal certainty, regulatory consistency, and continuous improvements in bureaucratic efficiency and anti-corruption measures.

Furthermore, economists emphasize that job creation must not only be measured in quantitative terms but also in qualitative enhancement. Transitioning workers from the massive informal sector into formal, protected employment arrangements remains a monumental task that requires sustained investment in education, digital literacy, and technological infrastructure.

As Indonesia continues its pursuit of becoming a high-income nation, the alignment between macroeconomic stability and microeconomic welfare will remain the ultimate test for policymakers. Through balanced fiscal management, targeted labor market integration, and strategic international partnerships, the administration aims to solidify an economic foundation capable of weathering external shocks while delivering tangible prosperity to all segments of society.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Automotive

President Prabowo Subianto Signals Paradigm Shift in Combating Forest Fires by Considering Ecological Terrorism Classification for Perpetrators

by Lina Irawan
written by Lina Irawan

The Indonesian government has embarked on a rigorous policy shift aimed at eradicating the persistent threat of forest and land fires (karhutla), with President Prabowo Subianto signaling an intent to reclassify these environmental offenses as acts of "ecological terrorism." This proposal, which aims to impose significantly harsher legal penalties, has gained momentum following an increasing frequency of climate-driven disasters that have crippled local economies and compromised public health. The initiative, supported by legal and environmental experts, seeks to dismantle the culture of impunity that has historically surrounded large-scale land clearing practices.

The Legislative Proposal: Defining Ecological Terrorism

During a hybrid limited cabinet meeting held at the Merdeka Palace on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, President Prabowo addressed the persistent cycle of annual haze and uncontrolled fires. He tasked the State Secretary and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights with drafting a legislative framework that could elevate the status of environmental arson to the level of national security threats.

The core of the proposal is the categorization of massive, intentional forest destruction as "ecological terrorism." This classification would theoretically allow the state to deploy more robust investigative powers, similar to those used against organized crime and extremist cells. By framing forest destruction as an act of terror, the government intends to shift the narrative from simple administrative negligence to a criminal offense against the state and its citizens.

Marningot Tua Natalis Situmorang, Head of the Environmental Management Master’s Program at Sahid University’s Postgraduate School, has publicly endorsed the President’s stance. In a statement issued on Monday, September 21, 2026, Situmorang emphasized that the sheer scale of human suffering caused by these fires justifies the most severe legal categorization possible. He noted that the cumulative impact—ranging from acute respiratory infections (ISPA) to the long-term economic paralysis of entire regions—constitutes a direct assault on the fundamental rights of the Indonesian population.

Historical Context and the Cycle of Destruction

For decades, Indonesia has battled the recurring crisis of forest fires, primarily concentrated in the peatland areas of Sumatra and Kalimantan. The phenomenon is frequently linked to the expansion of palm oil and pulpwood plantations, where fire is used as a low-cost method for land clearing.

The history of these fires is marked by a cycle of seasonal devastation. The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycles often exacerbate the drought conditions, creating a tinderbox environment. Major events in 1997, 2015, and 2019 serve as dark milestones in Indonesia’s environmental history. During the 2015 fires alone, the World Bank estimated that Indonesia suffered losses totaling approximately USD 16 billion, equivalent to 1.9 percent of the country’s GDP. The crisis resulted in the emission of nearly 1.5 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, placing Indonesia at the center of global climate discussions.

Despite various moratoriums on primary forest clearing and the introduction of the Peatland Restoration Agency (BRG), illegal burning continues to plague the archipelago. The persistence of these fires highlights a systemic challenge: the difficulty of proving the intent of corporate actors in remote, inaccessible areas and the limitations of current administrative sanctions, which many argue are insufficient to act as a meaningful deterrent.

Data-Driven Analysis of Environmental Impact

The urgency behind President Prabowo’s proposal is underscored by longitudinal health and economic data. According to public health reports, millions of Indonesians are exposed to hazardous particulate matter (PM2.5) during peak fire seasons. These particles penetrate deep into the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, leading to a spike in hospital admissions for asthma, bronchitis, and pneumonia.

Economically, the implications extend far beyond the immediate damage to land. The haze often triggers the closure of schools and offices, forces the grounding of flights due to poor visibility, and disrupts supply chains. The total economic cost is multifaceted, incorporating healthcare expenditures, lost labor productivity, and long-term damage to biodiversity and soil carbon sequestration capacity.

