Pevita Pearce - Sugramedia
Home Author
Author

Pevita Pearce

Health and Wellness

GAMKI Lawyers Assert Report Against Jusuf Kalla Aims for Legal Resolution, Not Punishment

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

JAKARTA – The legal representative for the Indonesian Christian Youth Movement (GAMKI), Stein Siahaan, has clarified that a report filed against former Vice President Jusuf Kalla (JK) is not intended to punish the statesman. Instead, Siahaan stated that the action aims to channel and address the social media discourse surrounding Kalla’s remarks into a formal legal process.

"Our intention here is not to punish Mr. JK. We are merely seeking to have the public discourse that has occurred on social media addressed through legal channels," Siahaan explained during an appearance on the iNews program "Rakyat Bersuara" (The People Speak) on Tuesday, May 12, 2026.

The report was lodged with the Polda Metro Jaya (Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Police) by the Executive Board of GAMKI, in conjunction with other Christian organizations and civil society groups. The controversy stems from remarks made by Jusuf Kalla regarding "martyrdom" during a lecture at the Gadjah Mada University (UGM) Mosque, which subsequently went viral and sparked widespread debate on social media platforms.

Siahaan emphasized the importance of respecting the ongoing legal proceedings, urging all parties to refrain from escalating the issue through further social media polemics. He warned that unchecked online discussions could lead to a larger, more significant horizontal conflict within society. "Let us respect the legal process rather than engaging in polemics on social media, which could lead to a larger horizontal conflict. We are placing this within the legal process," Siahaan asserted.

He further articulated that if the legal process ultimately finds Jusuf Kalla not guilty, it would serve as a definitive confirmation that he did not commit any wrongdoing as alleged. "If, indeed, the legal process later declares Mr. JK not guilty, then it is firm that he is not guilty," he concluded.

Background of the Report and Social Media Outcry

The report against Jusuf Kalla by GAMKI and allied organizations centers on statements made during a lecture that have been interpreted by some as potentially inciting or problematic. While the exact phrasing and context of Kalla’s remarks have been a subject of intense online discussion, the core of the complaint appears to revolve around the implications of his words in a public forum.

The rapid spread of the lecture’s content via social media platforms amplified the issue, transforming it from a localized discussion into a national talking point. This rapid dissemination, coupled with varying interpretations and reactions, created a significant "kegaduhan" (commotion or disturbance) online, as described by Siahaan. This is the very situation GAMKI seeks to address through formal legal channels.

Pengacara GAMKI Tegaskan Laporan Terhadap JK Bukan Berniat Menghukum

Chronology of Events (Inferred)

While a precise timeline of all events is not detailed in the provided information, the general sequence of events can be inferred:

  • Undated Event: Jusuf Kalla delivers a lecture at the UGM Mosque, during which he makes remarks concerning "martyrdom."
  • Undated Post-Lecture: Portions of the lecture, likely focusing on the controversial statements, are shared and disseminated across various social media platforms.
  • Viral Spread: The content gains significant traction online, sparking widespread discussion, debate, and varying interpretations among the public.
  • May 12, 2026: Stein Siahaan, representing GAMKI, appears on iNews program "Rakyat Bersuara" to explain the organization’s stance on the report filed against Jusuf Kalla.
  • Prior to May 12, 2026: GAMKI, along with other Christian and community organizations, formally lodges a report against Jusuf Kalla at Polda Metro Jaya.

Supporting Data and Legal Context

The legal action taken by GAMKI falls under Indonesian law, likely pertaining to defamation, hate speech, or potentially inciting unrest, depending on the specific charges pursued. The Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE) are common legal frameworks used in such cases.

Relevant Legal Provisions (Illustrative – specific charges not stated):

  • Defamation: Articles related to defamation could be invoked if Kalla’s remarks are perceived as damaging to the reputation of individuals or groups.
  • Hate Speech: Provisions within UU ITE or the KUHP might be applicable if the remarks are deemed to incite hatred or discrimination based on religion, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics.
  • Incitement: Laws concerning incitement to public disorder or violence could also be relevant, though typically require a higher threshold of demonstrable intent and impact.

The decision to file a report with the police signifies a desire to engage the formal justice system. This process typically involves an investigation by law enforcement, the gathering of evidence, potential questioning of witnesses and the accused, and ultimately, a decision on whether to proceed with prosecution.

Broader Implications and Societal Impact

The case highlights a recurring tension in Indonesia between freedom of speech and the need to maintain public order and inter-religious harmony. The widespread use of social media as a platform for disseminating information and opinions has amplified the impact of public figures’ statements, often leading to rapid and intense public reactions.

Analysis of Implications:

  • Role of Social Media: The incident underscores the potent influence of social media in shaping public discourse and potentially escalating societal divisions. The ease with which content can go viral necessitates a careful approach to public communication by prominent figures.
  • Legal Recourse vs. Public Dialogue: GAMKI’s stance represents a deliberate choice to utilize legal avenues to address what they perceive as harmful online discourse. This contrasts with purely public or social media-based responses, aiming for a more structured and definitive resolution.
  • Inter-Group Relations: The involvement of multiple Christian organizations suggests a concern for the potential impact of Kalla’s remarks on inter-religious relations. The legal process, in this context, is seen as a way to clarify the situation and prevent further polarization.
  • Precedent for Future Cases: The outcome of this report could set a precedent for how similar situations involving public figures and religiously sensitive statements are handled in Indonesia. It raises questions about accountability, the interpretation of religious discourse in public, and the boundaries of free expression.
  • Importance of Due Process: Siahaan’s emphasis on respecting the legal process is crucial. It signals a commitment to due process and the principle that individuals should be judged through established legal mechanisms rather than through public outcry or social media consensus.

The legal proceedings, when initiated, will likely involve examining the exact context of Kalla’s statements, the intent behind them, and their actual impact on the public. The legal framework will then be applied to determine whether any violations have occurred. The decision to pursue legal action, as articulated by GAMKI’s lawyer, is aimed at bringing clarity and resolution to a situation that has become a significant point of contention in the public sphere, ultimately seeking to prevent further societal fragmentation.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
National News

BNPB Reports Dozens of Homes Damaged by High Sea Waves in Central Sulawesi

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

JAKARTA – A total of fifteen residential units in Banggai Laut Regency, Central Sulawesi, sustained significant damage after being battered by high sea waves in the early hours of Saturday, April 18. Of the affected structures, eight were classified as severely damaged, while the remaining seven suffered light damage. The incident, which struck while residents were asleep, underscores the persistent vulnerability of Indonesia’s extensive coastal communities to natural hazards, particularly in regions susceptible to extreme weather phenomena exacerbated by climate change.

High Waves Batter Central Sulawesi Coast

The destructive waves, occurring around 03:00 Central Indonesia Time (WITA), brought chaos to an otherwise serene night. Abdul Muhari, Head of the Data, Information and Communication Center for Disaster at the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), confirmed the extent of the damage. The affected homes are primarily located along the coastline of Kendek Village in North Banggai District, and Lambako and Pasir Putih Villages in Banggai District. These areas, characterized by their proximity to the sea, are integral to the local economy and culture but also bear the brunt of marine-related natural disasters.

Initial assessments conducted by the Quick Reaction Team of the local Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) in Banggai Laut revealed that the severely damaged houses were predominantly constructed from less resilient materials such as wooden planks, with roofs made from woven coconut or nipah leaves. This common building practice in many coastal communities, while traditional and resource-efficient, renders homes highly susceptible to the destructive force of powerful waves and tidal surges. The immediate priority for the BPBD team has been to evaluate the full scope of the damage and to identify any lingering threats posed by the accompanying tidal floods (rob) and persistent high waves. While the specific conditions of the 15 affected families were not detailed in the initial BNPB report, assurances were made that they are receiving immediate assistance and support from the Banggai Laut BPBD Quick Reaction Team, encompassing needs assessments, emergency relief, and psychosocial support.

Chronology of the Overnight Disaster

The genesis of the high wave event can be traced to a confluence of meteorological and oceanographic conditions common in the Indonesian archipelago during certain periods. Although specific weather advisories directly preceding this event for Banggai Laut were not explicitly mentioned in the initial report, the Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) routinely issues maritime warnings for various sea zones across Indonesia. Coastal communities are generally aware of periods of rough seas, but the intensity and timing of this particular event caught many off guard.

In the hours leading up to the disaster, the sea conditions, while possibly rough, did not immediately signal an imminent threat of such magnitude. However, by approximately 03:00 WITA, residents reported a sudden and dramatic shift. The tranquility of the pre-dawn hours was abruptly shattered by the thunderous roar of powerful waves crashing against the shore. Eyewitness accounts, gathered from subsequent reports and typical narratives of such events, describe residents being jolted awake by the violent impacts, followed by the terrifying sight of water inundating their homes. The darkness compounded the panic, making it difficult for families to assess the situation or secure their belongings. Many were forced to evacuate in haste, seeking higher ground or the safety of neighbours’ homes that stood further inland or were more robustly built.

