Indonesia’s persistent and substantial reliance on imported energy remains a critical vulnerability, presenting a formidable challenge to the nation’s long-term energy security and economic resilience. This was the stark assessment delivered by Eddy Soeparno, a member of Commission XII of the House of Representatives (DPR RI), during a recent discussion in Jakarta. Soeparno underscored that this entrenched dependency leaves Indonesia acutely susceptible to the volatile dynamics of global geopolitics, disruptions in international supply chains, and the inherent fluctuations in world energy prices, thereby compromising the reliability and stability of its domestic energy supply.
The Scale of Dependency: A Critical Snapshot
Soeparno detailed the alarming proportions of Indonesia’s energy import burden, highlighting that the nation currently imports approximately 50 percent of its crude oil requirements, 38 percent of its refined fuel (BBM), and a staggering 90 percent of its liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) needs. A significant portion of these crucial energy commodities, particularly LPG, is sourced from the United States, underscoring a concentrated point of reliance. This extensive import dependency, he emphasized, represents a monumental task for policymakers, especially in an era defined by escalating global uncertainties and complex international relations.
"We are still importing 50 percent of our crude oil, 38 percent of our refined fuel, and around 90 percent of our LPG still comes from the United States," Soeparno reiterated, emphasizing the scale of the challenge. This reliance on external sources not only creates an economic drain but also ties Indonesia’s energy fate to the geopolitical whims and market forces far beyond its immediate control.
Historical Context and Evolving Energy Landscape
Indonesia’s journey from an oil-exporting nation and a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to a net oil importer in 2004 marks a significant pivot in its energy narrative. This transformation was driven by a combination of factors: burgeoning domestic demand fueled by rapid economic growth and a rising population, coupled with declining production from aging oil fields and insufficient investment in exploration and development of new reserves. The nation’s energy consumption has continued its upward trajectory, with projections indicating further increases in demand across all sectors – industrial, commercial, transport, and residential – placing immense pressure on existing supply mechanisms.
The global energy landscape has concurrently undergone profound shifts. Geopolitical flashpoints, such as the conflict in Ukraine, tensions in the Middle East, and disruptions to major shipping routes like the Red Sea, have repeatedly demonstrated the fragility of global energy supply chains. These events trigger sharp spikes in crude oil and natural gas prices, directly impacting importing nations. For Indonesia, these external shocks translate into increased costs for subsidies, higher inflation, and potential strain on the state budget and balance of payments, directly affecting the welfare of its citizens.
Shifting the Paradigm: From Availability to Reliability
Soeparno argued that the traditional understanding of energy security, which primarily focused on the mere availability of energy to meet national demand, is no longer adequate. He posited that the paradigm must evolve to encompass the reliability of supply. In a world characterized by rapidly changing geopolitical constellations, regional conflicts, and dynamic international trade relations, ensuring the uninterrupted and stable flow of energy has become as critical as the sheer volume of energy available.
"When we talk about energy security, it is no longer about the availability of supply, but the reliability of supply. What we are discussing is how to ensure energy supply remains reliable amidst rapidly changing global conditions," stated Soeparno, who also serves as a Deputy Speaker of the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR). This shift in perspective necessitates a comprehensive re-evaluation of national energy strategies, moving beyond short-term fixes to long-term, resilient solutions.
Implications of High Import Dependency
The high degree of reliance on energy imports exposes Indonesia to a multitude of risks:
- Economic Vulnerability: Global price volatility directly impacts the state budget through increased fuel and LPG subsidies. When international prices surge, the government often has to absorb a significant portion of the cost to shield consumers, leading to budget deficits and diverting funds from other critical development sectors. This also negatively affects the trade balance, as energy imports constitute a substantial portion of the import bill.
- Geopolitical Exposure: As a major importer, Indonesia’s energy supply can be influenced by the foreign policy decisions of exporting nations or by conflicts in key transit regions. This reduces the nation’s strategic autonomy and makes it susceptible to external pressures.
- Supply Chain Disruptions: Any major disruption to international shipping lanes, natural disasters affecting production facilities, or even cyberattacks on critical infrastructure can sever supply lines, leading to domestic shortages, panic buying, and economic paralysis.
- National Resilience: A nation heavily dependent on external energy sources is inherently less resilient in times of crisis. The ability to maintain essential services, support industrial operations, and ensure public welfare hinges on a stable and secure energy supply.
Government Initiatives and the Path Forward
Recognizing these vulnerabilities, Soeparno strongly advocated for an accelerated development of domestic energy sources. This multi-pronged approach involves several key strategies:
-
Boosting Domestic Oil and Gas Production: Despite being a net importer, Indonesia still possesses significant undeveloped oil and gas reserves. Efforts must be intensified to attract investment in exploration and production, particularly in deepwater and frontier areas, and to optimize production from existing fields using enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques. Streamlining licensing and improving the investment climate are crucial for this.
-
Developing Bioenergy: Indonesia, with its vast agricultural resources, holds immense potential for bioenergy. Programs like the mandatory biodiesel blending (currently B35, aiming for B40) utilize palm oil as a feedstock, reducing diesel imports. Further development of bioethanol and other forms of biomass energy can diversify the energy mix and create value from agricultural waste.
-
Accelerating Renewable Energy Utilization: The archipelago nation is blessed with abundant renewable energy resources, including geothermal, hydro, solar, and wind power. The government has set ambitious targets for increasing the share of renewable energy in the national energy mix, aiming for 23% by 2025 and achieving Net Zero Emissions by 2060. Accelerating the development of these resources through supportive policies, attractive investment frameworks, and grid infrastructure upgrades is paramount. Projects like large-scale solar farms, pumped-hydro storage, and geothermal power plants are critical components of this strategy.
-
LPG Substitution Programs: Given the exceptionally high import dependency for LPG, innovative substitution programs are essential. This includes promoting the use of dimethyl ether (DME) derived from coal as an alternative cooking fuel, expanding access to piped natural gas for households, and encouraging the shift to induction cooktops powered by electricity. These initiatives aim to gradually reduce household reliance on imported LPG.
-
Enhancing Energy Efficiency and Conservation: Reducing overall energy demand through efficiency measures across all sectors – industrial, commercial, residential, and transport – can significantly ease the pressure on supply. This includes adopting energy-efficient technologies, promoting public transportation, and implementing smart grid solutions.
Broader Impact and Long-Term Vision
The successful implementation of these strategies to strengthen Indonesia’s domestic energy mix will yield profound benefits beyond mere energy security. It will significantly reduce the financial burden on the state budget by lowering energy subsidies, freeing up fiscal space for other development priorities such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare. It will also improve the nation’s trade balance by curbing expensive energy imports, thereby bolstering macroeconomic stability.
Furthermore, a robust domestic energy sector, particularly one with a growing share of renewables, contributes to environmental sustainability and Indonesia’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. It fosters local industries, creates employment opportunities, and enhances technological capabilities within the country. By diversifying its energy sources and strengthening its internal supply chains, Indonesia can significantly improve its position to withstand future global energy shocks, ensuring a more stable, secure, and prosperous future for its citizens. The transition towards a more self-reliant and sustainable energy system is not merely an economic imperative but a cornerstone of national sovereignty and long-term resilience. The urgency of this transformation, as highlighted by Representative Soeparno, cannot be overstated in an increasingly unpredictable world.