Environmental experts point out that the "terrorist" designation would also address the issue of corporate accountability. Currently, many companies found guilty of environmental violations face fines or temporary permit suspensions that are often perceived as "the cost of doing business." The President’s directive to revoke permits for repeat offenders represents a shift toward a "zero-tolerance" policy, aimed at permanently stripping non-compliant entities of their license to operate in the Indonesian landscape.

Official Responses and Regulatory Challenges

The proposal to classify environmental arson as ecological terrorism is not without its complexities. Legal analysts caution that such a reclassification requires a comprehensive overhaul of the existing Law on Environmental Protection and Management (UU PPLH). A shift of this magnitude would necessitate a revision of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and likely require extensive consultation with the House of Representatives (DPR).

Law enforcement agencies, including the National Police and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK), have been instructed to deepen their investigations into corporate ownership structures. The goal is to pierce the corporate veil and hold beneficial owners—not just local subcontractors or individual farmers—legally accountable for large-scale land clearing.

"The law must be an instrument of justice, not just a set of suggestions," an anonymous official from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights remarked following the cabinet meeting. "If the crime involves mass poisoning through smoke and the destruction of the national ecosystem, the legal response must match the severity of the harm caused."

Broader Implications for Global Climate Commitments

Indonesia’s move to tighten its legal grip on forest fire perpetrators also resonates with its international climate commitments, specifically the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. As a nation home to vast tropical rainforests and critical carbon-sequestering peatlands, Indonesia’s ability to manage its land use is a pivotal component of the global effort to limit global temperature rises to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

International observers are monitoring these developments closely. The move is seen as a potential template for other nations in the Global South facing similar challenges with industrial deforestation. By adopting a more aggressive legal stance, Indonesia is attempting to signal to international markets and investors that environmental sustainability is no longer a peripheral concern but a core pillar of national policy.

However, the effectiveness of these measures will hinge on the quality of evidence collection and the integrity of the judicial process. Critics have previously pointed to the difficulties in establishing causality between a specific fire and a specific corporate actor. The use of advanced satellite imagery, remote sensing technology, and forensic environmental auditing will be essential to support the proposed "ecological terrorism" charges in a court of law.

Looking Ahead: A Future of Enforcement

As the government moves forward with drafting these new regulations, the business community is bracing for stricter oversight. Industry associations have expressed concerns about the potential for overly broad interpretations of the law, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines that distinguish between accidental agricultural fires and intentional, large-scale arson.

President Prabowo’s administration remains steadfast in its mandate. The message delivered to the cabinet is clear: the era of lenient penalties for environmental destruction is drawing to a close. By aligning environmental protection with national security, the government aims to create a deterrent that is as formidable as the damage caused by the fires themselves.

The coming months will be critical as the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, in coordination with the DPR, begins the arduous process of legislative drafting. For the millions of citizens who live under the shadow of the annual haze, this policy shift represents a long-awaited recognition of the environmental reality. If successfully implemented, the classification of ecological terrorism could mark a transformative moment in Indonesia’s journey toward sustainable development and environmental stewardship, setting a precedent that the preservation of the nation’s natural capital is a non-negotiable priority of the state.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business and Finance

Zulkifli Hasan Affirms PAN’s Enduring Loyalty to Prabowo Subianto During 28th Anniversary Celebration

by Layla Zulfa
written by Layla Zulfa

The 28th anniversary of the National Mandate Party (PAN), held at the Jakarta International Convention Center (JICC) in Senayan, Jakarta, on Friday evening, September 18, 2026, served as a definitive platform for party leadership to reaffirm its political trajectory. Amidst a backdrop of shifting alliances in the Indonesian political landscape, Chairman Zulkifli Hasan, commonly known as Zulhas, delivered a robust address emphasizing that the party’s alignment with President Prabowo Subianto is not a product of recent political expediency, but rather the result of a decades-long historical bond.

This declaration of loyalty comes at a time when the Indonesian political ecosystem is recalibrating following the 2024 general elections. By framing the relationship between PAN and the President through the lens of historical perseverance rather than mere transactional politics, Zulhas sought to solidify the party’s identity as a steadfast partner in the governing coalition.

