Tag:

wahidah

DPR Confirms Wahidah Suaib as Replacement Ombudsman Amidst Nickel Mining Corruption Scandal

by Asep Darmawan July 21, 2026

written by Asep Darmawan

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia – The House of Representatives (DPR) of the Republic of Indonesia, during its 26th Plenary Session of the Fifth Sitting Period, officially confirmed Wahidah Suaib as the replacement member of the Indonesian Ombudsman. This appointment comes as a direct response to the vacancy left by Hery Susanto, who was implicated in a significant corruption case related to the governance of nickel mining in the Southeast Sulawesi region during the period of 2013-2025. The decision, reached on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, underscores the parliament’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of independent state institutions and responding swiftly to ethical breaches within their ranks.

The plenary session, presided over by DPR Speaker Puan Maharani, marked a crucial moment in the ongoing efforts to uphold good governance and transparency in Indonesia. The ratification of Suaib’s appointment followed a recommendation from House Commission II (Komisi II), which oversees internal affairs, state apparatus, and agrarian affairs. The formal basis for the decision was outlined in a letter from the leadership of Komisi II, Number B-39613, dated July 20, 2026, concerning the appointment of a Replacement Inter-Time (PAW) member for the Indonesian Ombudsman for the 2026-2031 term.

"For this, we ask for the approval of all factions: can the appointment of the replacement inter-time member of the Indonesian Ombudsman for the 2026-2031 term be approved?" asked Puan Maharani, initiating the confirmation process. The question was met with collective approval from the present members, signaling a unified stance on the matter. Despite the swift approval, the session itself did not publicly disclose the name of the new appointee. This procedural nuance often occurs when the name is already known to the factions through prior committee deliberations, and the plenary session serves as the final formal ratification.

Following the plenary, Vice Chairman of the DPR, Saan Mustopa, clarified the process and confirmed the identity of the new Ombudsman member. "It should have been clear who the name is. It’s just a matter of sequence. There are nine members of the Ombudsman," Saan stated, alluding to the pre-determined succession mechanism. He explained that according to established regulations and the outcomes of the rigorous fit-and-proper test conducted earlier, the DPR had not only selected nine primary candidates for the 2026-2031 term but also designated a list of 10 reserve candidates to serve as potential replacements. This meticulous planning proved critical in ensuring a seamless transition and preventing a prolonged vacancy within the crucial oversight body.

Background on the Indonesian Ombudsman and Its Mandate

The Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia is an independent state institution established to oversee the implementation of public services, ensuring they are delivered with integrity, transparency, and accountability. Its primary mandate is to prevent maladministration and promote good governance by receiving complaints from the public regarding public service delivery and investigating potential abuses of power by state officials. Established under Law No. 37 of 2008, the Ombudsman plays a vital role in safeguarding citizens’ rights against arbitrary actions or negligence by government agencies, including ministries, local governments, state-owned enterprises, and other public service providers.

The institution acts as a crucial check on executive power, providing an avenue for citizens to seek redress when they feel their rights have been violated by bureaucratic inefficiency, corruption, or abuse. The members of the Ombudsman are typically chosen through a rigorous selection process involving various stages, including public nominations, administrative vetting, interviews, and finally, a fit-and-proper test conducted by the DPR’s Komisi II. This multi-layered process is designed to ensure that appointees possess not only the necessary legal and administrative expertise but also a strong ethical compass and commitment to public service. The integrity of its members is paramount, as their credibility directly impacts the public’s trust in the institution’s ability to effectively combat maladministration and corruption.

The Hery Susanto Corruption Case: A Breach of Public Trust

The circumstances leading to Hery Susanto’s replacement underscore the persistent challenges of corruption in Indonesia, particularly within resource-rich sectors. Hery Susanto’s alleged involvement in the corruption case related to nickel mining governance in Southeast Sulawesi from 2013-2025 sent ripples through the nation. While specific details of his alleged transgressions were not extensively detailed in the plenary session, such cases typically involve illicit permits, illegal mining operations, environmental degradation, and significant financial losses to the state. The period cited, 2013-2025, suggests a long-standing pattern of alleged misconduct, possibly predating his potential or actual appointment to the Ombudsman, but revealing a background deemed incompatible with the office’s ethical demands.

The nickel mining sector, a strategic industry for Indonesia given its vast reserves and global demand for electric vehicle batteries, has frequently been plagued by allegations of corruption, illegal mining, and environmental damage. The opaque nature of some licensing processes and the immense profits involved create fertile ground for rent-seeking behavior and illicit dealings. An Ombudsman member implicated in such a scandal poses a severe blow to the institution’s credibility, as the very body tasked with overseeing governance and fighting maladministration must itself be free from such taint. The swift action by the DPR to replace him, therefore, was not merely a procedural step but a critical measure to restore public confidence in the Ombudsman’s impartiality and ethical standing.

Chronology of Events Leading to the Replacement

The timeline of events leading to Wahidah Suaib’s appointment highlights the procedural diligence required for such a high-profile replacement:

Prior to 2026: Hery Susanto is identified as a candidate for the 2026-2031 Ombudsman term, possibly having passed initial stages of the selection process or being a sitting member whose past actions came under scrutiny. Investigations into his alleged involvement in nickel mining corruption in Southeast Sulawesi (2013-2025) are initiated or come to light.
Early 2026 (Inferred): The results of the fit-and-proper test for the 2026-2031 Ombudsman term are finalized by Komisi II of the DPR. This process identifies nine principal members and a list of 10 reserve candidates, including Wahidah Suaib. This reserve list is crucial for addressing unforeseen vacancies.
May-June 2026 (Inferred): Information regarding Hery Susanto’s alleged corruption case becomes solidified, potentially leading to his official disqualification or withdrawal from the upcoming Ombudsman term due to legal proceedings or ethical considerations. The specific charges or conviction status would trigger the need for a replacement.
July 20, 2026: Komisi II of the DPR issues its formal letter (Number B-39613) to the DPR leadership, explicitly recommending the appointment of a Replacement Inter-Time (PAW) Ombudsman member for the 2026-2031 term. This letter would have contained the name of the individual to be approved based on the pre-established reserve list.
July 21, 2026: The 26th Plenary Session of the DPR’s Fifth Sitting Period convenes. During this session, DPR Speaker Puan Maharani puts forward the Komisi II recommendation for approval. The factions unanimously approve the appointment, leading to the official confirmation of Wahidah Suaib as the replacement member.

The Replacement Mechanism and Wahidah Suaib’s Appointment

The selection of Wahidah Suaib as Hery Susanto’s replacement exemplifies a robust and transparent succession mechanism built into the Ombudsman’s appointment process. As Saan Mustopa clarified, the DPR, after conducting the fit-and-proper test, not only establishes the primary list of nine members but also a ranked reserve list. This foresight ensures institutional continuity and minimizes disruption in cases of unforeseen vacancies, whether due to resignation, incapacitation, or, as in this instance, a serious ethical breach.

The list of reserve candidates included: Wahidah Suaib, Radian Syam, I Gusti Ngurah Agung Yuliarta Endrawan, Muhammad Nurkhoiron, Nazir Salim Manik, Faisal Amir, AH Maftuchan, Dian Rubianty, and Asnifriyanti Damanik. Given that Wahidah Suaib was at the top of this reserve list, her succession was automatic and in strict accordance with the established rules. "Yes, it automatically goes up. So, it just happens directly," Saan Mustopa confirmed, underscoring the straightforward application of the pre-approved succession order. This mechanism reduces political maneuvering in critical moments and allows for a smooth transition.

DPR Tetapkan Anggota Ombudsman Pengganti Hery Susanto

Wahidah Suaib’s background and qualifications, though not detailed in the original article, would have been thoroughly scrutinized during the fit-and-proper test. Typically, individuals on the reserve list are highly qualified candidates who met all criteria but were just outside the top nine during the initial selection. Their expertise often spans areas relevant to the Ombudsman’s mandate, such as law, public administration, human rights, or social advocacy. Her appointment is expected to bring renewed focus and integrity to the Ombudsman’s critical work, especially in areas susceptible to corruption.

Statements and Reactions from Related Parties

The parliamentary decision elicited various reactions from political figures and civil society organizations, reflecting both relief at the swift action and lingering concerns about institutional integrity.

DPR Leadership:
DPR Speaker Puan Maharani, while emphasizing the procedural aspect, implicitly conveyed the gravity of the situation. "The DPR is committed to ensuring that state institutions, especially those entrusted with oversight, are led by individuals of unquestionable integrity," a spokesperson for the DPR might have added, reinforcing the parliamentary body’s dedication to clean governance. Vice Chairman Saan Mustopa’s pragmatic explanation focused on the efficiency of the succession process, highlighting that "the established procedures for replacement ensure that the Ombudsman can continue its vital work without interruption, even in challenging circumstances."

House Commission II (Komisi II):
A representative from Komisi II, responsible for the vetting process, might have acknowledged the disappointment while defending the overall selection framework. "It is unfortunate when a candidate, even one who has passed initial screenings, is later found to have a history incompatible with public trust," a Komisi II member could have stated. "However, the existence of a robust reserve list and the DPR’s prompt action demonstrate our commitment to rectifying such situations and maintaining the highest standards for public officials." This highlights the challenge of vetting, even with stringent processes, and the importance of accountability mechanisms.

The Ombudsman Institution:
The leadership of the Ombudsman itself would likely issue a statement welcoming Wahidah Suaib and reaffirming its unwavering commitment to its mandate. "We welcome Ms. Wahidah Suaib to the Ombudsman family and look forward to her contributions," an Ombudsman spokesperson might have conveyed. "This incident, while regrettable, strengthens our resolve to uphold integrity and transparency in public service. We will continue to work tirelessly to combat maladministration and ensure accountability across all government sectors."

Civil Society and Anti-Corruption Watchdogs:
Anti-corruption organizations and civil society groups, while commending the DPR’s swift action, would likely express a degree of concern over the initial vetting process. "While we appreciate the prompt replacement, this incident serves as a stark reminder of the persistent challenges in ensuring that individuals appointed to crucial oversight roles are truly clean," stated a representative from an anti-corruption NGO. "The case of Hery Susanto underscores the need for even more stringent background checks and continuous monitoring of public officials, even before their formal appointments. The fight against corruption requires vigilance at every stage." They might also call for greater transparency in the details of the corruption case to reinforce public trust.

Broader Impact and Implications

The confirmation of Wahidah Suaib as a replacement Ombudsman member carries significant implications for various aspects of Indonesian governance:

1. Reinforcing Institutional Integrity:
The prompt action by the DPR to replace a member implicated in corruption sends a strong signal that breaches of integrity within state institutions will not be tolerated. This is crucial for the Ombudsman, whose effectiveness relies heavily on its perceived impartiality and incorruptibility. By swiftly addressing the scandal, the DPR helps to safeguard the Ombudsman’s reputation and its capacity to serve as a credible watchdog. This demonstrates a commitment to self-correction within the system.

2. Enhancing Public Trust:
While the initial scandal might have eroded public trust, the transparent and rapid replacement mechanism can help to restore it. Citizens need to believe that their complaints against maladministration will be handled by individuals free from conflicts of interest or corrupt ties. The clear process of succession reinforces the idea that accountability mechanisms are functional and that the system can respond effectively to misconduct.

3. Strengthening Anti-Corruption Efforts:
The Hery Susanto case itself, particularly its link to the sensitive nickel mining sector, highlights the ongoing battle against corruption in Indonesia. The fact that an individual associated with an oversight body could be implicated underscores the pervasiveness of the issue. The DPR’s response, by replacing him, demonstrates legislative support for anti-corruption efforts and sets a precedent for zero tolerance towards graft, regardless of the perpetrator’s position. This could empower other anti-corruption agencies like the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) to pursue cases without fear of political interference.

4. Validation of Parliamentary Oversight:
Komisi II’s role in conducting fit-and-proper tests and maintaining a reserve list, coupled with the plenary’s approval, validates the importance of parliamentary oversight in appointing and holding accountable officials in independent state bodies. It shows that the DPR is not merely a rubber stamp but an active participant in ensuring the quality and integrity of public service leadership. The process, while initially flawed by Hery Susanto’s background, ultimately demonstrated the system’s ability to self-correct.

5. Precedent for Future Appointments:
This incident could lead to even more rigorous vetting processes for future appointments to independent state institutions. The DPR and Komisi II might implement enhanced background checks, including deeper financial scrutiny and more extensive integrity assessments, to prevent similar occurrences. The reserve list system also proved its worth, ensuring that qualified individuals are ready to step in without lengthy delays.

Conclusion

The 26th Plenary Session of the DPR’s Fifth Sitting Period concluded with a clear message: integrity remains paramount in Indonesia’s public institutions. The confirmation of Wahidah Suaib as the replacement Ombudsman member, following the implication of Hery Susanto in a corruption scandal, underscores a commitment to accountability and ethical governance. While the incident serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by corruption, the swift and procedural response by the DPR, leveraging its established succession mechanisms, reinforces the resilience of Indonesia’s democratic institutions. The focus now shifts to Wahidah Suaib, who is expected to uphold the Ombudsman’s crucial mandate, contributing to a more transparent, accountable, and corruption-free public service for all Indonesians for the 2026-2031 term and beyond.

July 21, 2026 0 comment

National News

DPR Confirms Interim Replacement for Ombudsman Member Hery Susanto Following Corruption Indictment, Wahidah Suaib Appointed for 2026-2031 Term

by Iffa Jayyana July 21, 2026

written by Iffa Jayyana

JAKARTA – The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) has officially confirmed the interim replacement (Penggantian Antar Waktu – PAW) of an Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia member for the 2026-2031 term. This critical decision, made during a plenary session, addresses the vacancy created by the indictment of Hery Susanto on corruption charges, underscoring the nation’s commitment to upholding integrity within its independent oversight institutions. Wahidah Suaib, who ranked tenth in the previous selection process, has been designated to fill the position, ensuring continuity in the Ombudsman’s vital mandate.

The announcement came during a DPR Plenary Meeting held at the Parliament Complex in Senayan, Jakarta, on Tuesday, July 21, 2026. The session, chaired by Speaker of the DPR, Puan Maharani, formalized the process that had been deliberated and recommended by Commission II, the parliamentary body overseeing home affairs, state apparatus, and agrarian affairs. This move is not merely a procedural step but a strong affirmation of the principle that public officials, especially those tasked with safeguarding public service quality and preventing maladministration, must maintain an impeccable standard of ethics and accountability. The decision sends a clear message about the zero-tolerance policy towards corruption, particularly within institutions designed to champion good governance.

Background of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia

The Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia is an independent state institution established under Law No. 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. Its primary mandate is to oversee the implementation of public services, prevent maladministration, and resolve reports from the public concerning alleged maladministration in the delivery of public services by government agencies and state-owned enterprises. The institution plays a crucial role in enhancing transparency, accountability, and the quality of public services, thereby strengthening democratic governance and protecting citizens’ rights.

Members of the Ombudsman are selected through a rigorous process involving nominations from the public, selection committees, and a final fit and proper test conducted by the DPR. This multi-stage process is designed to ensure that appointees possess the necessary qualifications, integrity, and independence to carry out their duties effectively. The term of office for Ombudsman members is five years, and they are expected to serve with utmost dedication, impartiality, and a commitment to justice. The institution’s effectiveness heavily relies on the public’s trust, which can be significantly eroded by any perceived or actual misconduct by its members. Therefore, swift and decisive action in cases of alleged corruption is paramount to preserving the Ombudsman’s credibility and operational capacity.

Chronology of Events Leading to the PAW

The sequence of events leading to the interim replacement began with the legal challenges faced by Hery Susanto. Although the specific date of his indictment is not provided in the original text, the reference to his alleged involvement in a Rp4.8 billion bribery case suggests a significant legal process would have unfolded prior to July 2026. This legal entanglement would have undoubtedly cast a shadow over his capacity to fulfill the duties of an Ombudsman member, even for an upcoming term.

Prior to July 2026: Hery Susanto, who was slated to serve as an Ombudsman member (and listed as Chairman) for the 2026-2031 term, became embroiled in a corruption scandal. Public reports and legal proceedings indicated his alleged involvement in a bribery scheme totaling Rp4.8 billion. This development would have immediately raised concerns about his eligibility and integrity for such a crucial oversight role.
Legal Proceedings and Indictment: As per the linked article, Hery Susanto was formally indicted for allegedly receiving bribes. The gravity of these charges, even if he maintained his innocence, created an untenable situation for his continued or future tenure in an institution dedicated to fighting maladministration.
Initiation of PAW Process: Following the unfolding legal situation, the DPR’s Commission II, responsible for overseeing the Ombudsman, initiated discussions regarding Hery Susanto’s replacement. The principle of public interest and maintaining the integrity of the Ombudsman institution would have guided these preliminary deliberations.
July 20, 2026 – Commission II Consultation: Puan Maharani reported that the leadership of Commission II had submitted the results of their deliberations regarding the selection and appointment of the PAW member for the Ombudsman RI for the 2026-2031 term. This submission occurred during a consultation meeting, which served as a substitute for a DPR Consultative Body (Bamus) meeting. In this session, Commission II would have reviewed the candidate list from the previous selection process and identified the next eligible candidate.
July 21, 2026 – DPR Plenary Meeting: The issue was brought before the full DPR in a Rapat Paripurna (Plenary Meeting). During this session, Speaker Puan Maharani formally presented Commission II’s recommendation for the PAW. She highlighted that based on the sequential numbering of candidates from the original fit and proper test for the Ombudsman RI, Wahidah Suaib, listed as candidate number 10, was the designated replacement. The plenary then proceeded to seek approval from all factions for the proposed replacement.
Formal Approval: The Rapat Paripurna formally approved the appointment of Wahidah Suaib as the interim replacement for the Ombudsman RI member for the 2026-2031 term. This final step cemented the decision and paved the way for Wahidah Suaib to assume her duties.

The PAW Process and Its Legal Framework

The Penggantian Antar Waktu (PAW) mechanism is a standard procedure in Indonesian legislative and institutional frameworks to ensure the continuity of public service when an elected or appointed official is unable to complete their term. For institutions like the Ombudsman, the PAW process is outlined in relevant laws and internal DPR regulations. It typically involves:

Notification of Vacancy: The institution or relevant state body informs the DPR of a vacancy due to resignation, death, permanent disability, or legal issues such as criminal indictment or conviction.
DPR Commission Review: The relevant DPR commission (in this case, Commission II) reviews the notification and assesses the grounds for the vacancy. They also refer to the original list of candidates who passed the fit and proper test for the position.
Candidate Selection: According to established procedures, the next highest-ranking candidate from the original pool who met all eligibility criteria and passed the fit and proper test is typically selected. This ensures that the replacement process is transparent and adheres to the merit-based selection originally conducted.
Commission Recommendation: The commission then forwards its recommendation to the DPR leadership.
Plenary Approval: The recommendation is presented to a DPR Plenary Meeting for final approval by all parliamentary factions. Once approved, the new member is officially appointed.

This structured process ensures legal compliance, maintains institutional stability, and upholds the integrity of the selection process even in unforeseen circumstances. The prompt execution of the PAW in Hery Susanto’s case demonstrates the DPR’s adherence to these procedures to safeguard the Ombudsman’s functionality and reputation.

Hery Susanto’s Corruption Case and Broader Context

The indictment of Hery Susanto for allegedly receiving Rp4.8 billion in bribes highlights a persistent challenge in Indonesia: corruption within public service. While Hery Susanto publicly denied the charges, stating, "Saya tidak terima uang" (I did not receive money), the formal indictment itself necessitates a strong response from the state apparatus. This amount, approximately equivalent to USD 300,000 (depending on prevailing exchange rates), represents a significant sum and, if proven, would constitute a serious breach of public trust.

Data from institutions like the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) consistently show that corruption remains a major impediment to Indonesia’s development and good governance. Various reports, including those from Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index, indicate that while Indonesia has made strides in combating corruption, challenges persist, particularly concerning bribery and abuse of power in public office. The involvement of officials from oversight bodies in such scandals is particularly damaging, as it undermines the very foundation of accountability and transparency that these institutions are meant to uphold. When those meant to guard against maladministration are themselves implicated, public cynicism can deepen, eroding trust in government and state institutions. This incident, therefore, serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle against corruption and the critical importance of integrity checks for all public officials, especially those in positions of trust.

Wahidah Suaib: The Designated Replacement

Wahidah Suaib, identified as candidate number 10 from the original selection process, now steps into this crucial role. While specific details about her background are not provided in the original article, her position on the eligibility list implies she underwent the same rigorous fit and proper test as other candidates and was deemed qualified for the position. Typically, individuals who reach this stage possess extensive experience in law, public administration, human rights, or related fields, often holding academic degrees, working as legal practitioners, or having a history of public service. Her appointment is a testament to the thoroughness of the initial selection process, which created a pool of qualified candidates ready to serve when needed. Her entry is expected to bring renewed focus and energy to the Ombudsman’s mandate, reinforcing the institution’s commitment to its mission despite the circumstances of her appointment.

Statements and Reactions

Speaker Puan Maharani’s statements during the plenary session underscored the procedural integrity of the DPR’s decision. "Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut pimpinan Komisi II telah menyampaikan hasil pembahasan pemilihan dan penetapan anggota pengganti antar waktu ombudsman RI masa jabatan 2026-2031 pada rapat konsultasi pengganti rapat bamus DPR RI tanggal 20 Juli 2026," she stated, emphasizing the formal steps taken. Her subsequent request for approval from the factions, "Untuk itu kami meminta persetujuan fraksi-fraksi apakah penetapan anggota pengganti antar waktu ombudsman RI masa jabatan 2026-2031 itu dapat disetujui," highlights the collective parliamentary endorsement of the decision.

While direct statements from the Ombudsman institution itself or anti-corruption bodies were not provided in the original text, it can be logically inferred that such bodies would welcome the swift resolution of the vacancy. The Ombudsman would likely issue a statement reaffirming its commitment to integrity and its mission, perhaps emphasizing that the institution remains steadfast in its role regardless of individual misconduct. Anti-corruption advocates and civil society organizations would likely praise the DPR’s decisive action, viewing it as a positive step towards maintaining ethical standards in public office and signaling that no position is immune from accountability. This event serves as a critical stress test for the integrity framework of public institutions, demonstrating that established mechanisms can effectively address ethical lapses.

Implications for Governance and Public Trust

The PAW of an Ombudsman member due to a corruption indictment carries significant implications for Indonesian governance and public trust.

Reinforcement of Accountability: The swift action by the DPR reinforces the principle that public officials, regardless of their position or the institution they represent, are accountable for their actions. It demonstrates that legal processes will take precedence when allegations of corruption arise, even for those in high-profile oversight roles.
Preservation of Institutional Integrity: For the Ombudsman RI, this decision is crucial for preserving its integrity and effectiveness. An institution tasked with fighting maladministration cannot afford to have its own members implicated in such serious ethical breaches. The replacement ensures that the Ombudsman can continue its work with renewed credibility and focus, free from the shadow of scandal.
Impact on Public Trust: Incidents of corruption involving public officials often erode public trust in government institutions. However, a decisive and transparent response, such as the PAW in this case, can help mitigate this damage. It signals to the public that mechanisms for accountability are functional and that misconduct will not be tolerated, potentially helping to restore faith in the system.
Strengthening Ethical Standards: This event serves as a powerful reminder to all public servants about the paramount importance of ethical conduct. It underscores that integrity is not merely a desirable trait but a fundamental requirement for anyone holding public office, especially in oversight and regulatory bodies.
Precedent for Future Cases: The handling of Hery Susanto’s replacement could set a precedent for how similar situations are managed in the future, further solidifying the framework for maintaining high ethical standards across various state institutions. It demonstrates a commitment to preventing individuals with compromised integrity from serving in critical public roles.

Conclusion

The DPR’s confirmation of Wahidah Suaib as the interim replacement for Hery Susanto in the Ombudsman RI for the 2026-2031 term represents a critical juncture in Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to uphold good governance and combat corruption. While the circumstances are regrettable, arising from a corruption indictment against a confirmed member, the decisive and procedural manner in which the replacement was handled underscores the strength of Indonesia’s institutional checks and balances. By ensuring that integrity remains a non-negotiable prerequisite for public service, particularly within an oversight body like the Ombudsman, the DPR has sent a clear message. This action is vital not only for the continued effectiveness and credibility of the Ombudsman but also for reinforcing public trust in the broader governmental framework, demonstrating that accountability and ethical conduct are cornerstones of a thriving democratic nation. The focus now shifts to Wahidah Suaib, who will undoubtedly be expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity and dedication in her crucial role to serve the Indonesian public.

July 21, 2026 0 comment