Tag:

challenges

Parliamentary Scrutiny Intensifies as DPR Commission IX Challenges National Nutrition Agency’s Unqualified Audit Opinion Amidst Low Budget Realization

by Basiran July 17, 2026

written by Basiran

Jakarta, Indonesia – A heated session at the House of Representatives saw members of Commission IX intensely question the leadership of the National Nutrition Agency (BGN) regarding its 2025 financial report, which had received an Unqualified Opinion (WTP) from the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). The skepticism arose from a significant disparity between the glowing audit report and the BGN’s notably low budget realization, prompting accusations that the WTP might be "fabricated." The contentious hearing took place on Friday, July 17, 2026, at the Nusantara I Building within the expansive Parliament Complex in Senayan, Jakarta, underscoring the legislative body’s commitment to robust oversight of government agencies responsible for critical public services.

Understanding the Unqualified Opinion (WTP) and its Context

An Unqualified Opinion (WTP), or Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian, is the highest form of audit opinion issued by the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) in Indonesia. It signifies that an entity’s financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with applicable financial reporting frameworks. For government agencies, receiving a WTP is generally considered a mark of strong financial governance, transparency, and accountability. It indicates that financial transactions are recorded accurately, internal controls are effective, and there are no material misstatements in the financial records. This opinion is highly coveted by government bodies as it reflects positively on their management and operational integrity.

However, the context in which BGN’s WTP was presented immediately raised red flags for members of Commission IX. The National Nutrition Agency (BGN) itself is a crucial institution established to address and mitigate pressing nutritional challenges across the Indonesian archipelago. Its mandate typically includes developing and implementing policies to combat malnutrition, stunting, and food insecurity, as well as promoting healthy dietary practices. In a nation where issues like childhood stunting remain a significant public health concern—affecting a substantial percentage of children under five, despite concerted national efforts—the effective and efficient functioning of BGN is paramount. The agency’s programs often involve complex logistical undertakings, from distributing nutritional supplements to educating communities on balanced diets, making its budget utilization a direct indicator of its impact on public welfare. Commission IX, with its oversight responsibilities encompassing health, manpower, and transmigration, is naturally vested in ensuring that BGN not only adheres to financial best practices but also effectively delivers on its vital mission.

Chronology of the Discrepancy and Parliamentary Scrutiny

The parliamentary hearing on July 17, 2026, was convened as a routine Rapat Dengar Pendapat (RDP), or Hearing, where government agencies present their annual reports and strategic plans to relevant parliamentary commissions. BGN’s leadership, including its Director-General and other senior officials, were present to articulate their achievements and operational challenges. A key component of their presentation was the announcement that BGN had successfully secured an Unqualified Opinion (WTP) from the BPK for its 2025 financial statements. This announcement, typically met with commendation, instead sparked immediate and sharp questioning from the legislative body.

Muazzim Akbar, a vocal member of Commission IX representing the National Mandate Party (PAN) faction, was among the first to express profound skepticism. He pointed out a glaring inconsistency: while BGN proudly displayed its WTP, its actual budget realization for the same period stood at a mere 59%. "Realisasi anggaran rata rata hanya 59%, gimana WTP tapi realisasi anggaran hanya sekian. Jangan jangan WTP-nya dibikin-bikin," Muazzim stated unequivocally during the session. His remarks, roughly translated as, "The average budget realization is only 59%, how can there be a WTP when budget realization is so low? Perhaps the WTP was fabricated," struck at the heart of the matter. This direct challenge implied a potential disconnect between the agency’s financial reporting accuracy and its operational effectiveness and integrity. The low budget absorption rate, in his view, contradicted the very spirit of an unqualified audit, which is meant to reflect not just financial orderliness but also a degree of operational health.

Following Muazzim Akbar’s intervention, Heru Cahyono, another influential member of Commission IX from the Golkar Party faction, echoed similar concerns. Heru highlighted that despite the WTP, the financial report presented by BGN still contained "sejumlah catatan," or "several notes/issues." While the specific nature of these notes was not detailed in the immediate reports, Heru’s observation suggested that even within the framework of an unqualified opinion, underlying problems or areas for improvement were evident, further fueling the commission’s doubts about the agency’s overall performance. The combined critiques from members of different political factions underscored a bipartisan concern regarding the transparency and efficacy of the National Nutrition Agency’s operations.

Supporting Data and Implications of Low Budget Realization

The 59% budget realization rate cited by DPR members is indeed a critical piece of data that warrants closer examination. In the context of Indonesian government agencies, a budget realization rate significantly below 80-90% is generally considered suboptimal and often raises flags regarding an agency’s capacity to implement its programs and utilize allocated resources effectively. Low absorption rates can be indicative of several issues:

Program Implementation Delays: Projects and initiatives may not be launched on time, or their execution may be slow, leading to funds remaining unspent.
Bureaucratic Inefficiencies: Complex procurement processes, administrative hurdles, or lack of coordination between departments can impede timely expenditure.
Capacity Issues: The agency might lack the human resources or technical expertise to manage and execute its programs within the fiscal year.
Planning Deficiencies: Initial budget allocations might not accurately reflect the agency’s actual needs or capacity for expenditure, leading to over-budgeting.
Shifting Priorities or Policy Changes: Mid-year policy adjustments or unforeseen circumstances can sometimes lead to the deferral or cancellation of planned activities.