A Historical Context of Political Alliance

To understand the weight of Zulhas’s statements, it is necessary to examine the historical trajectory of the relationship between PAN and Prabowo Subianto. Their political partnership traces back long before the successful 2024 presidential campaign. For many years, the two entities found themselves on the same side of the ideological aisle, often operating in opposition to the ruling government.

During the 2014 and 2019 presidential elections, PAN stood firmly behind Prabowo Subianto’s candidacy. Despite the losses incurred in those cycles, the party maintained its support, navigating through periods of political marginalization and internal party pressure to shift allegiances. It was not until the 2024 electoral cycle that this long-term commitment culminated in a decisive victory.

Zulhas noted during his speech that the relationship between the party and the President has been tested by the volatile nature of Indonesian politics. He emphasized that the decision to remain in the fold—even after two consecutive presidential defeats—was rooted in a shared vision for the nation’s development rather than short-term political gains or immediate access to executive power.

Beyond Political Calculation

One of the central themes of the 28th-anniversary celebration was the rejection of the notion that political alliances are solely determined by rational choice theory or "kalkulasi politik" (political calculation). In the modern era, where parties frequently switch sides to ensure survival or maximize ministerial representation, PAN’s narrative of loyalty stands as an outlier.

Zulhas explicitly addressed critics who questioned why the party consistently chose to back a candidate who had faced significant electoral hurdles. He argued that the alliance transcends the goal of forming a government. By characterizing the partnership as a "struggle" that has spanned decades, the leadership aims to appeal to the party’s grassroots supporters, reinforcing the idea that PAN is a party of principle.

From an analytical perspective, this rhetoric serves two purposes. First, it legitimizes the party’s current position within the Prabowo administration by framing it as a well-earned reward for past loyalty. Second, it creates a psychological barrier for any future attempts by rivals to entice the party away from its current alignment, as doing so would require dismantling a narrative of "unwavering loyalty" that the party has spent years building.

The Significance of the 28th Anniversary

The anniversary event at JICC was not merely a ceremonial gathering; it functioned as a strategic rally. With the 2029 general elections on the horizon, PAN is signaling its intent to maintain relevance and potentially increase its parliamentary footprint.

The presence of President Prabowo Subianto at the event, where he referred to the attendees as "kawan seperjuangan yang setia" (loyal comrades-in-arms), provided a significant boost to the party’s prestige. This mutual exchange of affirmation suggests a high level of institutional trust between the executive branch and the party leadership.

The celebration also highlighted the transition of PAN from a party that has traditionally played a secondary role in coalitions to one that seeks to be a foundational pillar of the current administration. As the party looks toward the next legislative cycle, the leadership has set ambitious targets, including an objective to rank among the top four political parties in Indonesia by 2029.

Supporting Data and Legislative Impact

PAN’s performance in the 2024 elections provided the necessary momentum for this bold outlook. Having secured a consistent presence in the House of Representatives (DPR), the party has leveraged its position to influence national policy.

According to political observers, the current stability of the government coalition is heavily dependent on the cohesion of parties like PAN. Since 2024, the party has consistently supported the President’s key legislative agendas, including infrastructure development, economic reforms, and social welfare programs. This alignment has resulted in a period of legislative productivity that is rarely seen in fragmented coalition systems.

The data suggests that this loyalty has been rewarded. PAN currently holds key ministerial positions and influential roles within the cabinet, allowing the party to implement its platform at the national level. However, this proximity to power also brings the challenge of maintaining an independent identity while being inextricably linked to the administration’s policy outcomes.

Implications for the 2029 Political Landscape

As Indonesia looks toward the next electoral cycle, the discourse surrounding loyalty and historical alliance is likely to intensify. The "Prabowo-PAN" narrative will be tested as economic challenges and social dynamics shift.

Analysts suggest that the political landscape in 2029 will be shaped by how well these established alliances deliver on their promises to the electorate. If the current administration succeeds in its economic objectives, the alliance will be viewed as a successful, long-term strategic partnership. Conversely, if economic stagnation or social unrest occurs, the narrative of "loyal comrades" may be weaponized by political opponents to characterize the party as an enabler of failed policies.

For PAN, the strategy is clear: solidify the base, maintain the connection to the President, and leverage the 28th-anniversary momentum to build a platform for national expansion. By emphasizing the "long and winding" history of their cooperation, Zulhas is effectively insulating the party from short-term criticism and creating a legacy-based justification for their continued political trajectory.

