adya

The Military Court II-08 Jakarta reconvened on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, for a pivotal session in the ongoing legal battle concerning the alleged assault of Faisal Handri, an employee of prominent Indonesian actress and entrepreneur Zaskia Adya Mecca, by an individual member of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). The day’s proceedings saw a significant development with the highly anticipated testimony of Zaskia Mecca’s son, Kalla Madani, who was called to the stand as a key witness. Due to Kalla’s status as a minor, the session was conducted behind closed doors, a standard procedure designed to protect the privacy and well-being of underage witnesses. Despite the confidential nature of the hearing, Kalla Madani, accompanied by his mother, briefly addressed the media scrum present outside the courtroom, offering a glimpse into his experience. Zaskia Mecca initiated the conversation, asking her son, "Well, you’ve done it, tell us, how was it?" Kalla responded, "It was a bit tense when they asked questions." Pushing for more detail, Zaskia inquired, "But how did it feel?" to which Kalla replied, "It felt… yes, just comfortable." This brief exchange underscored the delicate balance between the legal imperative for testimony and the need to safeguard a child’s emotional state during arduous legal processes.

Background to the Incident and Initial Proceedings

The case stems from an incident that reportedly occurred in late 2025, involving Faisal Handri, a long-serving employee within Zaskia Adya Mecca’s extensive business ventures, which span fashion, culinary arts, and creative industries. While specific details surrounding the initial altercation remain under judicial seal, it is understood that Handri sustained injuries allegedly inflicted by an individual identified as an "oknum TNI," a term in Indonesia denoting a member of the armed forces acting outside their official duties or in a personal capacity. Such cases often draw significant public attention due to the involvement of military personnel, raising questions about accountability and the rule of law within the armed forces.

Following the alleged assault, Zaskia Adya Mecca, known for her strong public presence and advocacy, reportedly took swift action, ensuring Handri received medical attention and initiating legal proceedings. The decision to pursue the case in a military court indicates that the accused individual was identified and confirmed as an active member of the TNI, placing the jurisdiction under the military justice system rather than the civilian courts, a characteristic feature of Indonesia’s legal framework for military personnel. The preliminary stages of the investigation likely involved military police (POM TNI) before the case was formally handed over to the military prosecutor for indictment and subsequent trial at the Military Court II-08 Jakarta. This particular court is designated to handle offenses committed by military personnel within its territorial jurisdiction, ensuring that disciplinary and criminal actions against TNI members adhere to specific military laws and procedures.

The Unique Role of Military Justice in Indonesia

Indonesia operates a dual justice system, with distinct civilian and military courts. The military justice system, governed primarily by Law No. 31 of 1997 on Military Courts, is designed to maintain discipline and enforce laws within the armed forces. When a TNI member commits a criminal offense, even if against a civilian, they are typically tried in a military court. This system, while intended to uphold internal military discipline, occasionally faces scrutiny regarding transparency and public access, especially when cases involve civilians as victims or witnesses. The Military Court II-08 Jakarta, where this trial is being held, is one of several such courts across the archipelago, tasked with adjudicating a wide range of offenses from insubordination to serious criminal acts. The presence of such a high-profile case, involving a celebrity and a child witness, undoubtedly places the court’s procedures and eventual verdict under heightened public and media scrutiny.

The Child Witness and Legal Protections

The decision to call Kalla Madani, an underage witness, to testify underscores the crucial nature of his potential observations or knowledge regarding the incident involving Faisal Handri. While the exact reasons for his presence during or immediately after the alleged assault have not been disclosed, his testimony is evidently considered vital to the prosecution’s case. Indonesian law provides robust protections for child witnesses, primarily through Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection and Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. These statutes mandate special treatment for children involved in legal proceedings, including the provision of a safe and child-friendly environment, the presence of accompanying adults (such as parents or guardians), and the option for closed-door sessions to prevent undue stress or exposure to public scrutiny. The objective is to gather essential testimony while minimizing potential trauma to the child.

The closed-door nature of Kalla’s testimony on April 15, 2026, was a direct application of these protective measures. Legal experts suggest that such arrangements are crucial not only for the child’s psychological well-being but also to ensure the integrity of their testimony, free from external pressures or media influence. Child psychologists often recommend that children be prepared for court proceedings, with explanations tailored to their age, and that their interactions with legal professionals be conducted in a sensitive and empathetic manner. Zaskia Mecca’s presence and her supportive interaction with Kalla post-testimony are indicative of the kind of parental support deemed essential in such situations.

Chronology and Previous Sessions

While the precise timeline leading up to the April 15, 2026, hearing has not been fully disseminated to the public, a plausible sequence of events can be inferred based on standard legal procedures in Indonesia:

• Late 2025: The alleged assault on Faisal Handri occurs. Details of the incident are reported to relevant authorities, likely involving an initial report to civilian police, followed by the identification of the alleged perpetrator as a TNI member, leading to a transfer of jurisdiction to military police.
• Early 2026: Military police conduct an investigation, gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and potentially apprehending the accused TNI member. The military prosecutor then reviews the findings and formalizes charges.
• February/March 2026: The trial commences at Military Court II-08 Jakarta. Initial sessions would typically involve the reading of the indictment, the presentation of preliminary evidence by the prosecution, and the testimonies of initial witnesses, potentially including Faisal Handri himself and other adults who may have witnessed or had knowledge of the incident.
• April 15, 2026: The current session, featuring the testimony of Kalla Madani, highlights a critical juncture in the trial, suggesting that the court is moving towards gathering all crucial witness accounts before proceeding to the defense phase.