For an agency like BGN, whose mandate directly impacts public health outcomes, a 59% realization rate is particularly alarming. It implies that nearly half of the allocated funds intended for critical nutrition programs – such as stunting prevention campaigns, distribution of nutrient-rich foods, or educational initiatives – may not have reached their intended beneficiaries or achieved their objectives. Given the persistent challenges of malnutrition in Indonesia, where for instance, the national stunting rate, though improving, still hovers around 20-25% in various regions (actual figures vary by year, but this range is typical for recent years before 2026), the non-utilization of such significant funds represents a lost opportunity to improve the health and future prospects of vulnerable populations.

The fundamental disconnect highlighted by the DPR is that a WTP opinion primarily attests to the accuracy and compliance of financial reporting, not necessarily the efficiency or effectiveness of program execution. An agency could meticulously account for every rupiah spent and ensure all financial procedures are followed (thus earning a WTP), while simultaneously failing to spend a large portion of its budget due to operational bottlenecks. This scenario reveals a crucial gap in performance evaluation, where financial compliance alone does not equate to mission accomplishment.

Komisi IX DPR Cecar BGN usai Pamer Dapat WTP dari BPK: Jangan-jangan Dibikin-bikin

Potential Responses and Perspectives from Related Parties

While the original article did not include direct responses from BGN officials or the BPK, one can logically infer the types of statements that might emerge from such a situation:

From BGN Leadership: BGN officials would likely defend their WTP by emphasizing their adherence to financial accounting standards and regulatory compliance. They might attribute the low budget realization to external factors such as:
- Delayed approvals: Slow bureaucratic processes at higher levels of government or other ministries.
- Procurement challenges: Difficulties in finding suitable vendors, unforeseen price fluctuations, or complex tendering processes.
- Revised program timelines: Adjustments to program implementation schedules due to unforeseen circumstances, natural disasters, or changes in local conditions.
- Focus on quality over speed: Prioritizing meticulous planning and careful execution to ensure program effectiveness, even if it means slower expenditure.
- They might also argue that the WTP reflects their strong internal controls, which prevent misuse of funds, even if the funds are spent slowly.
From the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK): The BPK, if asked to comment, would likely reiterate that their WTP opinion is based strictly on the financial statements’ conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and relevant regulations. They would emphasize that their audit scope primarily covers the fairness of financial presentation and compliance, not necessarily the operational efficiency or effectiveness of an agency’s programs. While their reports often include "management letters" or "notes" on findings that are not material enough to alter the audit opinion, these notes might point to areas like low budget absorption as operational concerns rather than financial misstatements. The BPK’s stance would be to defend the integrity of their audit process and methodology.
From Other DPR Members/Government Officials: The issue could potentially garner broader attention within the government. Other commissions, or even the President’s office, might take an interest, especially given the critical nature of nutrition programs. The Ministry of Finance, responsible for budget oversight, might also weigh in on the implications of consistently low budget absorption across government agencies. There might be calls for a more holistic performance audit framework that integrates financial compliance with program outcomes.

Broader Impact and Implications

The parliamentary questioning of BGN’s WTP, particularly in light of its low budget realization, carries several significant implications for governance, public trust, and policy implementation in Indonesia:

Reinforcement of Parliamentary Oversight: The incident powerfully underscores the crucial role of the DPR as a check on the executive branch. It demonstrates that financial audit opinions, while important, are not the sole determinant of an agency’s performance and that parliamentarians are committed to scrutinizing operational efficiency and actual impact. This proactive oversight is vital for democratic accountability.
Public Trust and Transparency: Such public questioning, while potentially uncomfortable for the agencies involved, ultimately enhances public trust by showing that legislative bodies are actively monitoring how public funds are utilized. If a WTP is perceived as a superficial achievement that masks underlying operational deficiencies, it can erode public confidence in both the audited agency and the audit institution itself. The DPR’s challenge forces a deeper conversation about what "accountability" truly entails beyond mere financial compliance.
Demand for Integrated Performance Metrics: The BGN case highlights a growing need for government agencies to adopt more comprehensive performance measurement frameworks. These frameworks should integrate financial reporting with key performance indicators (KPIs) related to program implementation, output, and outcomes. Relying solely on a WTP without considering budget absorption and actual impact can lead to a skewed perception of an agency’s effectiveness. This could lead to policy discussions on revising audit mandates or introducing parallel performance audits.
Operational Efficiency and Resource Allocation: The scrutiny is likely to compel BGN and potentially other government agencies to reassess their operational strategies, budget planning, and implementation capacities. Agencies with consistently low budget absorption may face stricter budgetary controls, reallocation of funds, or even structural reforms. For BGN, this could mean an urgent review of its program planning, procurement processes, and human resource deployment to ensure more efficient utilization of funds in subsequent fiscal years.
Impact on Critical Public Services: Ultimately, the most significant implication lies in the delivery of essential public services. If BGN cannot effectively spend its budget, critical nutrition programs will be under-resourced, potentially hindering progress in reducing stunting, improving maternal and child health, and enhancing food security. This directly impacts the well-being of millions of Indonesians, particularly the most vulnerable segments of the population. The DPR’s intervention serves as a crucial reminder that budget utilization is not just an administrative metric but a direct determinant of public welfare.

In conclusion, the parliamentary grilling of the National Nutrition Agency over its WTP amidst low budget realization marks a significant moment in Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to enhance government accountability. It challenges the conventional understanding of financial compliance and calls for a more holistic assessment of government agency performance, emphasizing the critical link between robust financial management and effective program delivery in addressing the nation’s pressing developmental challenges. The coming months will likely see increased pressure on BGN to not only maintain its financial integrity but also to demonstrate tangible progress in its mission through improved budget absorption and impactful program implementation.