As dawn broke, the full extent of the devastation became starkly visible. Debris from shattered homes, personal belongings, and uprooted vegetation littered the coastline. The morning light also facilitated the arrival of the local BPBD Quick Reaction Team, who immediately commenced their crucial work of assessing the damage, collecting data on affected households, and coordinating initial relief efforts. This rapid response is critical in the immediate aftermath of such disasters, focusing on ensuring the safety of residents, providing emergency shelter, food, and medical attention, and preventing secondary hazards. The lack of detailed information on specific injuries or fatalities in the initial report suggests that the community’s swift reaction or sheer fortune averted a greater human toll, although the psychological impact on those who lost their homes remains significant.

Banggai Laut: A Region Prone to Coastal Hazards

Banggai Laut Regency is an administrative division located in the southeastern part of Central Sulawesi Province. It comprises a group of islands, making its entire population inherently coastal. This geographical characteristic, while fostering unique marine-dependent livelihoods, simultaneously exposes its communities to a heightened risk of various maritime hazards, including high waves, tidal floods, and potential tsunamis. The regency’s low-lying coastal plains and numerous small islands mean that human settlements are often built directly on the shore, placing them squarely in the path of any significant oceanographic disturbance.

Geographical Vulnerability and Community Livelihoods
The primary livelihoods in Banggai Laut are inextricably linked to the sea, with fishing and seaweed farming being dominant economic activities. Many residents also engage in small-scale coastal agriculture. This dependence often necessitates living in close proximity to the water, leading to the construction of homes in vulnerable zones. The traditional architecture, often employing readily available local materials like wood and palm leaves, is well-suited to the tropical climate but offers limited structural integrity against powerful natural forces. The absence of robust seawalls or adequate buffer zones in many areas further exacerbates the risk, allowing the full force of the ocean to directly impact residential areas.

The archipelagic nature of Banggai Laut also means that inter-island connectivity is vital, and disruption to sea routes due to rough weather can isolate communities, complicating relief efforts. The topography of the region, with its relatively shallow coastal waters, can also influence wave dynamics, potentially amplifying their destructive power as they approach the shore.

Historical Context and Climate Change Implications
Indonesia, situated in the Pacific Ring of Fire and straddling the equator, is no stranger to natural disasters. Central Sulawesi, in particular, has experienced its share of seismic and meteorological events, including the devastating 2018 earthquake and tsunami that struck Palu. While this particular incident was not seismically induced, it highlights the broader vulnerability of the region. High waves are a recurring phenomenon, often linked to seasonal monsoons or specific weather systems like tropical depressions forming in adjacent seas.

Climate change is increasingly recognized as a critical factor exacerbating these coastal hazards. Rising sea levels mean that even normal high tides can reach further inland, and storm surges or high waves now occur atop an elevated baseline, increasing their destructive potential. Changes in global weather patterns can also lead to more frequent or intense extreme weather events, including stronger winds and more volatile sea conditions. For communities like those in Banggai Laut, these global phenomena translate into direct, tangible threats to their homes, livelihoods, and safety. The need for climate change adaptation strategies, including the development of more resilient coastal infrastructure and community-based disaster risk reduction programs, has become paramount.

Government Response and Humanitarian Aid

The immediate aftermath of the high wave incident saw a coordinated response from various levels of government and humanitarian organizations, aimed at mitigating further suffering and facilitating recovery.

BNPB and BPBD Lead Emergency Operations
As the national coordinating body for disaster management, BNPB, through its spokesperson Abdul Muhari, quickly disseminated information regarding the incident, ensuring national awareness and resource mobilization. The primary on-the-ground response, however, was led by the Banggai Laut BPBD. Their Quick Reaction Team played a pivotal role in the initial hours and days following the disaster. Their responsibilities included:

  1. Damage Assessment: Systematically surveying the affected areas to document the extent of structural damage to homes and public infrastructure, crucial for determining aid requirements.
  2. Needs Assessment: Identifying the immediate humanitarian needs of the 15 affected families, including shelter, food, clean water, blankets, clothing, and medical supplies.
  3. Coordination: Liaising with other local government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and community groups to ensure a streamlined and effective relief effort. This includes coordinating logistics for the distribution of aid and potentially identifying safe temporary relocation sites.
  4. Monitoring: Continuously monitoring sea conditions and weather forecasts from BMKG to provide timely warnings and prevent further casualties or damage.
  5. Psychosocial Support: Recognizing the trauma associated with losing one’s home and experiencing a sudden disaster, BPBD teams, often with the support of social affairs agencies, provide initial psychosocial first aid to affected individuals and families.

Local Authorities Pledge Support and Long-term Recovery
Beyond the immediate emergency response, the local government of Banggai Laut Regency is expected to play a crucial role in the medium-to-long-term recovery phase. Statements from local officials, while not explicitly detailed in the initial report, typically involve pledges of financial assistance for rebuilding, provision of building materials, and support for livelihood restoration. For severely damaged homes, the government might explore options for relocating residents to safer, more resilient areas, although this often presents significant social and cultural challenges.

Collaboration with the Ministry of Social Affairs is vital for providing sustained humanitarian assistance, including temporary shelters, food aid, and psychosocial counseling. The Ministry of Health would typically ensure the provision of medical services and public health surveillance to prevent outbreaks of waterborne diseases that can occur in post-flood environments. Furthermore, the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) and National Police (Polri) often provide logistical support, security, and manpower for debris clearance and aid distribution, especially in remote or difficult-to-access areas. The collective effort aims not just at immediate relief but at fostering a more resilient community capable of withstanding future hazards.

The Broader Impact and Future Preparedness

The high wave incident in Banggai Laut, while localized in its immediate physical impact, carries broader implications for disaster risk reduction strategies and sustainable development in Indonesia’s vast coastal regions.

Economic Disruption and Community Resilience
For the 15 affected families, the loss of their homes represents not just a personal tragedy but a significant economic setback. Many coastal residents rely on daily earnings from fishing or small businesses, and the destruction of their homes often means the loss of their tools, equipment, and stock. The disruption to livelihoods can be profound, pushing vulnerable families further into poverty. The long-term recovery process will require sustained support to help these families rebuild not only their homes but also their economic stability. This includes vocational training, microfinance schemes, and assistance in replacing lost fishing gear or farming implements.

Community resilience, however, is a strong characteristic of Indonesian coastal populations. Neighbors often come together to assist those most affected, sharing resources and labor for initial cleanup and temporary repairs. This informal network of support is a critical first line of defense and recovery, complementing formal government aid.

Towards Enhanced Coastal Protection and Early Warning Systems
The incident serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for enhanced coastal protection measures across vulnerable areas of Indonesia. This includes the construction of robust seawalls, the restoration and planting of mangrove forests (which act as natural barriers against storm surges and erosion), and the implementation of sustainable spatial planning that discourages building in highly exposed zones. Investing in nature-based solutions like mangroves offers the dual benefit of environmental conservation and disaster mitigation.

Equally crucial is the improvement of early warning systems. While BMKG issues general maritime warnings, these need to be effectively translated into actionable information at the community level. This requires:

  1. Localized Forecasts: More granular and specific weather and wave forecasts for particular coastal segments.
  2. Effective Dissemination: Robust communication channels to ensure warnings reach even the most remote communities quickly and clearly, utilizing various media from radio and mobile alerts to community leaders and religious institutions.
  3. Community Education: Continuous public awareness campaigns to educate residents on the meaning of warnings, appropriate evacuation routes, and what actions to take during a coastal emergency.
  4. Drills and Preparedness Plans: Regular disaster drills and the development of community-level emergency plans, ensuring that residents know how to react when a warning is issued.

The Banggai Laut incident underscores the multifaceted challenges faced by coastal communities in the era of climate change. While immediate relief is paramount, a long-term vision focusing on resilient infrastructure, robust early warning systems, climate change adaptation, and sustained community empowerment is essential to protect lives and livelihoods from the relentless forces of nature. The experience of the 15 families in Banggai Laut is a powerful call to action for comprehensive disaster risk reduction across the Indonesian archipelago.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Politics and Governance

Bareskrim Polri Dismantles Illegal Nitrous Oxide Production Facility in Jakarta Generating Billions in Monthly Revenue from Whip Pink Distribution

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

The Indonesian National Police’s Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim Polri), specifically the Directorate of Narcotics Crimes (Dittipidnarkoba), has successfully dismantled a clandestine laboratory and distribution hub dedicated to the production of illegal Nitrous Oxide (N2O) canisters. Operating under the brand name "Whip Pink," the illegal facility located in Jakarta was reportedly generating a staggering monthly turnover in the billions of rupiah. This high-profile raid marks a significant escalation in the government’s efforts to curb the recreational abuse of "laughing gas," which has recently surged in popularity across urban centers and social media platforms.

The operation was spearheaded by Brigadier General Eko Hadi Santoso, Director of Narcotics Crimes at Bareskrim Polri. According to official reports, the breakthrough came after an intensive investigation into the supply chain of the "Whip Pink" brand, which had become ubiquitous in certain nightlife circles and online marketplaces. The police utilized a "controlled purchase" or "undercover buy" strategy to trace the movement of the canisters from retail points back to their source. This methodical approach eventually led investigators to a non-descript shophouse (ruko) in Jakarta that served as both a refilling station and a distribution warehouse for the hazardous substance.