Conclusion

The 28th anniversary of PAN has served to clarify the party’s position in the national hierarchy. Through the rhetoric of its chairman, the party has positioned itself as the most reliable partner in the current governing coalition. While critics may point to the complexities of Indonesian political shifts, the party’s narrative remains focused on the long-term struggle and the perceived success of their shared vision.

As the political year unfolds, the focus will remain on whether this commitment to loyalty—a commodity that is often undervalued in modern, pragmatic politics—will yield the electoral growth that the party leadership is aiming for in 2029. For now, the bond between the National Mandate Party and President Prabowo Subianto remains the cornerstone of their political strategy, providing a sense of stability in an otherwise fluid and unpredictable political environment. The event at JICC was not just a celebration of the past; it was a clear declaration of intent for the future, centered on the belief that historical perseverance is the most potent tool in the pursuit of political longevity.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Automotive

Zulhas Tegaskan PAN Akan Terus Bersama Prabowo Subianto dalam Puncak Peringatan HUT ke-28 Partai Amanat Nasional

by Asro
written by Asro

The political landscape in Indonesia remains firmly aligned with the current administration as the National Mandate Party (PAN) reaffirmed its unwavering support for President Prabowo Subianto. During the high-profile culmination of the party’s 28th anniversary celebrations, held at the Jakarta International Convention Center (JICC) in Senayan on Friday, September 18, 2026, General Chairman Zulkifli Hasan—familiarly known as Zulhas—delivered a definitive stance on the party’s strategic direction. Addressing a sea of party cadres, Zulhas emphasized that PAN’s commitment to the Prabowo-led government is not merely a political coalition arrangement but a reflection of shared ideological goals for the nation’s future.

A Renewed Commitment to National Ideals

The atmosphere at the JICC was charged with enthusiasm as thousands of PAN members gathered to mark the party’s nearly three decades of existence. In his keynote address, Zulhas explicitly posed a rhetorical question to the audience, asking whether the party should maintain its alliance with the President. The immediate, thunderous response of "Setuju!" (Agreed!) from the floor underscored the internal unity within the party regarding its support for the executive branch.

Zulhas elaborated on the philosophical underpinnings of this partnership, noting that the alliance is rooted in a collective vision for the Republic of Indonesia. He specifically highlighted Article 33 and Article 34 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as the foundational pillars that drive this cooperation. These articles mandate that the economy be structured as a collective effort based on the principle of kinship, and that the state is responsible for the welfare of the impoverished and orphaned children. By framing the support for President Prabowo within the context of constitutional mandates, Zulhas sought to elevate the political coalition from a tactical alliance to a mission-driven partnership aimed at long-term national development.

Historical Context: Three Decades of Political Evolution

To understand the significance of this declaration, one must examine the historical trajectory of PAN. Founded in the reform era of 1998, PAN has navigated various political climates, from being a part of the opposition to serving as a cornerstone of the ruling coalition. Its relationship with Prabowo Subianto, the current President, is characterized by a long-standing history that transcends the 2024 general election.

PAN has been one of the most consistent supporters of Prabowo Subianto throughout his political journey. This loyalty was evident across three consecutive presidential election cycles. Even when other political factions shifted their allegiances or remained hesitant, PAN maintained a consistent, albeit sometimes evolving, relationship with the Gerindra Party leader. This long-term alignment has solidified a level of mutual trust between the party leadership and the presidential office, making the current declaration a culmination of years of political investment.

Chronology of the 2026 Anniversary Event

The celebration of the 28th anniversary was meticulously planned to serve as both a commemorative event and a political signal.

  • 19:00 WIB: Opening ceremonies featuring cultural performances highlighting the diversity of Indonesia.
  • 20:30 WIB: The arrival of senior party officials and key figures from the Coalition for Indonesia Maju (KIM).
  • 21:15 WIB: The keynote address by Zulkifli Hasan. The speech focused on the achievements of the current administration and the necessity of maintaining stability for the remainder of the presidential term.
  • 22:00 WIB: A solemn prayer session, where the party collectively requested divine guidance and protection for the President, signaling the ideological and moral dimension of their support.

The inclusion of a collective prayer at the end of the event was a strategic move to soften the hard-edged political rhetoric, framing the support for the President as a national duty rather than a mere transactional political move.