July 17, 2026 0 comment

Business and Finance

Telkomsel’s IndiHome Unveils Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi to Combat Connectivity Challenges in Modern Indonesian Homes Amid Surging Digital Demand.

by Suro Senen April 20, 2026

written by Suro Senen

Jakarta, VIVA – On Monday, April 20, 2026, at 09:18 WIB, Telkomsel, Indonesia’s leading telecommunications provider, officially announced the nationwide launch of IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi, a sophisticated solution designed to deliver seamless and ubiquitous internet connectivity within homes. This strategic introduction addresses the escalating demand for reliable Wi-Fi, particularly in residences with multiple rooms, floors, or architectural barriers that typically impede conventional router performance. The service, which leverages advanced "mesh" technology, became available to both new and existing IndiHome customers across Indonesia starting March 3, 2026, marking a significant step in enhancing the home digital experience.

The genesis of IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi stems from a profound shift in household digital consumption patterns. The post-pandemic era has solidified the prevalence of remote work (WFH) and online learning, transforming homes into multifaceted hubs for productivity, education, and entertainment. This evolution has exposed the limitations of traditional Wi-Fi setups, where parents often struggle with patchy connections while working from a study or bedroom, concurrently with children engaging in online classes or streaming high-definition content in the living room. The simultaneous, high-bandwidth activities necessitate a robust, evenly distributed Wi-Fi signal, a challenge that conventional single-router systems often fail to meet.

The Evolution of Home Connectivity and the Mesh Solution

For years, households have relied on a single Wi-Fi router, typically positioned centrally, to broadcast internet signals. However, as homes grew larger and became filled with more connected devices and physical obstructions like thick walls or multiple floors, dead zones and inconsistent signal strength became commonplace. Wi-Fi extenders or repeaters emerged as a stop-gap solution, but these often created separate network names (SSIDs) and required manual switching, disrupting the user experience and failing to maintain consistent speeds.

Mesh Wi-Fi technology represents a paradigm shift from these older models. Instead of a single point of access, a mesh system consists of multiple interconnected nodes (or satellites) that communicate with each other to form a unified, intelligent network. Each node acts as a mini-router, relaying signals across the home and eliminating dead zones. This interconnected web ensures that devices automatically connect to the strongest available signal as users move around the house, a feature known as "seamless roaming."

IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi embodies this technological leap. It is designed as a plug-and-play solution, emphasizing user-friendliness and efficient setup. The system operates under a single, centralized Wi-Fi network (single SSID or "access point"), meaning users no longer need to manually switch between different network names when moving from one room to another. This seamless transition ensures uninterrupted connectivity, crucial for video calls, online gaming, or continuous streaming.

Addressing the Modern Home’s Connectivity Needs

Hardika Nugroho, Vice President of Home Broadband & FMC Marketing at Telkomsel, articulated the company’s vision behind the new offering. "Wi-Fi services should not be complicated. That’s why we designed IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi as a practical solution to deliver more even signal coverage to various areas of the home, including multi-story residences or those with thick walls," Nugroho stated. He further emphasized, "With a single network and automatic connection handover, families can engage in digital activities more comfortably from anywhere in the house." This statement underscores Telkomsel’s commitment to user experience and solving real-world connectivity frustrations.

The differentiation between mesh technology and conventional Wi-Fi extenders is stark and critical to understanding the value proposition of IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi. While extenders merely amplify an existing signal, often at the cost of bandwidth and creating new, distinct networks, mesh systems build a cohesive, self-optimizing network. This means that instead of users manually selecting a different access point, their devices are intelligently handed off to the node providing the best signal, maintaining optimal performance throughout the entire home. This is particularly beneficial for larger households, multi-story buildings, and families with numerous smart devices simultaneously accessing the internet.

Comparative Advantages: Mesh vs. Traditional

To illustrate the superiority, consider the following distinctions:

Network Identification (SSID): IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi operates with a single SSID, creating one unified network. In contrast, conventional routers with extenders typically result in multiple SSIDs, forcing users to switch manually.
Roaming Capability: Mesh technology offers seamless roaming, where devices automatically connect to the strongest node without interruption. Traditional setups require manual access point switching, leading to dropped connections or buffering.
Coverage Uniformity: Mesh systems provide consistently strong and even coverage across all rooms, regardless of layout or architectural barriers. Traditional setups often suffer from signal degradation and dead zones depending on the extender’s placement.
Scalability and Design: Mesh systems are designed for comprehensive coverage in homes ranging from small to large and multi-story. Traditional extenders offer limited range expansion, highly dependent on their proximity to the main router.
Performance: Mesh ensures more consistent speeds and lower latency across the entire network due to its intelligent routing and backhaul capabilities, whereas extenders can introduce bottlenecks and latency issues.

This advanced capability is not merely a convenience; it is a necessity for the modern digital household. With the proliferation of smart home devices—from smart speakers and lighting systems to security cameras and thermostats—a stable, pervasive Wi-Fi network is the backbone of a truly connected living space. Each smart device adds to the network load, and a mesh system is inherently better equipped to handle this increased density without compromising performance for any single device or user.

The Broader Context: Indonesia’s Digital Landscape

Indonesia, with its vast archipelago and rapidly growing digital economy, presents unique opportunities and challenges for internet service providers. The country has seen a significant surge in internet penetration, with millions of new users coming online annually. According to various reports, internet penetration in Indonesia hovers around 70-80% of the population, with mobile internet leading, but fixed broadband gaining steady traction, especially in urban and suburban areas. The demand for reliable fixed broadband connections has been amplified by government initiatives promoting digital literacy and the sustained impact of remote work and learning.

Telkomsel, a subsidiary of Telkom Indonesia, holds a dominant position in the country’s telecommunications sector. Its IndiHome fixed broadband service is a cornerstone of its strategy to offer integrated digital solutions. The introduction of Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi aligns perfectly with Telkomsel’s broader Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC) strategy, aiming to provide a holistic connectivity experience that spans both mobile and fixed lines. By enhancing the in-home Wi-Fi experience, Telkomsel strengthens its competitive edge in a market where quality of service is increasingly a key differentiator.

The Indonesian broadband market is competitive, with players like Biznet, First Media, and others vying for market share. These providers are also continuously upgrading their infrastructure and offerings. Telkomsel’s move with IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi sets a new benchmark for in-home Wi-Fi quality, potentially spurring other providers to follow suit or innovate further, ultimately benefiting consumers.

Implementation and Availability

Telkomsel has made IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi available nationwide, underscoring its commitment to broad accessibility. The "plug-and-play" design suggests that customers will find installation straightforward, likely involving connecting the main mesh node to their existing IndiHome modem/router and strategically placing additional satellite nodes around their home. The ease of setup is a critical factor for widespread adoption, as many users prefer solutions that do not require technical expertise.

While specific pricing details for the "two options" mentioned in the article’s continuation are not provided in this excerpt, it is common for such advanced Wi-Fi solutions to be offered either as an add-on service to existing broadband plans, as part of premium tiered packages, or through rental/purchase options for the mesh hardware. This flexibility allows Telkomsel to cater to a diverse customer base with varying needs and budgets, from basic users seeking to eliminate dead zones to power users demanding peak performance for multiple demanding applications.

Implications and Future Outlook

The launch of IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi carries significant implications for both consumers and the broader telecommunications industry in Indonesia. For consumers, it promises an end to common Wi-Fi frustrations, enabling truly seamless digital living. The enhanced connectivity will facilitate more efficient remote work, uninterrupted online education, higher-quality entertainment streaming, and robust support for the growing ecosystem of smart home devices. This improved experience is likely to boost customer satisfaction and loyalty for IndiHome.

From an industry perspective, this move solidifies Telkomsel’s position as an innovator and a leader in providing comprehensive digital solutions. By addressing a critical pain point in home connectivity, Telkomsel is not only enhancing its existing IndiHome service but also setting a new standard for in-home Wi-Fi performance in the Indonesian market. This could drive increased adoption of higher-speed broadband plans, as users can now fully utilize the bandwidth they subscribe to across their entire property.

Looking ahead, the widespread adoption of mesh Wi-Fi technology lays the groundwork for future advancements in smart home integration and the Internet of Things (IoT). A robust and pervasive home network is essential for connecting an ever-increasing array of smart devices and services. IndiHome Ultra Mesh Wi-Fi positions Telkomsel and its customers at the forefront of this evolving digital landscape, ensuring that Indonesian homes are well-equipped for the demands of tomorrow’s connected world. This strategic offering is more than just a product launch; it is an investment in the digital future of Indonesian households, empowering families to unlock the full potential of their digital lives.

April 20, 2026 0 comment

Entertainment and Celebrity

Anggun C Sasmi and Maudy Ayunda Detail Extreme Physical Challenges and Hair Care Routines During the Production of Para Perasuk

by Lina Irawan November 11, 2025

written by Lina Irawan

The highly anticipated Indonesian feature film Para Perasuk held an exclusive pre-screening event at the XXI Epicentrum in South Jakarta on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, ahead of its scheduled nationwide release on April 23. The event featured a prominent appearance by the film’s leading stars, international music icon Anggun C. Sasmi and acclaimed actress-singer Maudy Ayunda, who shared their experiences regarding the rigorous and often grueling production process. Directed by the visionary filmmaker Wregas Bhanuteja, the film explores the supernatural and cultural complexities of a fictional village, demanding high levels of physical and emotional endurance from its cast.

Para Perasuk introduces audiences to the enigmatic Desa Latas, a village steeped in a unique and haunting tradition known as "Pesta Sambetan." This ritual involves a mass possession ceremony where participants are said to be inhabited by twenty distinct animal spirits. The narrative depth of the film, which blends elements of folk horror with psychological drama, required the production team to scout and utilize remote locations that could authentically portray the rugged atmosphere of Desa Latas. However, this commitment to authenticity brought about significant environmental challenges for the actors and crew.

During the exclusive interview session held in partnership with Pantene, Anggun C. Sasmi provided insight into the harsh realities of the filming environment. She noted that the production schedule was relentless, often requiring the cast to move between complex scenes with minimal transition time. The primary adversary for the cast was the climate; the combination of intense tropical heat and pervasive dust created a taxing environment for both the actors’ physical stamina and their personal grooming maintenance. Anggun described a routine where she had to resort to "first aid" measures to manage the physical toll of the heat on her appearance.

Anggun explained that the heat was so intense it became impossible to manage through standard means. Between takes, she frequently applied ice packs to her face to prevent swelling and to soothe skin that was reacting to the extreme temperatures. This was not merely a matter of comfort but a necessity to maintain visual consistency for the camera. Furthermore, she highlighted the struggle of maintaining hair health under such conditions. With constant exposure to dust and sun, her hair required specialized care to remain resilient throughout the weeks of production. The actress emphasized that the contrast between the chaotic, dusty sets and the necessary "glamour" of the characters presented a constant logistical hurdle.

Maudy Ayunda echoed these sentiments, describing her own set of challenges that went beyond the heat. In several pivotal scenes, Maudy was required to interact with the natural elements of the rural setting in ways that were physically demanding and occasionally unhygienic. She recounted instances where she had to be covered in mud or was exposed to water dripping from overhead structures, including chicken coops. The uncertainty of the water’s origin and the tactile discomfort of being covered in grime for hours on end added a layer of difficulty to her performance.

For Maudy, the conclusion of a filming day became a ritual of recovery. She noted that the process of cleansing herself—washing away the mud, dust, and unidentified fluids—was the highlight of her daily routine. The actress shared that the sensory transition from the "sticky and hot" environment of the set to the refreshing experience of a cold shower and hair care routine was essential for her mental and physical well-being. This routine allowed her to reset for the following day’s demands, highlighting the importance of high-quality personal care products in the demanding world of professional filmmaking.

The Cultural Context of Para Perasuk and Desa Latas

The film’s premise is rooted in the rich tapestry of Indonesian folklore, specifically the concept of "Sambetan." In Javanese culture, "Sambetan" often refers to the belief that a person can be "touched" or inhabited by a spirit, often resulting in illness or a trance-like state. By expanding this concept into a "pesta" or festival involving twenty animal spirits, the film creates a vivid, albeit terrifying, cinematic world. This narrative choice places Para Perasuk within a growing trend of Indonesian cinema that seeks to elevate local traditions into high-concept supernatural thrillers.

Industry analysts suggest that the involvement of high-profile figures like Anggun and Maudy Ayunda is a strategic move to broaden the film’s appeal both domestically and internationally. Anggun, who has spent decades as a global ambassador for Indonesian talent, brings a level of international prestige to the project. Maudy Ayunda, known for her intellectual depth and versatile acting, provides a strong emotional core for the story. Their collaboration under the direction of Wregas Bhanuteja—who gained international acclaim with his previous work, such as Penyalin Cahaya (Photocopier)—signals a production of significant artistic ambition.

Production Chronology and Technical Demands

The journey of Para Perasuk from concept to the big screen has been a multi-year endeavor. Pre-production began in late 2024, focusing heavily on the world-building aspects of Desa Latas. The production team spent months researching traditional rituals and animal movements to choreograph the mass possession scenes accurately. Filming took place throughout 2025 in various secluded locations across Indonesia, chosen for their untouched landscapes and atmospheric qualities.

The technical demands of the film were immense. To capture the "Pesta Sambetan," the cinematography team utilized specialized lighting and camera movements to simulate the chaotic energy of a mass trance. The makeup and effects department also faced the challenge of creating the look of twenty different animal spirits without relying solely on digital effects, opting instead for a blend of practical makeup, prosthetics, and physical acting. This commitment to practical effects contributed to the "mud and dust" reality described by the actors, as they were often in the thick of the action rather than in front of a green screen.

Strategic Brand Partnerships in Film Promotion

The pre-screening event also underscored the increasing role of brand partnerships in the Indonesian film industry. The collaboration with Pantene served as a platform for the actors to discuss the intersection of their professional work and personal maintenance. In an industry where an actor’s appearance is part of their professional toolkit, the stresses of a location shoot can have long-term effects. By discussing their hair care and skincare routines, Anggun and Maudy highlighted a relatable aspect of their work, bridging the gap between the supernatural world of the film and the everyday realities of their fans.

Marketing experts note that such partnerships are beneficial for both parties. For the film, it provides additional promotional avenues and high-profile events. For the brand, it aligns their products with the resilience and beauty of respected public figures. The narrative of "maintaining strength under pressure"—whether it be the strength of one’s hair or the strength of one’s character in a horror film—creates a cohesive marketing message that resonates with a wide audience.

Broader Implications for the Indonesian Film Industry

The release of Para Perasuk is expected to be a significant milestone for the Indonesian film industry in 2026. Over the past decade, the domestic market has seen a surge in the quality and quantity of locally produced films, with horror and supernatural thrillers leading the charge in terms of box office revenue. However, Para Perasuk aims to distinguish itself by moving beyond simple "jump scares" and focusing on deep-seated cultural fears and high-concept storytelling.

The film’s success would further validate the "auteur" approach to genre filmmaking in Indonesia, where directors like Wregas Bhanuteja are given the creative freedom to explore complex themes within a commercial framework. Furthermore, the participation of an international figure like Anggun suggests that Indonesian films are increasingly being viewed as viable products for the global market, capable of attracting talent and audiences beyond Southeast Asia.

As the April 23 release date approaches, the buzz surrounding Para Perasuk continues to grow. The anecdotes shared by Anggun and Maudy Ayunda regarding the "torturous" but rewarding filming process have only added to the intrigue. Audiences are eager to see how the extreme conditions of the production translated into the final cinematic experience and how the haunting traditions of Desa Latas will be brought to life on the silver screen.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

Para Perasuk stands as a testament to the evolving landscape of Indonesian cinema, where traditional folklore meets modern production standards. The physical sacrifices made by the cast, from enduring extreme heat to being covered in the grime of a rural set, reflect a dedication to the craft that is becoming a hallmark of the country’s top-tier productions. With a star-studded cast, a visionary director, and a narrative rooted in the deep cultural psyche of the region, the film is poised to be both a critical and commercial landmark.

Following its Indonesian premiere, there are reports that Para Perasuk will be submitted to several international film festivals, continuing the trend of Indonesian cinema making waves on the global stage. For now, the domestic audience awaits the chance to enter Desa Latas and witness the "Pesta Sambetan" for themselves, knowing that the polished performances they see on screen were forged in the heat, dust, and mud of a truly challenging production.

November 11, 2025 0 comment

Lifestyle and Fashion

Medical Experts Highlight Risk Factors and Screening Challenges for Congenital Heart Disease Among Indonesian Newborns

by Siti Muinah July 29, 2025

written by Siti Muinah

Congenital Heart Disease (CHD), known locally in Indonesia as Penyakit Jantung Bawaan (PJB), remains one of the most significant challenges in pediatric medicine, characterized by structural abnormalities of the heart that are present from birth. While the precise etiology of many cases remains elusive, medical experts are increasingly identifying a range of modifiable risk factors and systemic barriers to care that contribute to high mortality rates in Indonesia. Dr. Rizky Adriansyah, MKed, a pediatric specialist and the Chairman of the Cardiology Coordination Unit of the Indonesian Pediatric Society (IDAI), recently emphasized that while direct cause-and-effect relationships are difficult to pinpoint, certain environmental and physiological factors during pregnancy play a pivotal role in the development of these defects.

Speaking during a specialized webinar, Dr. Rizky noted that the complexity of CHD stems from the intricate process of fetal heart formation, which occurs very early in the first trimester of pregnancy. Because the heart is one of the first organs to develop, any disruption during these critical weeks can lead to permanent structural issues. Although the medical community continues to research the genetic underpinnings of CHD, current preventative strategies focus heavily on managing maternal health and environmental exposures during the gestational period.

Primary Risk Factors and the Importance of Prenatal Care

In contemporary medical literature, three primary risk factors have emerged as significant contributors to the incidence of CHD. The first is maternal infection, specifically the Rubella virus. Rubella, or German measles, is known to be teratogenic, meaning it can interfere with normal fetal development. When a pregnant woman contracts Rubella, the virus can cross the placenta and disrupt the formation of the fetal heart valves and chambers. This underscores the vital importance of the Rubella vaccine, which should ideally be administered well before conception to ensure the mother has sufficient immunity.

The second critical factor is nutritional deficiency, particularly a lack of folic acid. Folic acid, a B-vitamin, is essential for DNA synthesis and cell growth. A deficiency during the earliest stages of pregnancy is strongly linked not only to neural tube defects but also to cardiac malformations. Medical professionals urge women of childbearing age to maintain a diet rich in folate and to take supplements as soon as they plan to conceive, as the window for heart development often closes before a woman even realizes she is pregnant.

The third factor involves the consumption of certain medications by the mother. Specifically, anti-seizure medications (anticonvulsants) have been flagged as potentially increasing the risk of cardiac defects. Dr. Rizky pointed out that while these medications may be necessary for the mother’s health, their use must be closely monitored and balanced by a healthcare provider. Other historical risk factors, such as maternal smoking and alcohol consumption, remain relevant; however, the medical community notes that many cases of CHD occur in children whose mothers did not engage in these behaviors, suggesting that the condition is often the result of a complex interplay between genetics and environment.

The Statistical Burden of Congenital Heart Disease in Indonesia

The impact of CHD on neonatal health in Indonesia is profound. According to national data from 2017, CHD is the second leading cause of death during the neonatal period, accounting for approximately 17 percent of all infant deaths, surpassed only by complications related to prematurity. This statistic highlights a major public health crisis, as the survival of these infants often depends on the speed and accuracy of their diagnosis and subsequent medical intervention.

Global data from the World Health Organization (WHO) aligns with these concerns, suggesting that approximately one out of every 100 newborns worldwide suffers from some form of CHD. Of these cases, an estimated 25 percent are classified as "critical" CHD. Critical CHD refers to defects that require surgery or catheter intervention within the first year of life—and often within the first few days or weeks—to ensure the infant’s survival. In the Indonesian context, this translates to roughly two to four cases of critical CHD for every 1,000 live births. Given Indonesia’s high birth rate, the absolute number of affected children is substantial, placing a heavy burden on the nation’s specialized cardiac centers.

Barriers to Effective Treatment and Diagnosis

Despite the prevalence of the condition, Dr. Rizky revealed a sobering reality: less than 50 percent of CHD cases in Indonesia are currently being handled or treated effectively. This gap in care is the result of a multi-faceted crisis involving geography, infrastructure, and human resources.

One of the primary obstacles is the uneven distribution of medical facilities. Most advanced cardiac centers capable of performing pediatric heart surgery are located in major urban hubs, particularly on the island of Java. For families living in remote provinces or on outer islands, accessing these facilities is a logistical and financial nightmare. Furthermore, there is a significant shortage of pediatric cardiologists and specialized cardiovascular surgeons. The ratio of specialists to the total population remains far below the levels recommended for a country of Indonesia’s size.

Beyond physical access, there is the issue of diagnostic tools. Many primary health centers (Puskesmas) and regional hospitals lack the echocardiography machines necessary to visualize heart defects. Even when the equipment is available, there may not be enough trained personnel to interpret the results accurately. This is compounded by a general lack of public awareness; many parents do not recognize the subtle signs of a heart defect, leading to late-stage presentations where the child’s condition has already deteriorated.

Clinical Manifestations and the Role of Early Screening

Recognizing the symptoms of CHD is crucial for early intervention. One of the most common clinical signs in infants is a failure to thrive, characterized by slow weight gain despite adequate feeding. In more severe or critical cases, infants may exhibit cyanosis (a bluish tint to the skin, lips, or fingernails caused by low oxygen levels), rapid breathing, or excessive sweating, especially during feeding.

Dr. Rizky emphasized that critical CHD can often be detected within the first 24 to 48 hours of life, or at the latest, within the first week. To improve detection rates, medical experts advocate for the use of pulse oximetry screening. This is a non-invasive, fast, and cost-effective test that measures the oxygen saturation in a newborn’s blood. By placing a sensor on the baby’s right hand and either foot, healthcare providers can identify low oxygen levels that might indicate a heart defect before the baby even shows outward symptoms.

In addition to pulse oximetry, the traditional stethoscope remains a vital tool. The presence of a heart murmur—an unusual sound heard between heartbeats—is often the first red flag. While not all murmurs indicate a serious problem, any "organic" or suspicious murmur in a newborn warrants an immediate referral for an echocardiogram.

Strengthening the Healthcare Referral System and Public Education

To combat the high mortality rate associated with CHD, there is a pressing need to empower frontline healthcare workers, including midwives and general practitioners. In many parts of Indonesia, midwives are the primary attendants at births. Dr. Rizky suggested that if midwives are trained to perform basic screenings like pulse oximetry—a process that takes less than five minutes—the rate of early detection could rise significantly.

The "Sehatkan Jantung Anak Indonesia" (Healthy Hearts for Indonesian Children) initiative, which includes educational content on platforms like YouTube, serves as a resource for both parents and medical professionals. By providing clear, accessible information on how to conduct screenings and what symptoms to watch for, these digital tools aim to bridge the information gap in remote areas.

The broader implication of failing to address CHD is not just the loss of young lives, but also the long-term economic and social cost. Children with untreated heart defects often face chronic health issues, reduced quality of life, and increased healthcare costs for their families and the state. Conversely, early intervention—whether through medication, catheter-based procedures, or open-heart surgery—can often lead to a full and productive life.

A Call for Systemic Reform and National Awareness

The challenge of Congenital Heart Disease in Indonesia requires a coordinated response from the government, the medical community, and the public. From a policy perspective, there must be a continued effort to decentralize specialized cardiac care and provide better incentives for medical specialists to work in underserved regions. Strengthening the National Health Insurance (JKN) scheme to cover the high costs of cardiac interventions is also essential to ensure that life-saving treatment is not a privilege of the wealthy.

Furthermore, public health campaigns must continue to emphasize the importance of the "Golden Period"—the window of time where medical intervention is most effective. Preventing CHD starts with maternal health, but saving a child born with the condition starts with a prompt diagnosis. As Dr. Rizky concluded, while prevention during pregnancy is the ideal, once a child is born with a heart defect, the focus must shift entirely to rapid detection and treatment.

By integrating simple screening methods like pulse oximetry into standard newborn care protocols across all Indonesian provinces, the healthcare system can begin to close the gap between the number of cases and the number of survivors. The goal is a future where no child’s life is cut short by a treatable heart condition simply because of where they were born or a lack of awareness regarding their symptoms. The ongoing efforts of the IDAI and other health organizations represent a critical step toward achieving that vision, but the road ahead remains long and requires sustained national commitment.

July 29, 2025 0 comment

Business and Finance

Rismon Sianipar Denies Multi-Billion Rupiah Pay-Out, Challenges Roy Suryo to Scientifically Substantiate Claims

by Reynand Wu June 25, 2025

written by Reynand Wu

JAKARTA – Forensic expert Rismon Sianipar has vehemently denied allegations from the camp of Roy Suryo that he received billions of rupiah, potentially up to Rp50 billion, following his public apology and admission of error to former President Joko Widodo (Jokowi). Sianipar, whose recantation earlier sparked considerable debate, has now issued a direct challenge to Roy Suryo, demanding scientific proof for the claims presented in the controversial book, "Jokowi’s White Paper." This latest development, unfolding on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, escalates an already protracted and politically charged dispute surrounding the authenticity of President Widodo’s academic qualifications.

The controversy dates back several years, rooted in persistent claims questioning the legitimacy of President Jokowi’s diploma from Gadjah Mada University (UGM). These allegations, often amplified in online discourse and by political opponents, gained traction and led to public scrutiny. At the heart of these claims was "Jokowi’s White Paper," a document or publication reportedly detailing purported inconsistencies and anomalies in the President’s educational background. Roy Suryo, a prominent figure known for his background in information technology and multimedia, became a vocal proponent of these claims, lending his perceived expertise to the arguments presented in the White Paper. His involvement amplified the controversy, positioning it as a matter requiring expert forensic scrutiny.

Rismon Sianipar, an expert in forensic analysis, initially entered the fray, reportedly contributing to or supporting the narrative that questioned the authenticity of President Jokowi’s diploma. His early statements and analyses, presented within the public domain, were interpreted by some as bolstering the claims made in "Jokowi’s White Paper." His involvement was significant because, as a forensic expert, his opinions carried a certain weight, potentially influencing public perception regarding the veracity of the allegations. The public awaited a definitive resolution, often caught between conflicting expert opinions and politically motivated narratives.

However, the narrative took a dramatic turn when Sianipar, after conducting what he described as further in-depth research, publicly retracted his earlier statements and issued a formal apology to President Jokowi. In a move that surprised many observers, Sianipar admitted that his prior findings or interpretations had been erroneous. This recantation was a pivotal moment, as it undermined a significant pillar of the claims against the President’s diploma. Sianipar’s rationale for this shift, as he explained, was a commitment to scientific integrity and the rectification of any inaccuracies discovered through continued research. He emphasized that as a researcher, an independent and unbiased approach is paramount, and the admission of error is an ethical obligation when new evidence or understanding emerges.

Following Sianipar’s recantation and apology, a new wave of accusations emerged from Roy Suryo’s camp. These allegations suggested that Sianipar’s change of stance was not driven by scientific discovery but by financial inducement. Specifically, it was claimed that Sianipar had received a substantial sum of money, with figures ranging into the billions of rupiah, some reports even citing Rp50 billion, from President Jokowi’s side as a payoff for retracting his earlier statements. These claims quickly circulated, adding another layer of complexity and suspicion to an already sensitive issue. The accusations implied a deliberate attempt to manipulate expert testimony for political gain, raising serious questions about the integrity of the individuals involved and the broader implications for public trust in expert opinions.

In response to these grave allegations, Rismon Sianipar convened a press conference on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, to unequivocally refute the claims of financial impropriety. "I want to clarify the issue circulating outside that I received billions, even tens of billions, up to Rp50 billion," Sianipar stated firmly. "I vehemently deny this. The entire RJ process was my initiative, based on the research I conducted." The "RJ process" Sianipar referred to, while not explicitly defined as a formal legal mechanism in this context, appears to denote his personal initiative for reconciliation and correction based on his updated research findings. He underscored that his actions were a result of his independent investigative work and a commitment to scientific truth, not any external pressure or financial incentive.

Sianipar further elaborated on the illogical nature of the accusations. He argued that it defies common sense for someone who has admitted an error and apologized to the wronged party to then receive a substantial payment from that very party. "I admitted my mistake and apologized to Jokowi, so logically it wouldn’t be possible," he explained. "If anything, I should be the one compensating Jokowi for the error I made." This argument highlights Sianipar’s position that his actions were driven by remorse and a commitment to rectifying his research, rather than being a transaction. He painted a picture of a researcher upholding ethical standards, even when it meant publicly acknowledging a previous mistake, and saw the accusations of bribery as a smear campaign.

Beyond simply denying the financial allegations, Sianipar issued a direct and pointed challenge to Roy Suryo. He called upon Suryo to scientifically substantiate the claims made in "Jokowi’s White Paper." This challenge elevates the dispute from a personal attack to a demand for rigorous scientific evidence, placing the onus on Suryo to demonstrate the academic and forensic integrity of his assertions. Sianipar’s demand implies that the White Paper, if it purports to be based on expert analysis, must withstand scientific scrutiny and peer review, rather than relying on unsubstantiated allegations or politically motivated interpretations. This move shifts the focus back to the core subject matter: the scientific validity of the claims against President Jokowi’s diploma.

The dispute between Sianipar and Roy Suryo, alongside the broader diploma controversy, carries significant implications for various stakeholders and the wider public. Primarily, it underscores the critical importance of scientific integrity and independence, particularly for forensic experts whose opinions can profoundly influence public perception and legal outcomes. When experts are perceived to be swayed by political agendas or financial incentives, it erodes trust in scientific methodology and the impartiality of expert testimony. This erosion of trust can have far-reaching consequences, making it difficult for the public to discern truth from misinformation, especially in politically charged environments.

From a political standpoint, the ongoing saga highlights the weaponization of information and expert opinions in political discourse. Allegations surrounding a leader’s qualifications, regardless of their veracity, can be potent tools for delegitimizing an administration or individual. The constant back-and-forth, with accusations of bribery and demands for scientific proof, serves to prolong the controversy, keeping it alive in the public consciousness and potentially creating an atmosphere of doubt and suspicion. For President Jokowi’s administration, while Sianipar’s apology offered some vindication, the continued allegations of payoff introduce a new layer of complexity that requires careful management.

Legal implications are also a significant consideration. The accusations of bribery against Sianipar, if proven false, could potentially lead to defamation lawsuits. Conversely, if there were any credible evidence of financial inducement, it could open avenues for legal action against those involved. The demand for scientific proof of "Jokowi’s White Paper" could also lead to legal challenges, forcing the proponents of the paper to present their evidence in a court of law or face accusations of spreading unsubstantiated claims. The legal ramifications could extend to professional bodies governing forensic experts, potentially leading to ethical inquiries or sanctions if misconduct is established.

Reactions from other parties involved in the wider political landscape have been anticipated. While no direct statements from President Jokowi’s office were immediately available regarding the latest allegations, it is plausible that any official response would emphasize the importance of truth, the rule of law, and the President’s legitimate qualifications. For Roy Suryo’s camp, a likely response would be to double down on their accusations, perhaps questioning Sianipar’s credibility further or demanding a more transparent account of his finances and the circumstances surrounding his recantation. Legal representatives for Suryo might also reiterate their belief in the claims made in "Jokowi’s White Paper," perhaps indicating a willingness to present their evidence if challenged in a formal setting. Independent legal and ethical experts would likely stress the need for evidence-based claims, the perils of trial by media, and the importance of due process in resolving such disputes.

The future trajectory of this dispute remains uncertain. Sianipar’s challenge to Roy Suryo could potentially lead to a formal scientific review or debate, a development that would be welcomed by those seeking clarity and evidence-based conclusions. Alternatively, the dispute could devolve into further legal battles, with both parties seeking redress through the courts. What is clear, however, is that this ongoing controversy transcends the immediate individuals involved. It serves as a stark reminder of the challenges in maintaining factual integrity in an age of rapid information dissemination, particularly when political stakes are high. The public’s demand for transparency, accountability, and verifiable truth will continue to press for a definitive resolution to the lingering questions surrounding President Jokowi’s diploma and the conduct of those involved in the public discourse. The resolution of this specific contention will undoubtedly influence future standards for expert testimony and public debate in Indonesia’s dynamic political landscape.

June 25, 2025 0 comment