The progression of the trial indicates a diligent effort by the military justice system to thoroughly examine the evidence and hear all relevant parties. Each session contributes to building a comprehensive picture for the judges, who will ultimately render a verdict based on the facts presented and the applicable military and criminal laws.

Statements and Reactions: Navigating Public Scrutiny

Zaskia Adya Mecca’s public statements, though brief, carry significant weight. Her direct engagement with Kalla after his testimony, asking about his experience, not only demonstrates maternal care but also subtly reinforces the gravity of the situation and her commitment to seeing justice served. Her inquiry about Kalla feeling "comfortable" despite the initial tension suggests a proactive effort to ensure his psychological well-being throughout the stressful process. For Zaskia, this case is not merely about an employee but also about the integrity of the legal process and the protection of her family.

Kalla Madani’s candid admission of feeling "a bit tense" followed by a sense of "comfort" is a powerful testament to the emotional rollercoaster a child experiences in such a setting. The tension likely stemmed from the formal courtroom environment, the presence of judges, and the weight of recounting events. The subsequent feeling of comfort could be attributed to several factors: the supportive presence of his mother, the perceived empathetic approach of the court officials, or simply the relief of having completed his task. His ability to articulate these feelings, even briefly, offers a rare glimpse into the often-unseen emotional toll on child witnesses.

From a broader perspective, the involvement of an "oknum TNI" in an assault case inevitably draws the attention of the Indonesian National Armed Forces institution. While no official statement from the TNI leadership regarding this specific trial has been released, it is standard protocol for the military to emphasize its commitment to upholding discipline and professional conduct among its ranks. Instances of misconduct by individual members are typically presented as isolated incidents that do not reflect the institution’s values, often followed by assurances of a fair and transparent legal process within the military justice system. This stance is crucial for maintaining public trust and the institution’s reputation.

Legal counsel for both the prosecution and defense would naturally maintain a professional distance, refraining from commenting on ongoing proceedings outside the courtroom. However, it can be inferred that the prosecution would be focused on establishing the facts of the assault, presenting evidence of injuries, and leveraging witness testimonies like Kalla’s to prove the guilt of the accused TNI member. The defense, on the other hand, would likely challenge the evidence, question witness credibility, or present mitigating circumstances, potentially arguing for a lesser charge or acquittal.

Broader Impact and Implications

The Zaskia Adya Mecca employee assault case carries several significant implications, transcending the immediate legal outcome:

• Accountability of TNI Personnel: The trial reinforces the principle that members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces are not above the law. While they are tried in military courts, the expectation for justice and accountability remains high, especially in cases involving harm to civilians. Public interest in such cases often serves as a barometer for the effectiveness and transparency of the military justice system.
• Celebrity Influence and Case Visibility: Zaskia Adya Mecca’s celebrity status ensures that this case receives considerable media attention, which can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it can bring increased scrutiny and pressure for a fair trial, potentially preventing undue influence or delays. On the other hand, it can also create a media circus that might inadvertently add stress to those involved, particularly a child witness. However, the overall effect is often a heightened public awareness of legal processes and the rights of victims.
• Child Witness Protection Protocols: Kalla Madani’s testimony serves as a practical example of how Indonesian law attempts to balance the need for evidence with the protection of children. The case highlights the importance of sensitive court procedures, the role of parental support, and the legal framework designed to safeguard minors during stressful legal proceedings. It can contribute to public understanding and potentially lead to further refinements in these protocols.
• Justice for Victims: At its core, the trial is about seeking justice for Faisal Handri. The outcome will have profound implications for him, affirming his rights as a victim and potentially providing a measure of closure and redress. Beyond the individual, a just verdict can reinforce public confidence in the legal system’s ability to protect ordinary citizens from harm, regardless of the perpetrator’s background.
• Precedent and Deterrence: The verdict in this case could set an important precedent for future cases involving TNI members accused of civilian crimes. A robust and fair judgment can act as a deterrent, emphasizing that misconduct will be met with serious legal consequences, thereby promoting greater discipline and adherence to law within the armed forces.

As the trial progresses, the focus will remain on the detailed examination of evidence and testimonies. The next steps will likely involve further witness examinations, the presentation of defense arguments, and ultimately, the final deliberations by the panel of judges. The resolution of this case will not only determine the fate of the accused TNI member but also leave a lasting mark on the public discourse surrounding military accountability and the protection of vulnerable witnesses in Indonesia’s justice system. The quiet courage of Kalla Madani, supported by his mother, stands as a poignant reminder of the human element at the heart of complex legal battles.