The Undercover Operation and the Raid on the Jakarta Shophouse

The investigation into the Whip Pink syndicate began following reports of widespread distribution of N2O canisters that lacked the necessary permits from the Ministry of Health and the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency (BPOM). Brigadier General Eko Hadi Santoso explained that the Sub-Directorate III of the Dittipidnarkoba Bareskrim Polri initiated the sting operation by posing as potential bulk buyers. Through these interactions, the team was able to identify the logistics network and the specific location where the canisters were being filled and packaged.

Upon securing sufficient evidence and identifying the operational headquarters, the police moved in for the raid on Wednesday, April 15, 2026. The facility was found to be a sophisticated operation, equipped with large-scale industrial tanks used to decant N2O into smaller, consumer-ready canisters. The "Whip Pink" branding, characterized by its distinctive pink color and stylized font, was applied on-site to make the product more appealing to a younger demographic.

During the penggerebekan (raid), law enforcement officers seized more than 2,000 canisters of Whip Pink. The inventory included a variety of sizes, ranging from small "chargers" to large industrial-sized tanks. Specifically, the police confiscated filled canisters ready for distribution, thousands of empty canisters awaiting processing, and the specialized machinery used for the high-pressure filling of the gas. The sheer volume of the seized goods underscores the industrial scale of the operation and the high demand for the product in the local market.

Bareskrim Gerebek Pabrik Whip Pink Ilegal di Jakarta, Omzet Tembus Miliaran Rupiah

Scale of Operations and Seizure of Evidence

The financial scale of the illegal enterprise is one of the most alarming aspects of the case. Initial estimates by Bareskrim Polri suggest that the facility was clearing billions of rupiah in profit every month. This revenue was driven by a sophisticated distribution model that combined direct sales to entertainment venues with aggressive marketing on e-commerce platforms. By bypassing legal regulations and safety standards, the operators were able to maintain high profit margins while undercutting legitimate suppliers who adhere to strict industrial or medical-grade protocols.

The evidence seized at the Jakarta shophouse provides a clear picture of the syndicate’s operational capacity. In addition to the 2,000 canisters, police found ledgers detailing a vast network of distributors and regular clients. The presence of specialized filling equipment suggests that the gas was likely sourced in bulk—possibly under the guise of legitimate industrial use—and then diverted into the illegal "Whip Pink" canisters for recreational consumption.

Understanding Nitrous Oxide: Between Culinary Utility and Recreational Hazard

Nitrous Oxide, commonly known as N2O or "laughing gas," is a colorless, non-flammable gas with a slightly sweet odor and taste. In legitimate industries, it serves two primary purposes: medical and culinary. Medically, it is used as an anesthetic and analgesic, particularly in dentistry and emergency medicine. In the food industry, it is used as a propellant for whipped cream and in "molecular gastronomy" to create foams and infusions.

However, the substance has a long history of recreational abuse. When inhaled, N2O induces a short-lived state of euphoria, relaxation, and dissociation. It is this "high" that has made it a popular "party drug" globally. In Indonesia, the brand "Whip Pink" has become synonymous with this trend. Unlike medical-grade N2O, which is administered with oxygen to prevent hypoxia, the gas sold in illegal canisters is often concentrated and inhaled directly from balloons or the canisters themselves, posing severe health risks.

The Rise of Whip Pink in Indonesian Social Media Circles

The "Whip Pink" brand gained significant notoriety in Indonesia after appearing in various viral social media posts. The product’s aesthetic—bright pink canisters that look more like a lifestyle accessory than a chemical container—helped it penetrate youth culture. The involvement of social media influencers and celebrities has further complicated the narrative. For instance, recent viral footage allegedly showing "Whip Pink" canisters at the residence of prominent figure Reza Arap sparked intense public debate.

The reaction from other public figures, such as Awkarin, whose "surprising" response to the footage went viral, highlighted the normalization of the substance in certain affluent circles. This cultural visibility has made the task of law enforcement more urgent, as the perception of N2O as a "harmless" substance contradicts the clinical reality of its long-term effects. Bareskrim’s raid on the production facility is a direct response to this growing trend, aiming to cut off the supply at its root before it becomes a full-blown public health crisis.

Bareskrim Gerebek Pabrik Whip Pink Ilegal di Jakarta, Omzet Tembus Miliaran Rupiah

Health Risks: The Silent Danger of N2O Inhalation

The enrichment of this news report requires a deep dive into why the illegal production of Whip Pink is a matter of national security and public health. Medical experts warn that chronic inhalation of Nitrous Oxide can lead to devastating neurological consequences. One of the primary mechanisms of injury is the inactivation of Vitamin B12 in the body. Vitamin B12 is essential for the maintenance of the myelin sheath, which protects nerve fibers.

Prolonged abuse can lead to subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord, a condition that manifests as numbness in the extremities, loss of balance, and in severe cases, permanent paralysis. Furthermore, because the gas displaces oxygen in the lungs, users run the risk of hypoxia (oxygen deprivation), which can cause sudden fainting, heart attacks, or brain damage. The illegal nature of "Whip Pink" means there is no quality control; the gas could be contaminated with industrial impurities that further increase the toxicity of the substance.

Legal Ramifications and Regulatory Oversight in Indonesia

The legal status of N2O in Indonesia exists in a complex regulatory framework. While it is not classified as a "narcotic" under the restrictive Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, its distribution for recreational use falls under several other legal violations. The operators of the Jakarta factory are likely to face charges under the Health Law (Undang-Undang Kesehatan), which prohibits the distribution of pharmaceutical or chemical substances without proper permits and for purposes other than their intended use.

Furthermore, the lack of BPOM certification for "Whip Pink" makes its sale a violation of consumer protection laws. Bareskrim Polri has indicated that they are working closely with the Ministry of Health to evaluate whether tighter controls or a reclassification of N2O are necessary. The "billions of rupiah" in turnover also opens the door for investigations into money laundering (TPPU), as the syndicate sought to hide the proceeds of their illegal trade.

Economic Scale of the Illegal N2O Market

The illegal N2O market in Indonesia is part of a broader global trend. In countries like the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, the "silver bullet" canisters (small N2O chargers) became so prevalent that they were eventually banned or strictly regulated. In Indonesia, the "Whip Pink" model represents an evolution of this market, moving toward larger, more profitable canisters that offer a higher volume of gas per unit.

The economic incentive for the syndicate was immense. A single large canister can be sold for several hundred thousand rupiah, while the cost of bulk industrial N2O is relatively low. By marketing the product as a "lifestyle" brand, the perpetrators were able to command premium prices. The closure of this factory is expected to cause a significant supply shock in the illegal market, at least in the Greater Jakarta area.

Bareskrim Gerebek Pabrik Whip Pink Ilegal di Jakarta, Omzet Tembus Miliaran Rupiah

Future Preventative Measures and Public Safety Warnings

Following the successful raid, Bareskrim Polri has issued a stern warning to both distributors and consumers. Brigadier General Eko Hadi Santoso emphasized that the police will continue to monitor online marketplaces and social media platforms for any signs of "Whip Pink" or similar illicit products. There is also an ongoing effort to identify the source of the raw N2O gas, as the factory required a steady supply of industrial-grade tanks to function.

Public health advocates are calling for an educational campaign to inform the youth about the dangers of N2O. "The problem with ‘laughing gas’ is that its name makes it sound benign," said one health analyst. "But the neurological damage we are seeing in hospitals is very real and often irreversible."

The dismantling of the "Whip Pink" factory is a landmark case in Indonesia’s fight against emerging chemical threats. It demonstrates the agility of the Dittipidnarkoba Bareskrim Polri in tackling non-traditional drug trends that exploit regulatory gaps. As the investigation continues, the police are expected to track down the broader network of distributors, including those who facilitated the "undercover buy" that led to the raid. For now, the message from the authorities is clear: illegal chemical production facilities, regardless of their branding or celebrity associations, will be found and shut down to protect the Indonesian public.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Islamic and Religious Life

Mahkamah Agung Israel Sidangkan Pemberhentian Ben-Gvir, Netanyahu Bela Mati-matian

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

TEL AVIV – Israel’s Supreme Court on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, commenced a landmark hearing on petitions seeking the dismissal of National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir from his high-profile position. The proceedings, which have captivated national attention, center on allegations of the minister’s purported unlawful interference in the operational affairs of the Israel Police, a charge that strikes at the heart of the country’s democratic principles and the independence of its law enforcement agencies. The court’s decision to hear the petitions privately, though with a live broadcast to mitigate potential public unrest, underscores the extreme sensitivity and volatile nature of the case, which many observers believe could precipitate an unprecedented constitutional crisis.

The move by the Supreme Court to consider removing a sitting minister is exceedingly rare and reflects the profound legal and political tensions gripping Israel. Minister Ben-Gvir, a controversial figure from the far-right Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) party, has been under intense scrutiny since assuming his role in late 2022. His tenure has been marked by a series of provocative statements and actions that critics argue have systematically eroded the professional autonomy of the police force and undermined the rule of law.

The Genesis of the Controversy: Allegations of Ministerial Overreach

The core of the legal challenge against Ben-Gvir revolves around the fundamental principle of police independence. In democratic systems, law enforcement agencies are expected to operate free from direct political manipulation, ensuring impartial application of the law. Petitioners, including various civil society organizations and legal watchdog groups, contend that Ben-Gvir has repeatedly crossed this line, issuing direct operational directives to police officers, influencing appointments, and commenting on ongoing investigations.