Zulhas Tegaskan PAN Akan Terus Bersama Prabowo Subianto

Implications for the National Political Landscape

The firm commitment expressed by Zulhas carries significant implications for the broader political landscape in Indonesia. In a system characterized by shifting alliances and fluid party loyalties, a stable, long-term commitment from a major party like PAN provides the President with a solid legislative base.

  1. Legislative Stability: With PAN’s continued support, the government can expect a smoother passage of major policies and fiscal budgets in the House of Representatives (DPR). This stability is crucial as the government navigates economic challenges, global supply chain pressures, and the implementation of long-term infrastructure projects.
  2. Coalition Cohesion: The announcement serves as a benchmark for other parties within the governing coalition. It signals that the core members of the coalition are not looking for an early exit or a shift in political orientation, effectively curbing rumors of internal fragmentation.
  3. Policy Continuity: By aligning with the administration’s focus on the constitutional mandates of social and economic welfare, PAN is effectively signaling its support for the current government’s "downstreaming" policies and social safety net expansions, which are central to the current administration’s platform.

Analytical Perspectives: Why Loyalty Matters

Political analysts observing the event note that for a party like PAN, maintaining a close relationship with the President is a strategic necessity to ensure its relevance in the national executive branch. However, the intensity of the language used by Zulhas suggests more than just administrative convenience. It indicates an ideological convergence.

Historically, PAN has positioned itself as a party that balances religious values with modern democratic principles. President Prabowo’s approach, which emphasizes strong national defense, sovereignty, and state-led economic development, aligns well with the nationalist-religious synthesis often championed by PAN. The mention of Article 33—often cited in discussions about state-controlled resources and the protection of the national economy—is a clear nod to the populist-nationalist economic policies that both the party and the President support.

Responses and Future Outlook

While the event was primarily an internal party affair, the impact has resonated across the political spectrum. Observers from various think tanks have noted that this reaffirmation of support is a calculated move to ensure that the party remains a central stakeholder in the government’s policymaking process.

Opposition figures have yet to issue formal responses to the speech, but the alignment between the executive and the legislature suggests that the administration will face minimal resistance on core policy issues in the coming months. For the grassroots members of PAN, the message is clear: the party is not drifting away from its partner. This sense of certainty is expected to bolster morale among the party’s regional branches as they prepare for upcoming local and regional political cycles.

As Indonesia looks toward the latter half of the 2020s, the political alliance between PAN and President Prabowo appears increasingly cemented. The rhetoric at the 28th anniversary was not just about the past; it was a proactive statement regarding the future. By tying the party’s destiny to the success of the President, Zulhas has set a high bar for internal discipline and external cooperation. Whether this strategy will lead to long-term electoral dividends for PAN remains to be seen, but in the immediate term, it has successfully established a clear, unified, and decisive political narrative for the party.

The event concluded with a strong message of unity, signaling that as long as the administration adheres to the principles of the 1945 Constitution and works toward the welfare of the Indonesian people, PAN will remain a steadfast ally. As the nation faces global economic uncertainties and domestic social challenges, this political stability is likely to be a defining feature of the current administrative period.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health and Wellness

President Prabowo Subianto Admits Dislike for Reading Prepared Speeches During PAN 28th Anniversary Celebration

by Basiran
written by Basiran

President Prabowo Subianto has candidly expressed his personal aversion to relying on pre-drafted scripts during public addresses, noting that professional advisors frequently urge him to adhere strictly to prepared texts. The remarks were made during his keynote address at the grand celebration marking the 28th anniversary of the National Mandate Party (PAN), held at the Jakarta International Convention Center (JICC) in Senayan, Jakarta.

Addressing a packed auditorium of party loyalists, lawmakers, and political figures, the Indonesian head of state shared a lighthearted yet revealing glimpse into the tension between his natural speaking style and the counsel of his communications team. The revelation underscores a distinctive characteristic of Prabowo’s political persona: a preference for spontaneous, conversational rhetoric over tightly managed institutional messaging.

The setting for this disclosure was an event of high political significance. The anniversary celebration served not only as a milestone for one of Indonesia’s prominent political parties within the ruling coalition but also as a platform for alignment among key stakeholders of the national government. Yet, rather than delivering a heavily vetted, policy-dense speech typical of state functions, Prabowo chose to pivot toward a more personal and unrehearsed dialogue with the audience.

The Tension Between Spontaneity and Protocol

During his speech, Prabowo acknowledged that his tendency to deviate from prepared talking points often creates anxiety among his aides, political consultants, and communication strategists. He revealed that experts consistently advise him to stick to the script to mitigate political risks and maintain message discipline.

"Saudara sekalian, berkali-kali di manapun saya sampaikan beberapa hal, mungkin yang sudah dengar pidato-pidato saya mungkin bosan. Tapi tidak apalah. Toh saudara sudah undang saya ke sini. Benar? Salah panitia undang saya," Prabowo remarked, reflecting on his recurring themes and playfully shifting accountability to the event organizers for inviting an unpredictable speaker.

Translating to his broader communicative philosophy, the President elaborated on the core friction point with his advisors. "I am always told by advisors, political experts, and communication experts, ‘Mr. Prabowo, do not speak without a text. You must use a text.’ But what can I do? I prefer to speak naturally and as I am."

This stylistic preference has long defined Prabowo’s public engagements. Throughout his decades-long career in public service—spanning his military tenure, opposition leadership, and eventual ascension to the presidency—observers have noted his transition from formal military briefings to passionate, populist oratorical displays. While text-dependent speeches are standard protocol for heads of state to ensure precise diplomatic phrasing and policy accuracy, Prabowo’s inclination toward off-the-cuff remarks has frequently energized crowds while occasionally keeping his communications team on edge.

Background Context of the Event and PAN Anniversary

The 28th-anniversary celebration of the National Mandate Party (PAN) was a major fixture on the Indonesian political calendar. Founded in the wake of the 1998 Reformasi movement by prominent figure Amien Rais and a coalition of intellectuals and activists, PAN has evolved into a stable anchor within successive government coalitions.

The presence of President Prabowo at the milestone event highlighted the solid strategic partnership between the executive branch and PAN leadership, notably party chairman Zulkifli Hasan. For PAN, hosting the sitting president at their anniversary underscores their integral role in the current administration and provides a platform to reinforce party solidarity ahead of future legislative cycles.

In the lead-up to the event, party organizers had anticipated a high-profile address outlining national achievements and future policy directions. Prabowo did touch upon key themes of national unity, economic resilience, and governance; however, his detour into the mechanics of his speechwriting process captured the most attention, humanizing the presidency and resonating with an audience accustomed to highly sanitized political discourse.

The Role of Speechwriting in Modern Indonesian Politics

In contemporary governance, presidential speeches are rarely left to chance. They are the culmination of hours of inter-agency coordination, policy review, and strategic framing. Ministries ranging from the State Secretariat to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs contribute data points, legal caveats, and programmatic updates to ensure that every public utterance by the head of state aligns with official state policy.

For a leader like Prabowo Subianto, balancing the rigorous demands of institutional communication with a personal desire for authenticity presents a continuous operational challenge. Communications scholars and political analysts note that while scripted speeches minimize the risk of diplomatic missteps or market-moving policy blunders, unscripted dialogues often foster a deeper emotional connection with the electorate.

When a president speaks off the cuff, audiences frequently perceive the message as more genuine and less filtered by political public relations. However, this approach carries inherent vulnerabilities. Unscripted remarks can occasionally be misinterpreted by financial markets, foreign governments, or domestic political opposition, forcing cabinet ministers and presidential spokespersons into retroactive clarification roles.

Fact-Based Analysis of Implications

Prabowo’s public admission at the PAN anniversary carries several distinct implications for his administration’s communication strategy and political positioning:

  1. Reinforcement of Populist Appeal: By openly admitting his dislike for teleprompters and prepared texts, Prabowo reinforces his image as a straightforward, unpretentious leader who values direct engagement over bureaucratic formality. This style resonates strongly with grassroots supporters who favor perceived authenticity over polished political theater.
  2. Challenges for Communications Staff: The President’s preference creates a high-stress environment for his media and policy advisors. Ensuring that national policy positions remain consistent while accommodating an unscripted executive style requires agile crisis communication and rapid response protocols from the Presidential Communications Office.
  3. Media Dynamics: Indonesian media outlets frequently capitalize on unscripted presidential remarks, extracting memorable soundbites that dominate news cycles. While this maintains high visibility for the administration, it shifts journalistic focus away from dense policy debates toward the stylistic nuances of the President’s delivery.
  4. Coalition Relations: Delivering such candid remarks in front of a key coalition partner like PAN signals a high degree of comfort and political security. It demonstrates that the President feels secure enough among political allies to drop formal diplomatic guard rails and share internal operational frustrations lightheartedly.

Chronology of Related Events

To understand the trajectory of Prabowo’s public speaking style, it is helpful to examine key milestones in his communications approach since taking office:

  • October 2024: Following his inauguration, Prabowo’s early cabinet addresses emphasize discipline, nationalism, and anti-corruption measures, blending formal policy reading with impassioned impromptu exhortations to his ministers.
  • Late 2024 to 2025: Throughout various regional visits and economic summits, observers note a recurring pattern where the President sets aside prepared remarks to directly address local grievances or share personal anecdotes with citizens.
  • September 2026: During the 28th anniversary of PAN at JICC Senayan, Prabowo explicitly articulates his frustration with advisors who mandate speech texts, marking one of his most direct public acknowledgments of the internal debate surrounding his oratorical style.

Official Responses and Broader Reactions

While immediate opposition figures have occasionally scrutinized the ambiguity of unscripted executive statements, allies within the ruling coalition view Prabowo’s conversational approach as a sign of strong leadership confidence. Representatives from PAN lauded the President’s visit and his engaging address, emphasizing that the party remains fully aligned with his broader vision for national development.

Communication experts suggest that the administration may adopt a hybrid model moving forward: utilizing strict scripts for high-stakes international summits and formal state legislation, while permitting a more relaxed, conversational format during domestic party gatherings and grassroots engagements. This approach allows the President to maintain necessary diplomatic precision while preserving the personal touch that connects him with his voter base.

As the Prabowo administration continues to navigate domestic economic priorities and international partnerships, the tension between prepared policy texts and spontaneous rhetoric will likely remain a defining characteristic of his presidency—a testament to a leader who continuously seeks to bridge the gap between institutional protocol and personal authenticity.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Entertainment and Celebrity

President Prabowo Subianto Warns That Democracy Can Be Hijacked and Purchased by Economic Elites

by Lina Hope
written by Lina Hope

JAKARTA — Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto issued a stern warning regarding the vulnerability of the nation’s political system, cautioning that democracy can be hijacked and systematically bought by powerful economic actors wielding illicit wealth. The statement was delivered during the commemoration of the 28th anniversary of the National Mandate Party (PAN) held at the Jakarta International Convention Center (JICC) in Senayan, Jakarta.

Addressing thousands of party cadres, lawmakers, and invited dignitaries, the head of state emphasized that while Indonesia has made remarkable strides in establishing a democratic society since the onset of the Reformasi era in 1998, systemic threats persist. He highlighted how vast financial resources, particularly capital acquired through questionable or illegal means, pose a direct peril to the integrity of democratic governance, state institutions, and the rule of law.

The speech immediately drew significant public attention, sparking widespread discussions among political analysts, civil society organizations, and ordinary citizens regarding the intersection of money politics, governance reform, and the future of Indonesian democracy.

The Context of the PAN Anniversary Celebration

The 28th anniversary of the National Mandate Party served as a major political gathering, bringing together coalition partners, high-ranking government officials, and key figures from across the national political spectrum. PAN, which has been a steadfast political ally of Prabowo’s administration, provided a platform for the President to address broader national concerns.

In his opening remarks, Prabowo reflected on the long journey of political partnership and mutual loyalty among coalition members, describing the gathering as a reunion of reliable comrades-in-arms. However, the tone quickly shifted from celebratory to cautionary as the President pivoted toward the perils facing contemporary governance.

"Brothers and sisters, we must be careful because democracy can be hijacked. Democracy can be bought by those with immense economic power, those with abundant money, and especially those whose money is obtained through unlawful means," Prabowo stated during his keynote address.

The President elaborated on the mechanics of this perceived threat, warning that corrupt economic elites harbor ambitions to subvert state institutions for private gain. He outlined an alarming scenario in which money is deployed to corrupt the foundational pillars of the republic.

"They want to hijack our democracy. They want to bribe our political figures. They want to buy them—bribe judges, bribe prosecutors, bribe generals, bribe ministers, they even want to bribe the President!" he added emphatically.

The Modern Threat Landscape: Algorithms, Social Media, and Digital Manipulation

Beyond traditional forms of political corruption such as vote-buying and illicit campaign financing, President Prabowo drew attention to contemporary challenges posed by the digital age. He warned that the battleground for democracy has expanded into cyberspace, where advanced technologies are frequently weaponized to deceive the electorate.

Prabowo specifically highlighted the deployment of algorithms, paid social media influencers, automated bot networks, and organized buzzer teams. According to the President, these digital tools are utilized to spread misinformation, polarize public opinion, and manipulate social discourse, ultimately undermining the psychological resilience of the public.

This aspect of the speech resonates with growing global concerns regarding information warfare and the erosion of digital trust. In recent years, political observers have noted an increasing reliance on algorithmic manipulation during election cycles in various democracies worldwide, raising questions about how nations can safeguard digital sovereignty without compromising freedom of speech.

Chronology of Money Politics and Institutional Reform in Indonesia

To fully understand the weight of President Prabowo’s warnings, it is necessary to examine the historical trajectory of money politics and anti-corruption efforts in post-Authoritarian Indonesia.

Since the fall of President Suharto in 1998, Indonesia transitioned from a centralized, authoritarian regime to one of the largest decentralized democracies in the world. The transition introduced direct elections for local executive positions, legislative seats, and the presidency. However, decentralization also decentralized corruption, giving rise to local political dynasties and the heavy monetization of political campaigns.

  • Early 2000s: The establishment of foundational democratic institutions, including the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), aimed to curb systemic abuse of power.
  • 2010s: Legislative and presidential campaigns saw a steady escalation in campaign expenditures, prompting the General Elections Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) to tighten regulations on campaign finance transparency.
  • 2020–Present: Despite stringent reporting requirements, watchdog organizations continue to report pervasive vote-buying practices, commonly referred to locally as serangan fajar (dawn attacks), during regional and national elections. Furthermore, high-profile corruption scandals involving senior members of the judiciary, law enforcement, and parliament have periodically shaken public confidence in state institutions.

Broader Implications for Governance and the Rule of Law

Political analysts and governance experts suggest that Prabowo’s remarks reflect an acute awareness of the challenges facing his administration as it attempts to consolidate power while simultaneously pursuing an aggressive anti-corruption agenda.

The warning that even high-ranking officials—ranging from judges and prosecutors to military generals and cabinet ministers—could be targeted by corrupt financial interests underscores the deep-rooted nature of systemic graft. Observers note that systemic corruption not only distorts economic development by favoring monopolistic practices over free-market competition, but it also hollows out the institutional checks and balances necessary for a functioning democracy.

By publicly acknowledging these vulnerabilities, the President places immense pressure on law enforcement agencies, including the KPK, the National Police, and the Attorney General’s Office, to demonstrate tangible results in prosecuting financial crimes and high-level corruption.

Reactions from Political Parties and Civil Society

Responses to the President’s address have poured in from various political factions and civil society organizations.

Representatives from PAN expressed strong support for the President’s stance, emphasizing that the party remains committed to clean governance and strengthening democratic institutions from within. Party insiders noted that safeguarding democracy from the corrosive influence of illicit capital is a shared responsibility that transcends partisan lines.

Meanwhile, civil society groups focused on anti-corruption and electoral integrity, such as Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) and the Association for Elections and Democracy (Perludem), welcomed the rhetorical commitment to fighting elite capture of the state. However, these organizations stressed that rhetoric must be matched by concrete policy reforms.

Key recommendations often put forward by civil society include:

  1. Stricter Campaign Finance Audits: Enhancing the transparency of political party funding and enforcing real-time tracking of campaign donations.
  2. Asset Recovery Legislation: Accelerating the passage and implementation of asset forfeiture laws to target the ill-gotten gains of corrupt individuals.
  3. Judicial Independence: Strengthening ethical oversight within the judiciary and law enforcement agencies to prevent external financial interference in legal proceedings.
  4. Digital Literacy and Regulation: Developing robust frameworks to address algorithmic manipulation and coordinated inauthentic behavior on social media platforms without curtailing legitimate political expression.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

President Prabowo Subianto’s address at the PAN anniversary serves as a stark reminder of the fragile nature of democratic systems when confronted by unbridled economic power and illicit capital. As Indonesia navigates its complex political and economic landscape, the challenge ahead lies in translating these high-level warnings into structural reforms that can effectively immunize state institutions against the corrupting influence of money.

The coming months will likely test the administration’s resolve as it balances coalition politics with the imperative of institutional purification, setting the tone for the remainder of the presidential term and the long-term health of Indonesian democracy.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts