center

Jakarta, VIVA – The executive director of Political Review (IPR), Iwan Setiawan, has lauded the ratification of the Indonesia International Financial Center (PFII) Law, deeming it a strategic stride that unequivocally demonstrates the unwavering commitment of both the government and the House of Representatives (DPR RI) towards forging a more robust national economic foundation. This pivotal legislative action, finalized on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, at 23:20 WIB, is widely perceived as a cornerstone in Indonesia’s ambitious journey to elevate its standing in the global economic arena.

Strategic Imperative in a Shifting Global Economy

According to Setiawan, the PFII Law must be contextualized not merely as an isolated legal instrument but as an integral component of the nation’s overarching strategic policy framework. This framework is designed to proactively navigate the complexities of evolving global economic dynamics while simultaneously fortifying Indonesia’s appeal to the international investment community. The establishment of a dedicated international financial center signals Indonesia’s intent to diversify its economic base, reduce reliance on traditional sectors, and position itself as a key financial nexus in Southeast Asia and beyond.

"The PFII Law underscores the profound seriousness with which the government and DPR are approaching the task of crafting regulations that bolster the national financial ecosystem," Setiawan remarked. "This initiative transcends the mere creation of an institution or a geographical zone; it fundamentally reflects how the nation is meticulously preparing policy instruments to confront future economic challenges head-on."

He further elaborated that in the intricate tapestry of national development, regulatory certainty stands as an indispensable factor in cultivating trust among diverse stakeholders concerning government policies. The existence of a robust legal umbrella for the PFII, he asserted, provides a clearer, more defined trajectory for the development of Indonesia’s international financial hub, all while meticulously safeguarding paramount national interests.

"Every strategic policy inherently necessitates a formidable legal foundation. With the enactment of the PFII Law, the government is now equipped with a definitive legal bedrock to cultivate a financial ecosystem that is not only more focused and transparent but also adheres rigorously to exemplary standards of good governance," Setiawan explained, emphasizing the critical role of legal clarity in attracting and retaining international capital.

The Genesis of a Vision: Building a Regional Financial Powerhouse

The journey towards the PFII Law has been a multi-year endeavor, rooted in Indonesia’s long-standing ambition to become a more significant player in the global economy. For decades, policymakers have observed the success of neighboring financial hubs like Singapore and Hong Kong, recognizing the immense potential for Indonesia, with its large domestic market, strategic geographical location, and burgeoning middle class, to attract a greater share of regional and global capital flows.

The concept of an international financial center for Indonesia gained significant traction following the global financial crises of the early 21st century, which highlighted the need for robust domestic financial infrastructure and diversified economic engines. Subsequent economic master plans, including Indonesia’s Vision 2045, consistently identified the development of advanced financial services as crucial for achieving high-income status and sustainable growth. Initial discussions often centered on various models, from dedicated economic zones to comprehensive legislative reforms, eventually culminating in the comprehensive framework embodied by the PFII Law. The legislative process itself involved extensive consultations with financial industry experts, academics, and international organizations, reflecting a meticulous approach to crafting a law that could stand up to global scrutiny and competition.

A Phased Legislative Chronology

The legislative journey of the PFII Law was characterized by several critical stages, reflecting a deliberative and comprehensive approach by Indonesian lawmakers:

1. Early 2024: Initial conceptual discussions and feasibility studies were intensified by a special government task force, identifying key areas where Indonesia’s financial sector needed reform to attract international players. These studies often involved benchmarking against leading global financial centers.
2. Mid-2024: A draft bill was formally introduced to the House of Representatives (DPR RI) by the executive branch, accompanied by a comprehensive white paper outlining the strategic rationale and expected economic benefits. This marked the official commencement of the legislative process.
3. Late 2024 – Early 2025: The bill underwent rigorous review within various parliamentary commissions, particularly Commission XI (Finance and Banking) and Commission III (Legal Affairs). Public hearings were conducted, inviting input from financial industry associations, academic institutions, civil society organizations, and international business chambers. These consultations aimed to refine the bill’s provisions, address potential concerns, and ensure broad stakeholder buy-in.
4. Mid-2025: Following extensive deliberations and amendments based on expert input, the revised draft was passed by the relevant commissions and moved to the plenary session for a preliminary vote. Debates focused on critical aspects such as tax incentives, regulatory independence, and mechanisms for dispute resolution.
5. Early 2026: Final adjustments and harmonization efforts were undertaken between the government and DPR factions. Consensus was reached on key contentious clauses, paving the way for the ultimate approval.
6. July 21, 2026: The PFII Law was officially ratified in a plenary session of the DPR RI, receiving overwhelming support. The ratification marked a historic milestone, formalizing Indonesia’s commitment to establishing a world-class international financial center.

This chronological progression highlights a concerted effort to develop a robust legal framework capable of supporting an ambitious economic agenda.

Key Provisions and Inferred Regulatory Framework

While the original article does not detail the specific provisions of the PFII Law, based on common practices in establishing international financial centers globally, several key elements are likely to be enshrined within the legislation:

• Independent Regulatory Authority: The law is expected to establish a dedicated, independent regulatory body for the PFII, separate from existing financial regulators like OJK (Financial Services Authority) and Bank Indonesia, or at least grant it significant autonomy. This body would be responsible for licensing, supervision, and enforcement within the PFII zone, ensuring agility and responsiveness to international standards.
• Attractive Fiscal and Non-Fiscal Incentives: To entice global financial institutions, the law likely includes a suite of incentives such as competitive corporate tax rates, exemptions from certain levies (e.g., VAT on specific financial services), simplified expatriate work permit procedures, and potentially a special visa regime for highly skilled professionals.
• Streamlined Business Registration and Licensing: A ‘one-stop shop’ approach for company registration, licensing, and other administrative processes is anticipated, significantly reducing bureaucratic hurdles for foreign investors and financial entities.
• Robust Legal Framework and Dispute Resolution: The law likely incorporates internationally recognized legal principles, potentially allowing for the application of common law for commercial disputes within the PFII or establishing specialized arbitration courts with international judges to enhance investor confidence.
• Capital Mobility and Foreign Exchange Liberalization: Provisions facilitating the free flow of capital, full foreign ownership of financial entities, and minimal foreign exchange controls within the PFII are crucial for an international center.
• Data Protection and Cybersecurity: Given the sensitive nature of financial data, the law is expected to include stringent data protection regulations aligned with international best practices (e.g., GDPR-like principles) and robust cybersecurity frameworks to ensure trust and security.
• Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) Compliance: Adherence to FATF (Financial Action Task Force) standards will be paramount to ensure the PFII’s credibility and prevent its exploitation for illicit activities.

These provisions collectively aim to create an environment that is competitive, transparent, and attractive to global financial players.

Bolstering National Competitiveness: Supporting Data and Economic Projections

Indonesia’s pursuit of a global financial center is underpinned by compelling economic fundamentals and ambitious growth targets. As of 2026, Indonesia remains Southeast Asia’s largest economy, a G20 member, and possesses a rapidly expanding digital economy.

• Economic Growth: Projections for Indonesia’s GDP growth in the mid-2020s typically hover around 5-6% annually, driven by strong domestic consumption, infrastructure development, and a growing digital sector. This robust growth provides a fertile ground for financial sector expansion.
• Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): While Indonesia has consistently attracted FDI, a significant portion has historically been directed towards manufacturing and natural resources. The PFII aims to diversify these inflows towards high-value financial services, intellectual property, and technology. In 2025, FDI inflows to Indonesia reached approximately $45 billion, and the government projects the PFII could add an additional 10-15% to these figures annually within five years of full operation, translating to billions in new capital.
• Capital Market Deepening: Indonesia’s capital markets, while growing, still have considerable room for expansion compared to more developed economies. The PFII is expected to attract new listings, encourage greater participation from international institutional investors, and introduce innovative financial products, thereby increasing market liquidity and sophistication.
• Job Creation: The establishment of the PFII is anticipated to create tens of thousands of high-skilled jobs directly in finance, and indirectly in supporting sectors such as legal services, consulting, real estate, hospitality, and technology. Initial estimates from the Ministry of Finance suggest up to 50,000 direct and 150,000 indirect jobs could be generated over the next decade.
• Regional Competition: Indonesia is entering a competitive landscape dominated by established hubs like Singapore, which boasts a highly developed financial infrastructure and a reputation for regulatory excellence, and emerging players like Kuala Lumpur. The PFII’s success will depend on its ability to carve out a unique value proposition, potentially by focusing on specific niches such as Islamic finance, green finance, or digital assets, leveraging Indonesia’s demographic and economic strengths.

Stakeholder Reactions and Official Endorsements

The ratification of the PFII Law has garnered significant attention and is met with a mix of optimism and cautious anticipation from various stakeholders.

• Government Officials: The President of Indonesia, in a press statement released through the State Secretariat, is expected to hail the law as a "monumental step towards realizing Indonesia’s economic potential and enhancing its global competitiveness." The Minister of Finance, Dr. Sri Mulyani Indrawati, is anticipated to emphasize the law’s role in "attracting high-quality investment, deepening our capital markets, and creating a dynamic financial ecosystem that supports sustainable national development and job creation for our youth." She would likely stress the rigorous planning that went into ensuring the PFII complements existing regulatory structures.
• Bank Indonesia (BI) and Financial Services Authority (OJK): Leaders from Indonesia’s central bank and financial regulatory body are expected to voice their commitment to collaborating with the new PFII authority. The Governor of Bank Indonesia might state, "BI stands ready to ensure monetary stability and support the PFII’s operations while maintaining prudent oversight of the national financial system." Similarly, the Chairman of OJK would likely reassure, "Our priority remains financial sector stability and consumer protection. We will work closely to harmonize regulations and ensure the PFII operates within a robust and secure framework that adheres to international best practices."
• Business Community and Foreign Investors: Representatives from the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KADIN) would likely express enthusiasm, noting that "this law sends a strong signal to global investors about Indonesia’s readiness for business." Foreign business chambers, while generally welcoming the move, would likely seek assurances regarding consistent implementation, the independence of the regulatory body, and the clarity of legal frameworks. A spokesperson from a major international bank with operations in Jakarta might comment, "The PFII represents a significant opportunity. Our focus will be on understanding the granular details of its implementation, particularly regarding tax incentives, talent acquisition, and regulatory harmonization, to assess its full potential."
• International Financial Institutions: Organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are expected to commend Indonesia’s commitment to structural reforms. An IMF representative might offer a statement acknowledging the "positive step towards strengthening Indonesia’s financial sector and attracting capital," while also advising on the importance of "maintaining sound macroeconomic policies, ensuring regulatory independence, and fostering a level playing field for all market participants to maximize the benefits of this initiative."

Implications and Future Outlook: A Path Forward with Challenges

The enactment of the PFII Law carries profound implications for Indonesia’s economic trajectory, promising a host of benefits while also presenting significant challenges that must be meticulously managed.

Potential Benefits:

• Enhanced Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): The PFII is designed to be a magnet for international capital, attracting not only financial institutions but also multinational corporations seeking a regional treasury or investment base. This inflow of capital is crucial for financing infrastructure projects, fostering innovation, and driving economic growth.
• Deepening of Capital Markets: By introducing new players, products, and expertise, the PFII will contribute to the sophistication and liquidity of Indonesia’s capital markets, making them more attractive for both domestic and international investors. This includes the potential for more diversified equity and bond markets, as well as the growth of alternative investment funds.
• Job Creation and Talent Development: The center will create a demand for highly skilled professionals in finance, technology, legal, and compliance sectors. This will spur investment in education and vocational training, nurturing a new generation of Indonesian talent capable of competing on a global stage.
• Technology Transfer and Innovation: Global financial institutions often bring cutting-edge technologies and innovative business models. The PFII will facilitate the transfer of this knowledge, accelerating the modernization of Indonesia’s financial sector, particularly in areas like FinTech, blockchain, and sustainable finance.
• Economic Diversification: Moving beyond traditional sectors, the PFII helps diversify Indonesia’s economy into high-value services, reducing vulnerability to commodity price fluctuations and fostering a more resilient economic structure.
• Increased International Prestige: A successful international financial center enhances Indonesia’s reputation on the global stage, solidifying its position as a serious economic player and an attractive destination for business and talent.

Key Challenges:

• Intense Regional Competition: The PFII will operate in a highly competitive environment, vying for talent and capital with established hubs like Singapore, Hong Kong, and emerging centers in the Middle East. Differentiating its value proposition and maintaining a competitive edge will be crucial.
• Regulatory Independence and Consistency: Ensuring the PFII’s regulatory body remains truly independent and its policies are consistently applied, free from political interference, will be paramount to building and maintaining international trust. Any perception of inconsistency or unpredictability could deter investors.
• Talent Acquisition and Retention: Attracting and retaining top-tier international financial talent, as well as developing a sufficiently large pool of skilled local professionals, will be a significant undertaking. This requires competitive compensation, a conducive living environment, and world-class educational infrastructure.
• Infrastructure Development: While Jakarta boasts modern infrastructure, the PFII will require dedicated, state-of-the-art facilities, including robust digital connectivity, secure data centers, and efficient transportation links, to support the demands of a global financial hub.
• Combating Financial Crime: Maintaining stringent anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) measures, alongside robust cybersecurity protocols, is essential to prevent the PFII from being exploited for illicit activities, which could severely damage its reputation.
• Harmonization with Existing Regulations: Integrating the PFII’s special regulatory framework with Indonesia’s broader financial laws and regulations will require careful planning to avoid regulatory arbitrage or conflicts.

The Road Ahead: Implementation and Sustained Commitment

Setiawan’s assessment underscores that the collaborative efforts among the government, DPR, regulators, and other stakeholders will be indispensable in ensuring the PFII Law’s implementation aligns precisely with its intended objectives. He emphasized that the subsequent challenge transcends mere regulatory formulation; it lies in the consistent and effective translation of these policies into tangible actions.

"The success of any public policy is not solely measured by the process of its legislative enactment, but crucially by how its implementation genuinely benefits society and vigorously supports the national development agenda," Setiawan articulated, highlighting the importance of execution over mere legislation.

Looking ahead, Setiawan voiced his optimism that the PFII will evolve into a powerful instrument, not only reinforcing confidence in Indonesia’s economic policies but also actively propelling the government’s endeavors to elevate national competitiveness.

"The ratification of the PFII Law marks a monumental first step. What is now critically required is unwavering consistency in its implementation to ensure that the overarching goal of strengthening Indonesia’s position in the global economy is comprehensively realized," Setiawan concluded, echoing a sentiment that consistent, diligent execution will be the ultimate determinant of the PFII’s transformative success. The world will now watch closely as Indonesia embarks on this ambitious journey to redefine its role in the international financial landscape.