Among the specific allegations cited in the petitions are claims that Ben-Gvir:

  • Directed police actions during protests: There have been reports and public statements where Ben-Gvir appeared to issue direct orders regarding the handling of demonstrations, particularly those involving Palestinian citizens or ultra-Orthodox communities, often advocating for a harsher response than police commanders deemed appropriate or lawful.
  • Attempted to influence personnel decisions: Critics allege he sought to appoint individuals loyal to his political agenda to key positions within the police force or to remove officers who resisted his directives.
  • Made public comments on ongoing investigations: Such remarks are seen as an attempt to exert undue pressure on law enforcement and judicial processes, potentially prejudicing outcomes.
  • Changed police rules of engagement: There were reports of Ben-Gvir pushing for more aggressive rules of engagement, particularly concerning interactions with Palestinian youth, which raised significant human rights concerns and warnings from legal experts.

These actions, the petitioners argue, constitute an abuse of power and a direct threat to the integrity of the police force, transforming it from a professional body serving the public into a political tool of the minister.

Ben-Gvir’s Defiance and the Mandate Argument

Outside the Supreme Court building, dozens of Ben-Gvir’s supporters rallied, holding banners denouncing what they termed "judicial dictatorship" and demanding an end to judicial overreach. The minister himself addressed the crowd, adopting a defiant stance. "Government Legal Adviser Gali Baharav-Miara claims that I changed policy and policing, and interfered in appointments to implement my policy. She is right," Ben-Gvir declared, doubling down on the very actions that form the basis of the legal challenge.

He asserted that his actions were a direct fulfillment of his electoral mandate. "More than half a million voters chose us to bring real change. The Supreme Court does not have the authority to dismiss me and there will be no coup." This statement directly challenges the court’s jurisdiction and power of judicial review, an essential component of Israel’s democratic checks and balances, especially in the absence of a formal constitution. Ben-Gvir further warned the Supreme Court, stating, "Do not drag Israel into a constitutional crisis, division, or polarization. Democracy will not collapse. The legal dictatorship will collapse." This rhetoric mirrors the broader narrative promoted by elements within the current governing coalition, which has consistently accused the judiciary of overstepping its bounds.

The Role of the Government Legal Adviser and the Supreme Court’s "Reasonableness Standard"

The Government Legal Adviser, Gali Baharav-Miara, plays a pivotal role in this unfolding drama. As the chief legal counsel to the government, her opinion carries significant weight and is generally considered binding on government ministers. Baharav-Miara has consistently advised against Ben-Gvir’s alleged interventions, asserting that they exceed his legal authority and infringe upon the operational independence of the police. Her official legal opinion, which likely forms a significant part of the petitioners’ case, is critical because it represents the government’s own legal watchdog flagging potential illegality within the executive branch.

The Supreme Court’s authority to intervene in such matters often relies on the "reasonableness standard" – a legal doctrine allowing the court to strike down administrative decisions by government officials or ministers if they are deemed "unreasonable in the extreme." This standard, while a cornerstone of Israeli administrative law, has become a flashpoint in the ongoing judicial overhaul debate. Critics of the judiciary, including Ben-Gvir and his allies, argue that the "reasonableness standard" grants the court excessive power to substitute its judgment for that of elected officials, thereby undermining democratic governance.

Broader Context: The Judicial Overhaul Debate

The current hearing is not an isolated event but rather a direct consequence of a deeply entrenched and highly polarized debate over the future of Israel’s judiciary. Since its formation in late 2022, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, which includes Ben-Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit party, has pursued a controversial agenda aimed at significantly curbing the powers of the Supreme Court. Proposals have included limiting the court’s ability to strike down laws, changing the composition of the judicial selection committee, and abolishing the "reasonableness standard."

These proposed reforms triggered unprecedented mass protests across Israel throughout 2023 and 2024, with hundreds of thousands demonstrating weekly against what they perceived as an assault on democracy and the rule of law. The current hearing involving Ben-Gvir is seen by many as a practical manifestation of this ideological struggle: the judiciary asserting its existing powers in the face of a government that seeks to diminish them, and a minister actively challenging the very premise of judicial oversight. The outcome of this case could therefore set a crucial precedent for the balance of power between Israel’s executive and judicial branches.

The UNRWA Controversy: A Precedent of Ben-Gvir’s Actions

Further illustrating the contentious nature of Minister Ben-Gvir’s approach to his role, an earlier incident from January 20, 2026, serves as a significant backdrop. On that date, Ben-Gvir was observed overseeing an Israeli bulldozer demolishing a portion of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) headquarters in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem.

This action was highly controversial for several reasons. UNRWA is a UN agency responsible for Palestinian refugees, and its facilities generally hold protected status under international law. The demolition, reportedly undertaken without full coordination or legal justification acceptable to the UN, sparked international condemnation and highlighted Israel’s often-strained relationship with international bodies, particularly concerning East Jerusalem and the Palestinian territories. For critics, Ben-Gvir’s presence and apparent approval of such an action underscored a pattern of behavior characterized by aggressive unilateralism and a disregard for established norms or international protocols. This incident, while distinct from the police interference allegations, contributes to the broader perception of Ben-Gvir as a minister willing to push boundaries and challenge existing frameworks, both domestically and internationally.

The Minister of Justice’s Intervention and the Specter of a Constitutional Crisis

Adding another layer of complexity and potential escalation, Minister of Justice Yariv Levin, a key architect of the judicial overhaul proposals and a prominent member of the ruling Likud party, publicly stated that any decision by the Supreme Court to dismiss Ben-Gvir would not be implemented. This declaration is highly inflammatory and represents a direct challenge to the authority and legitimacy of the judicial branch.

Should the Supreme Court rule to remove Ben-Gvir and the government, supported by Levin’s stance, refuse to comply, Israel would plunge into an unprecedented constitutional crisis. Such a scenario would entail:

  • A direct clash between branches of government: The executive (government) would be openly defying the judiciary (Supreme Court), severely undermining the principle of separation of powers.
  • Erosion of the rule of law: If court rulings can be selectively disregarded by the government, the very foundation of legal order and democratic governance is imperiled.
  • Impact on public trust: Such defiance would likely deepen societal divisions and further erode public trust in state institutions.
  • International repercussions: A constitutional crisis of this magnitude would draw significant international criticism, raising concerns about Israel’s democratic health and its adherence to fundamental democratic norms.
  • Uncertainty for police and civil servants: Law enforcement and civil service professionals would face an impossible dilemma: whom to obey – the minister who directs them or the court that rules on the minister’s legality.

Implications and Future Outlook

The Supreme Court hearing on Itamar Ben-Gvir’s dismissal is more than just a legal case; it is a profound test for Israel’s democratic institutions and its constitutional framework. The outcome will have far-reaching implications for:

  • Police independence: A ruling against Ben-Gvir, if enforced, could reaffirm the professional autonomy of the police. Conversely, a failure to dismiss him, or defiance of such a ruling, could further politicize law enforcement.
  • The power of judicial review: The case will clarify the limits of ministerial authority versus the judiciary’s role in upholding the rule of law and protecting democratic norms.
  • Government stability: A dismissal could destabilize the already fragile governing coalition, potentially leading to early elections. Conversely, a victory for Ben-Gvir could embolden the government in its judicial overhaul agenda.
  • Public discourse and polarization: The intense public and political reactions underscore the deep ideological rifts within Israeli society, which are likely to intensify regardless of the ruling.

As the Supreme Court deliberates, the nation watches with bated breath. The decision, expected in the coming weeks or months, will not only determine the political fate of Itamar Ben-Gvir but also cast a long shadow over the future of Israel’s democratic character and the enduring strength of its constitutional checks and balances. The stakes could not be higher for a nation already grappling with profound internal divisions and external challenges.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sports and Fitness

Basral Graito Hutomo Secures Historic Gold Medal for Indonesia at SEA Games 2025

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

Jakarta, Indonesia – The Indonesian sporting landscape is abuzz with excitement following the triumphant performance of Basral Graito Hutomo, who clinched a coveted gold medal for his nation at the 2025 Southeast Asian Games (SEA Games) in Bangkok, Thailand. The prodigious skateboarder, a rising star in the Indonesian national team, demonstrated remarkable consistency and unwavering confidence from the preliminary rounds all the way to the nail-biting final. His victory not only adds another prestigious accolade to Indonesia’s tally but also shines a spotlight on the burgeoning talent within the nation’s extreme sports scene.

Competing with a seemingly carefree yet strategically astute approach, Basral delivered a personal best performance, amassing an impressive score of 166.67 points. The decisive moment of his victory came during his final attempt, a breathtaking combination of a 360 flip seamlessly transitioning into a boardslide. This daring maneuver, executed under immense pressure, captivated the crowd and secured his well-deserved triumph. The journey to this pinnacle of regional athletic achievement is a testament to Basral’s dedication, resilience, and the strategic cultivation of his extraordinary talent.

The Rise of a Skateboarding Prodigy: Basral Graito Hutomo’s Profile

Basral Graito Hutomo, born on January 22, 2007, in Tangerang, Indonesia, has emerged as a formidable force in the skateboarding arena. Although his birthplace is Tangerang, his formative years were spent in Karanganyar, Central Java. It was in this region that his passion for extreme sports began to take root and his innate talent started to blossom. Widely recognized for his exceptional skills in the men’s street discipline, Basral has consistently pushed his boundaries, relentlessly honing his techniques and refining his skateboarding prowess.

His initial fascination with skateboarding ignited between 2017 and 2018, a period marked by his frequent visits to the Manahan Stadium. There, he would witness the exhilarating performances of BMX enthusiasts. These experiences served as a powerful catalyst, sparking his desire to try skateboarding and planting the seed of an ambition to become a professional athlete.

Basral’s early days on the board were characterized by resourcefulness. He began practicing with a second-hand skateboard, acquired from a friend for a modest sum of Rp5,000 (approximately $0.35 USD). Recognizing his son’s burgeoning seriousness and dedication, his father provided him with a more suitable skateboard, enabling him to train with greater efficacy. His practice sessions were a regular affair, spanning various locations from the comfort of his home’s yard to the dedicated skatepark facilities within the campus grounds of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS). This consistent dedication, even with rudimentary equipment, laid the foundation for his later success.

Navigating the Crossroads: Education vs. Skateboarding Ambitions

As Basral transitioned from the fifth to the sixth grade of elementary school, he found himself at a significant crossroads, facing a pivotal decision that would shape his future. He had to determine whether to prioritize his formal education or dedicate his full attention to the increasingly intensive training required for competitive skateboarding. This dilemma is a common challenge for young athletes aspiring to excel in demanding sports, where intense training schedules often conflict with the rigid structure of traditional schooling.

The year 2019 marked a crucial turning point when Basral was selected to participate in the National Training Camp (Pelatnas) in Bandung. This intensive nine-month program was designed as preparation for the Philippines SEA Games. However, his participation in the Pelatnas was met with obstacles concerning school permits. The situation escalated to the point where he faced the threat of not being promoted to the next grade if he proceeded with the training.

With unwavering support from his father, Basral ultimately made the courageous decision to pursue an alternative educational path. He opted for non-formal education through the "Paket C" equivalency program, a flexible curriculum designed for individuals who cannot attend regular schooling. This choice allowed him to dedicate his energy and focus wholeheartedly on developing his career in the competitive world of skateboarding, a decision that has demonstrably paid dividends.

A Historic Triumph: Gold at SEA Games 2025

The sacrifices made and the relentless hard work undertaken by Basral Graito Hutomo have culminated in a spectacular victory. Fueled by the unwavering support of his family, particularly his father, Basral proudly delivered a gold medal for Indonesia at the 2025 SEA Games, held at the Extreme Sports Park of the Rajamangala National Stadium in Bangkok. The SEA Games, a biennial multi-sport event involving athletes from ten Southeast Asian countries, is a prestigious platform for regional sporting excellence. For skateboarding, which made its debut at the 2018 Asian Games and has since gained prominence, the SEA Games provides a significant opportunity for athletes to showcase their skills on an international stage.

Throughout the competition, from the initial heats to the final showdown, Basral exhibited remarkable stability and an unshakeable sense of self-belief. The climax of his performance, and indeed the competition, occurred during the single trick session. Under immense pressure, he executed his routine with a palpable sense of freedom and confidence. His winning combination, a fluid 360 flip that elegantly flowed into a boardslide, was a masterful display of skill and daring, ultimately sealing his victory.

This extraordinary performance earned him a total score of 166.67 points, surpassing those of two Thai athletes who were competing on home turf. This remarkable achievement not only underscores Basral’s individual brilliance but also firmly establishes him as one of the premier skateboarders in the Southeast Asian region.

Context of the SEA Games 2025 Skateboarding Competition

The SEA Games 2025 skateboarding competition in Bangkok was particularly fierce, with host nation Thailand aiming to leverage home-field advantage. The men’s street event, where Basral excelled, is known for its dynamic and technically demanding nature, requiring athletes to navigate a series of obstacles like stairs, rails, and ledges with a combination of freestyle tricks and controlled landings. Scores are awarded based on difficulty, execution, creativity, and consistency.

Indonesia, as a nation, has been investing in the development of its skateboarding talent, recognizing its potential for international success. The Indonesian Skateboarding and Rollerblading Association (PERSEROSI) has been instrumental in identifying and nurturing young athletes like Basral, providing them with the necessary training and support systems. The success at the SEA Games is a direct reflection of these strategic efforts.

The SEA Games serves as a crucial stepping stone for athletes aiming for higher-level competitions, including the Asian Games and eventually the Olympic Games. For many, it is their first taste of a major multi-sport event, demanding not only peak physical performance but also strong mental fortitude. Basral’s ability to perform under such pressure is a testament to his maturity and readiness for the elite level of competition.

Supporting Data and Performance Metrics

Basral’s winning score of 166.67 points in the men’s street event at the SEA Games 2025 highlights his superior technical ability and execution. While specific details of his trick scores are not always publicly disclosed in immediate reports, a score of this magnitude typically signifies a flawless or near-flawless execution of multiple high-difficulty tricks. In skateboarding competitions, judges evaluate runs based on several criteria:

  • Difficulty: The inherent challenge of the tricks performed.
  • Execution: The precision and fluidity with which tricks are landed.
  • Creativity: The originality and style exhibited by the skater.
  • Consistency: The ability to land tricks repeatedly and smoothly throughout a run.
  • Use of Obstacles: How effectively the skater utilizes the provided course elements.

Basral’s final trick, the 360 flip into a boardslide, is a complex maneuver that combines aerial rotation with grinding on a rail. Successfully landing such a trick, especially as a final, decisive move, requires exceptional control and nerve. His ability to achieve the highest score indicates that his entire run, not just the final trick, was of exceptional quality.

In comparison, typical winning scores in major skateboarding competitions can vary, but a score above 160 in a street event is generally considered outstanding. This score places Basral in an elite category within the region, demonstrating a significant gap between his performance and that of his closest competitors.

Reactions and Implications

The victory has undoubtedly sparked immense pride within Indonesia. While direct quotes from the Indonesian Minister of Youth and Sports or the President of PERSEROSI are not included in the provided text, it is reasonable to infer enthusiastic congratulations and commendations would be forthcoming. Such a win serves as a significant morale booster for the national sports contingent and inspires younger generations to pursue their athletic dreams.

The performance of Basral Graito Hutomo at the SEA Games 2025 has several key implications for Indonesian skateboarding and sports development:

  • Increased Popularity and Investment: This gold medal is likely to significantly boost the popularity of skateboarding in Indonesia. Increased public interest often translates into greater investment from both government bodies and private sponsors, leading to improved training facilities, more competitive opportunities, and better support for athletes.
  • Talent Identification and Development: Basral’s success validates the current talent identification and development programs within Indonesia. It encourages further investment in these programs to unearth and nurture more athletes with similar potential.
  • International Recognition: The win places Indonesian skateboarding firmly on the regional map, showcasing the nation’s capability to produce world-class talent. This recognition can open doors for Indonesian athletes to participate in more international events and gain valuable experience.
  • Inspiration for Youth: For young Indonesians who are passionate about skateboarding, Basral’s journey from humble beginnings to a SEA Games champion provides a powerful source of inspiration. It demonstrates that with dedication and support, ambitious goals are achievable.

The article also references previous reports concerning Basral, including an explanation from the Malaysian skateboard coach regarding Basral’s victory celebration and a piece on his strategy of learning from falls. This suggests a consistent media interest in Basral’s career and his approach to the sport, indicating he is a notable figure within the skateboarding community. The mention of learning from falls is particularly insightful, highlighting a mature and resilient mindset crucial for success in a sport that inherently involves risk and setbacks.

The Road Ahead

Basral Graito Hutomo’s journey is far from over. His SEA Games triumph is a significant milestone, but it is likely a stepping stone towards greater achievements. As he continues to mature and hone his skills, the international skateboarding scene will be watching closely. The focus will now shift towards how he can translate this regional success into global competitiveness, potentially aiming for podium finishes at the Asian Games, World Championships, and ultimately, the Olympic Games, where skateboarding made its debut at the Tokyo 2020 (held in 2021) edition. His dedication, coupled with continued support and strategic development, positions him as a promising ambassador for Indonesian sports on the world stage.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Technology and Gadgets

Online Motorcycle Taxi Drivers Protest at SMRC Office Following Controversial Statement by Founder Saiful Mujani

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

JAKARTA – The office of Saiful Mujani Research and Consulting (SMRC) in Gondangdia, Central Jakarta, became the focal point of a significant public demonstration on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, when a large contingent of online motorcycle taxi (ojol) drivers gathered to voice their strong disapproval. The protest was a direct consequence of a statement made by SMRC founder Saiful Mujani, which was widely interpreted as alluding to efforts to destabilize or even overthrow the government of President Prabowo Subianto. The incident has since ignited a broader debate on freedom of expression, political stability, and the role of public opinion research institutions in Indonesia’s democratic landscape.

The initial protest on April 14 saw hundreds of ojol drivers converge on the SMRC premises, chanting slogans and displaying banners that demanded accountability from Saiful Mujani. Eyewitnesses and media reports from the scene depicted a charged atmosphere, with protestors explicitly calling for Mujani’s arrest and legal prosecution, accusing him of sedition or incitement against the legitimate government. The gravity of their demands underscored the depth of public anger and the perceived seriousness of Mujani’s comments.

The day following the protest, on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, Saiful Mujani himself took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to address the unfolding situation. In a series of posts, he confirmed the April 14 demonstration by the ojol community and revealed that further protests were anticipated. "People calling themselves the association of ojol and today a group of students are said to be storming my office," Mujani wrote on his official account, @saiful_mujani. He also granted SindoNews permission to quote his statements, further highlighting the public nature of the escalating conflict. Mujani’s posts concluded with a poignant reflection on the evolving political climate: "The arena of conflict is expanding from ‘rakyat vs istana’ (people vs. palace) to ‘rakyat vs rakyat’ (people vs. people) as well. The cost of a stance." This observation by Mujani suggested a deepening polarization within Indonesian society, where political disagreements were no longer confined to traditional power structures but were manifesting as direct confrontations among different segments of the populace.

Chronology of Escalation

The events leading to the protest and its aftermath unfolded rapidly, showcasing the swift mobilization capabilities of various groups in Indonesia, particularly through digital platforms.

  • Pre-April 14, 2026: Saiful Mujani reportedly makes a statement, the exact wording of which was not provided in the initial reports but was widely interpreted as critical of the newly inaugurated administration or as suggesting methods of opposition that some deemed subversive. While the specific context remains partially obscured, such statements, especially from influential public figures, often gain traction quickly through social media and word-of-mouth.
  • Tuesday, April 14, 2026: Hundreds of online motorcycle taxi drivers, identifying themselves as members of various ojol associations or simply as concerned citizens, gather outside the SMRC office in Gondangdia, Central Jakarta. The protest is vociferous, with participants demanding the arrest and trial of Saiful Mujani for his alleged comments. The presence of such a large and visible group draws significant media attention, elevating the issue to national discourse.
  • Wednesday, April 15, 2026 (Morning): Saiful Mujani posts on his X account, acknowledging the previous day’s protest and indicating that his office is bracing for further demonstrations, this time involving both ojol groups and student collectives. His tweet underscores the expanding scope of the protests and his perception of the shifting dynamics of political conflict in Indonesia.

Background: Saiful Mujani and SMRC’s Role in Indonesian Politics

Saiful Mujani is a highly prominent figure in Indonesian academia and public opinion research. As a political scientist and the founder of SMRC, he has played a significant role in shaping political discourse and providing data-driven insights into voter behavior and public sentiment. SMRC itself is recognized as one of Indonesia’s leading independent survey institutions, renowned for its pre-election polls, public policy research, and socio-political analysis.

Established with a commitment to scientific rigor and objectivity, SMRC has historically provided crucial data that has informed election campaigns, policy decisions, and public understanding of political trends. Its surveys are often cited by media, politicians, and academics, making its pronouncements influential. The institution’s independence has generally been a hallmark of its operations, striving to provide unbiased data even when findings might be uncomfortable for various political factions. This established credibility makes any controversy involving its founder particularly noteworthy, as it can raise questions about academic freedom, the neutrality of research, and the potential for political pressure on independent institutions.

In a political landscape where public trust in institutions can be fragile, the role of survey organizations like SMRC is dual-edged. While they provide essential metrics for democratic processes, their interpretations and public statements can also become lightning rods for political contention, especially during sensitive periods such as the early stages of a new presidential administration.

The Substance of the Alleged Statement and Its Sensitivity

While the exact statement made by Saiful Mujani that triggered the protests was not detailed in the original report, its characterization as "alluding to efforts to overthrow President Prabowo Subianto" points to its highly sensitive nature. In Indonesia, any rhetoric perceived as undermining the constitutional order or inciting rebellion against a legitimately elected government carries significant legal and political weight. The concept of makar (treason or subversion) is a serious charge under Indonesian law, often invoked in cases where individuals or groups are seen as threatening national stability or the integrity of the state.

During the initial phase of a new presidential term, such as that of President Prabowo Subianto, the political atmosphere is often particularly charged. Administrations typically seek to consolidate power, build public confidence, and demonstrate stability. Any public commentary, especially from influential figures, that suggests or supports destabilizing actions can be met with strong reactions from government supporters and security apparatuses. The perception of such statements can be amplified through social media, leading to rapid mobilization of counter-movements, as evidenced by the ojol protest.

Kantor SMRC Didemo, Saiful Mujani: Ongkos Sebuah Sikap

The incident highlights a recurring tension in Indonesian democracy: the balance between guaranteed freedom of speech and the state’s prerogative to maintain order and prevent incitement. Public intellectuals and researchers often navigate this delicate line, providing critical analysis that can be interpreted differently by various political actors.

The Online Motorcycle Taxi (Ojol) Community as a Political Force

The mobilization of online motorcycle taxi drivers in the protest against SMRC is a significant aspect of this event. The ojol community in Indonesia represents a massive demographic, numbering in the millions across major cities. These drivers are not merely a workforce; they are a highly connected, often organized, and politically aware segment of society. Their collective power has been demonstrated in various contexts, from advocating for better working conditions and fairer regulations to participating in broader social and political movements.

Factors contributing to their political significance include:

  • Large Numbers: Their sheer multitude provides substantial physical presence in protests.
  • Ease of Mobilization: Digital platforms and established networks among drivers facilitate rapid communication and assembly.
  • Socio-economic Vulnerability: Many drivers operate on thin margins, making them susceptible to economic and political pressures, and sometimes to organized influence.
  • Direct Public Interface: As they interact with a vast cross-section of society daily, their opinions and actions can resonate widely.

The involvement of ojol drivers in this specific protest raises questions about the authenticity of grassroots anger versus potential orchestration. While genuine anger over perceived insults to the presidency could certainly motivate some drivers, the organized nature of such large-scale protests often suggests a degree of coordination or encouragement from specific political factions or interest groups. This dynamic reflects the broader pattern in Indonesian politics where various social groups, including labor unions, student organizations, and religious groups, can be mobilized for political ends.

Broader Implications for Indonesian Democracy and Free Speech

Saiful Mujani’s remark about the conflict expanding from "rakyat vs istana" to "rakyat vs rakyat" encapsulates a crucial concern for Indonesia’s democratic health. Such intra-societal conflicts, particularly when fueled by political rhetoric and facilitated by social media, can lead to deeper societal divisions, erosion of trust, and potential instability.

The incident carries several broader implications:

  • Freedom of Academic and Political Expression: The protest against SMRC raises alarms among proponents of academic freedom and freedom of speech. If researchers and public intellectuals face physical intimidation and calls for arrest over their interpretations or analyses, it could create a chilling effect, discouraging critical discourse and independent thought. This could ultimately undermine the quality of public debate and policy formation.
  • Role of Independent Institutions: The integrity and independence of survey institutions like SMRC are vital for a functioning democracy. They provide objective data that can hold power accountable and inform citizens. Protests aimed at silencing such institutions can be seen as an attempt to control the narrative and suppress dissenting views, thereby weakening democratic checks and balances.
  • Political Mobilization and Social Cohesion: The use of large social groups like ojol drivers for political protests, especially those targeting individuals or institutions for their opinions, highlights the potential for instrumentalizing segments of the population. This can strain social cohesion, particularly if different groups are pitted against each other based on political loyalties.
  • Consolidation of Power: In the context of a new administration, such protests can be interpreted in multiple ways. On one hand, they could represent genuine popular support for the president and a rejection of perceived threats. On the other, they could be seen as a tactic to consolidate power by signaling that critical voices will not be tolerated, thereby limiting the space for opposition and dissent.
  • Impact on Public Discourse: The controversy is likely to intensify debates within Indonesia about what constitutes acceptable political commentary, where the line between legitimate criticism and incitement lies, and how social media platforms contribute to the rapid spread and polarization of these discussions.

Inferred Reactions and Responses

While specific official statements beyond Saiful Mujani’s tweet were not provided, a situation of this magnitude would invariably elicit reactions from various stakeholders:

  • From SMRC and Saiful Mujani (Beyond the Tweet): It is highly probable that SMRC, as an institution, would issue a formal statement defending its integrity, the scientific basis of its research, and the right to academic freedom. Saiful Mujani himself might clarify his original statement, perhaps arguing that it was taken out of context or misinterpreted, and reasserting his commitment to democratic principles and national unity, while denying any intent to incite rebellion.
  • From the Government/Presidential Palace: The administration would likely issue a call for calm, emphasizing the importance of national unity and adherence to legal processes. While implicitly supporting the public’s right to express their views, they would also likely caution against actions that could lead to public disorder or be interpreted as undermining state authority. There might be subtle messaging to deter further escalation while avoiding direct confrontation with protestors.
  • From Civil Society Organizations and Academia: Human rights groups, academic associations, and other civil society organizations would likely voice concerns about the potential for intimidation against researchers and the erosion of freedom of expression. They would advocate for a robust democratic space where critical analysis is tolerated and protected.
  • From Pro-Government Groups: Supporters of President Prabowo Subianto would likely justify the ojol protest as a legitimate expression of public support for the president and a defense against perceived attempts to destabilize the government. They might reiterate calls for respect for the newly elected leadership.
  • From Opposition Figures/Critics: Political figures and commentators critical of the government might express concern over the use of street protests to silence dissent, viewing it as a worrying trend that could stifle democratic debate.

Conclusion: The Enduring "Cost of a Stance"

The protest at the SMRC office on April 14, 2026, and its subsequent developments, encapsulate a complex moment in Indonesian political life. It underscores the continued sensitivity surrounding political discourse, particularly when it touches upon the stability of the government or the legitimacy of its leadership. Saiful Mujani’s observation that the "arena of conflict is expanding from ‘rakyat vs istana’ to ‘rakyat vs rakyat’" serves as a stark reminder of the potential for deep societal divisions when political tensions are high.

This incident will likely be remembered as a critical test for Indonesia’s democratic maturity, challenging its commitment to freedom of expression while navigating the imperatives of national stability. The "cost of a stance," as Mujani articulated, extends far beyond the individual, impacting the health of public discourse, the independence of research institutions, and the very fabric of social cohesion in one of the world’s largest democracies. The resolution of this situation, and the public and official responses to it, will offer significant insights into the future trajectory of political freedoms and civic engagement in Indonesia.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
National News

Anti-Corruption Commission Seizes Electronic Evidence in Customs Bribery Probe, Faces Defamation and Ethics Complaints from Witness

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has revealed the seizure of crucial electronic evidence from Faizal Assegaf, the President Director of PT Sinkos Multimedia Mandiri, which is believed to be directly linked to an ongoing corruption investigation within the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. This development has ignited a legal and ethical dispute, as Assegaf has subsequently filed reports against KPK spokesperson Budi Prasetyo for alleged defamation and ethical violations.

The seized items, detailed by the KPK, include an Apple Mac computer complete with its Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse, a Lumix S5IIX mirrorless camera with spare batteries, a monitor, and a Boss WL-30XLR Wireless System microphone. These devices, high-end electronic equipment often used for communication, data storage, and media production, are now in the custody of KPK investigators, undergoing forensic analysis to uncover any connections to the alleged illicit activities within the customs apparatus. Budi Prasetyo, speaking from the KPK headquarters in Jakarta on Wednesday evening, April 15, 2026, confirmed the nature of the seized items, stating, "The items confiscated by investigators are electronic goods such as monitors, cameras, and several other electronic devices." He further clarified that the total monetary value of these seized items had not yet been assessed by the investigative team. "No, we have not received that information yet," Budi stated when asked about the estimated value of the evidence.

Escalating Legal Battle: Defamation and Ethics Complaints

The seizure and the subsequent public statement by Budi Prasetyo have triggered a swift and assertive response from Faizal Assegaf, who has initiated counter-legal actions. Assegaf filed a report against Budi Prasetyo with the Polda Metro Jaya, accusing the KPK spokesperson of defamation. The report is officially registered under the number: LP/B/2592/IV/2026/SPKT/POLDA METRO JAYA. Concurrently, on the same day, Assegaf escalated his complaints by reporting Budi Prasetyo to the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas KPK) for alleged breaches of the anti-graft body’s code of ethics. These actions underscore the increasingly contentious nature of high-profile corruption investigations in Indonesia, where individuals implicated, even as witnesses, are utilizing legal avenues to challenge the actions and statements of anti-corruption officials.

The basis for Assegaf’s complaints appears to stem from the public disclosure of his identity and the specifics of the seized electronic items by the KPK spokesperson, which Assegaf may perceive as prejudicial to his reputation or an overreach of the KPK’s public communication policy. Defamation laws in Indonesia, particularly Article 310 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), criminalize statements that attack a person’s honor or good name. While public officials often have a higher threshold for proving defamation, such reports can lead to lengthy legal processes and divert resources. The complaint to Dewas KPK, an independent body established to oversee the ethical conduct of KPK personnel, suggests a challenge to the procedural integrity and professional conduct of the spokesperson during the investigation.

The Underlying Corruption Scandal at Customs and Excise

Faizal Assegaf’s involvement in this investigation began when he was summoned as a witness on April 7, 2026, to provide testimony regarding the alleged corruption at the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. Alongside him, two Customs officials, Muhammad Mahzun and Rahmat, were also called in for questioning. Their testimonies are crucial for strengthening the case files against seven individuals who have already been named suspects in a complex web of alleged bribery related to goods importations and gratification.

The seven suspects, all of whom are currently detained at the KPK’s detention facility, represent a mix of high-ranking Customs officials and private sector individuals. They include:

  1. Rizal: Former Director of Investigation & Enforcement at the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, serving from 2024 to January 2026. His position suggests potential involvement in overseeing or manipulating enforcement actions related to imports.
  2. Sisprian Subiaksono: Head of the Sub-directorate of Intelligence for Enforcement and Investigation (Kasubdit Intel P2 DJBC). Individuals in this role are responsible for gathering intelligence on customs violations, making their alleged involvement particularly concerning for the integrity of enforcement.
  3. Orlando: Head of the Intelligence Section at the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (Kasi Intel DJBC). Similar to Subiaksono, his position would grant him access to sensitive information and influence over investigative priorities.
  4. Andri: Team Leader of Import Documentation at PT Blueray. His role would involve managing the paperwork for imports, a critical juncture where bribery can occur to facilitate illicit goods or reduce duties.
  5. Budiman Bayu Prasojo: An employee of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. His specific role is not detailed, but his inclusion indicates a broader network of complicity within the institution.
  6. John Field: Owner of PT Blueray. As the principal of a company involved in imports, his alleged role would be central to initiating or facilitating the bribery schemes.
  7. Dedy Kurniawan: Operational Manager of PT Blueray. Like Andri, his operational role would place him at the heart of the import process, where illicit transactions could be executed.

The KPK has indicated that for the suspects associated with PT Blueray (John Field, Andri, and Dedy Kurniawan), their case files have already been handed over to the Public Prosecutor (JPU), signaling that the investigation phase is nearing completion for these individuals and trials are expected to commence soon. This progression highlights the gravity of the allegations and the KPK’s commitment to bringing these cases to court.

Daftar Barbuk Kasus Bea Cukai yang Disita KPK dari Faizal Assegaf

Chronology of Events

  • April 7, 2026: Faizal Assegaf, President Director of PT Sinkos Multimedia Mandiri, along with Customs officials Muhammad Mahzun and Rahmat, are summoned by the KPK to provide testimony as witnesses in the ongoing corruption investigation at the Directorate General of Customs and Excise.
  • April 15, 2026 (Wednesday evening): KPK spokesperson Budi Prasetyo publicly confirms the seizure of electronic evidence from Faizal Assegaf, linking it to the Customs corruption case. The seized items include an Apple Mac computer, a Lumix S5IIX camera, a monitor, and a Boss wireless microphone system.
  • Post-April 15, 2026: Faizal Assegaf files a formal report against Budi Prasetyo with the Polda Metro Jaya, alleging defamation. The report is registered under LP/B/2592/IV/2026/SPKT/POLDA METRO JAYA.
  • Same Day as Polda Report: Faizal Assegaf also reports Budi Prasetyo to the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas KPK) for alleged violations of the KPK’s code of ethics, likely related to the public disclosure of information regarding the seizure.
  • Ongoing: The seven primary suspects in the Customs corruption case remain in detention at the KPK Rutan. The case files for suspects linked to PT Blueray have been transferred to the Public Prosecutor, indicating impending trials.

Broader Context: Corruption in Customs and Anti-Graft Efforts

Corruption within customs agencies is a perennial challenge globally, and Indonesia is no exception. The Directorate General of Customs and Excise, responsible for collecting import duties, controlling goods movement, and combating smuggling, operates at a critical nexus of trade and national revenue. Its functions inherently involve high-value transactions, complex regulations, and discretionary powers, making it susceptible to bribery, illicit facilitation, and various forms of malfeasance. Such corruption can severely undermine state revenue, distort fair trade practices, and facilitate the entry of illegal or harmful goods.

The KPK’s sustained focus on customs corruption reflects a broader national commitment to enhancing transparency and accountability in public service. Over the years, the KPK has handled numerous high-profile cases involving customs officials, ranging from individual officers to high-ranking directorate members, underscoring the systemic nature of the problem. These investigations often involve intricate networks connecting public officials with private sector entities seeking to exploit loopholes or bypass regulations for financial gain.

The establishment of the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas KPK) in 2019 was intended to strengthen internal oversight and ensure the ethical conduct of KPK personnel, providing an avenue for citizens and officials alike to report alleged ethical breaches. While Dewas aims to maintain the integrity of the anti-corruption body, its existence also introduces a new layer of scrutiny that can sometimes be leveraged by individuals under investigation to challenge the process.

Implications and Future Outlook

The current developments present several key implications. For the KPK, the dual reports from Faizal Assegaf pose a challenge on multiple fronts. The defamation report to the police requires the agency to defend its spokesperson’s actions in a separate legal forum, potentially diverting resources and attention from the core corruption investigation. Simultaneously, the ethics complaint to Dewas KPK demands an internal review of the spokesperson’s conduct, which, if found to be in violation, could impact the agency’s public image and the morale of its officers. The KPK must navigate these challenges while steadfastly pursuing its anti-corruption mandate, demonstrating adherence to both legal procedures and ethical standards.

For Faizal Assegaf, the decision to file these reports signifies a determined legal defense strategy. By challenging the KPK’s actions and statements, he aims to assert his rights, potentially question the legitimacy of the evidence collection, and perhaps cast doubt on the overall investigative process. His actions highlight the right of individuals to seek legal recourse against perceived injustices, even when facing powerful state institutions. The outcome of these complaints will be closely watched, as they could set precedents for how KPK spokespersons communicate about ongoing investigations and how individuals under scrutiny interact with the anti-graft body.

More broadly, this case underscores the persistent and complex struggle against corruption in Indonesia. It demonstrates the critical role of electronic evidence in modern investigations, the interconnectedness of public and private sector corruption, and the increasing sophistication of legal challenges faced by anti-corruption agencies. The ultimate resolution of both the bribery and gratification case within the Directorate General of Customs and Excise and the subsequent complaints against the KPK spokesperson will be vital for reinforcing public trust in legal institutions and the nation’s commitment to good governance. The legal proceedings are expected to be lengthy and intricate, unfolding in the public eye as Indonesia continues its long-term battle against corruption.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Politics and Governance

Taj Yasin Maimoen Leads Popularity Rankings in Central Java Gubernatorial Race According to Parameter Politik Indonesia Survey

by Pevita Pearce
written by Pevita Pearce

The political landscape in Central Java is beginning to take shape as the 2024 regional head elections approach, with a recent survey by Parameter Politik Indonesia revealing that Taj Yasin Maimoen, the former Vice Governor of Central Java for the 2018-2023 period, currently stands as the most recognized figure among potential gubernatorial candidates. The survey, conducted between May 15 and May 21, 2024, indicates a shifting dynamic in one of Indonesia’s most strategically important provinces, often referred to as a barometer for national political trends. According to Adi Prayitno, the Executive Director of Parameter Politik Indonesia, Taj Yasin’s popularity is rooted in his previous tenure and his deep connections to the province’s influential religious and social networks.

During a virtual press briefing held in Jakarta on Wednesday, May 29, 2024, Adi Prayitno detailed the methodology used to gauge the public’s awareness of various political figures. The survey utilized a direct questioning approach, where respondents were asked individually whether they recognized specific names from a curated list of potential candidates. The results showed that Taj Yasin Maimoen secured a popularity rating of 52.1 percent, placing him at the top of the list. Following him is Hendrar Prihadi, the current Head of the National Public Procurement Agency (LKPP) and former Mayor of Semarang, who garnered 40 percent. In third place is the young Regent of Kendal, Dico Ganinduto, with 38.1 percent.

Survey Methodology and the Landscape of Popularity

The data collection process involved a rigorous sampling method designed to represent the diverse demographic of Central Java, which consists of 35 regencies and cities. By asking respondents one by one about their familiarity with these figures, the survey aimed to capture "top-of-mind" awareness and general recognition rather than just voting preference. Adi Prayitno emphasized that while these figures are currently the most talked about, their popularity levels have not yet reached a "striking" or dominant threshold that would guarantee an easy victory.

In the context of Indonesian regional elections (Pilkada), popularity is often the first hurdle for any candidate. It serves as a foundation for building electability—the actual likelihood of a person being voted into office. However, a popularity rating hovering around 50 percent for the frontrunner suggests that the race remains wide open. The survey identifies these individuals as figures with significant potential who are frequently linked to the gubernatorial race in public discourse, yet it also highlights a vacuum of absolute dominance that new challengers or intensive campaigning could still fill.

Profiles of the Leading Contenders

Taj Yasin Maimoen, popularly known as Gus Yasin, brings a unique blend of political experience and traditional religious authority. As the son of the late charismatic cleric Maimun Zubair, he commands significant respect among the Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) base, which is a massive voting bloc in Central Java. His five-year term as Vice Governor alongside Ganjar Pranowo provided him with a platform to travel across the province, solidifying his image as a leader who bridges the gap between the nationalist and religious factions of the electorate. His 52.1 percent popularity reflects this established presence.

Hendrar Prihadi, occupying the second spot, represents the technocratic and urban leadership style. Often referred to as Hendi, his tenure as the Mayor of Semarang was marked by significant infrastructure development and the modernization of the provincial capital. His transition to a national role as the head of LKPP has kept him in the public eye, though his current base remains strongest in the northern coastal regions of Central Java. His 40 percent recognition rate suggests that while he is a household name in urban centers, there is still room to grow his influence in the more rural southern and western parts of the province.

Dico Ganinduto, the Regent of Kendal, represents the "youth" factor in the upcoming election. At 38.1 percent, his popularity is notable given his relatively shorter time in the regional political spotlight compared to Taj Yasin or Hendrar Prihadi. Dico has utilized social media and modern branding effectively to raise his profile beyond the borders of Kendal. As a member of the Golkar Party, his positioning is seen as an attempt to capture the millennial and Gen Z vote, which will constitute a significant portion of the electorate in 2024.

Historical Context and the Shadow of the 2024 Presidential Election

To understand the significance of these numbers, one must look at the historical political leanings of Central Java. The province has long been known as the "Kandang Banteng" or the stronghold of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P). In the 2018 gubernatorial election, the pair of Ganjar Pranowo and Taj Yasin Maimoen won decisively, proving that a nationalist-religious coalition is a winning formula in the region.

However, the 2024 Presidential Election results have introduced new variables. While PDI-P remains strong, the surge of the Prabowo-Gibran coalition in the presidential race has emboldened other parties, such as Gerindra and Golkar, to challenge the status quo in the regional elections. The popularity of figures like Dico Ganinduto (Golkar) and the potential emergence of other candidates like Sudaryono (Gerindra) indicate that the "Red Cage" may face a more fragmented and competitive environment than in previous cycles.

Emerging Challengers and Potential Coalitions

Beyond the top three, other names are circulating in the political grapevine. Ahmad Luthfi, the current Central Java Regional Police Chief, has seen his name rise in various discussions due to his long-standing service in the province and his perceived closeness to President Joko Widodo’s circle. Although not explicitly detailed in the top three of this specific Parameter Politik survey, figures like Luthfi represent the "bureaucratic-security" track of leadership that often appeals to voters seeking stability.

The formation of coalitions will be the next critical phase. In Indonesia, a candidate must be nominated by a political party or a coalition of parties that holds at least 20 percent of the seats in the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD). With PDI-P holding a significant number of seats, they have the luxury of nominating a candidate without a coalition, but history suggests they prefer partnerships to broaden their appeal. The question remains whether Taj Yasin will run as a governor or return as a vice-gubernatorial candidate, and which party will ultimately provide the vehicle for Hendrar Prihadi or Dico Ganinduto.

Analysis of Implications: Why No One is "Mentereng" Yet

Adi Prayitno’s observation that no candidate is yet "mentereng" (striking or exceptionally dominant) is a crucial takeaway for political analysts. In a province with over 28 million eligible voters, a popularity rating of 52 percent for the leader means that nearly half of the population is still either unaware of the top candidate or uncommitted. This lack of a clear "super-candidate" suggests several things:

  1. Fragmented Loyalty: The electorate is not currently coalescing around a single vision or personality, possibly due to the exhaustion following the intense 2024 Presidential Election.
  2. Wait-and-See Approach: Many voters are likely waiting for official party endorsements before forming an opinion. In Indonesia, the "party machine" plays a massive role in socializing candidates to the grassroots level.
  3. Opportunity for Newcomers: The relatively low ceiling of the current leaders provides a window of opportunity for "dark horse" candidates to enter the race and gain traction through aggressive campaigning over the next few months.

Chronology and Key Dates Ahead

The road to the Central Java Gubernatorial Election follows a strict timeline set by the General Elections Commission (KPU):

  • May – July 2024: Political parties engage in internal deliberations and conduct their own private surveys to determine viable candidates. This is the period of "political dowries" and coalition building.
  • August 27-29, 2024: The official registration period for candidates at the KPU. This will be the moment of truth when the final pairings are announced to the public.
  • September 22, 2024: The official announcement and determination of candidate pairs.
  • September 25 – November 23, 2024: The campaign period. This is where popularity numbers are expected to shift dramatically as candidates traverse the province’s 35 regencies.
  • November 27, 2024: Polling day. Residents of Central Java will head to the booths to elect their next leader.

The Broader Impact on National Politics

The outcome of the Central Java election is not just a local matter. As the third-most populous province in Indonesia, the Governor of Central Java automatically becomes a national figure with significant influence over the 2029 political cycle. The success or failure of the PDI-P in defending its "stronghold" will be seen as a litmus test for the party’s enduring strength in the post-Jokowi era. Similarly, if a candidate backed by the central government’s "KIM" (Koalisi Indonesia Maju) coalition wins, it would signal a consolidation of power by the incoming national administration.

As the months progress, the popularity figures cited by Parameter Politik Indonesia will serve as a baseline. The challenge for Taj Yasin Maimoen will be to convert his high recognition into a solid voting base, while Hendrar Prihadi and Dico Ganinduto must find ways to break through their current ceilings. With the political machinery just beginning to hum, Central Java is set for one of the most closely watched regional contests in recent history.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail