The national flag carrier of Indonesia, PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, currently finds itself at the center of a public policy controversy following the implementation of a new baggage allowance scheme. Rivqy Abdul Halim, a member of Commission VI of the House of Representatives (DPR RI) representing the National Awakening Party (PKB), has officially requested that the airline’s management conduct an immediate review of its transition from a weight-based baggage system to a piece-based system. The policy, which officially took effect on September 1, 2026, has ignited a wave of public frustration, prompting legislative intervention to address potential regulatory discrepancies and consumer protection concerns.
The Shift in Operational Policy
The core of the dispute lies in the fundamental change in how Garuda Indonesia calculates free baggage allowances for its passengers. Historically, the airline operated under a "weight concept," where passengers were allotted a specific total weight allowance—for instance, 20 kilograms—regardless of whether that weight was distributed across one large suitcase or two smaller ones. Under the new "piece concept" (PC) implemented in September 2026, the airline now restricts the number of bags a passenger can check in, while also imposing individual weight limits per piece.
For passengers, this change represents a significant shift in travel logistics. Under the new regime, a passenger might be limited to one piece of luggage not exceeding a specific weight threshold. If a traveler attempts to distribute their belongings across two smaller suitcases that, in total, weigh less than the previous weight-based allowance, they may now face additional baggage fees for the second "piece."
Legislative Scrutiny and Regulatory Conflict
Gus Rivqy, as he is popularly known, has positioned his request for a review on the grounds of both public interest and legal compliance. During a press statement in Jakarta on Thursday, September 10, 2026, the lawmaker argued that the policy change appears to diverge from existing national transportation regulations.
"The rules regarding baggage allowances are clearly stipulated in the Minister of Transportation Regulation Number PM 30 of 2021, which utilizes a weight-based approach rather than a quantity-based approach," Gus Rivqy stated. "Given the volume of feedback from the public expressing that they feel disadvantaged by this new system, I strongly recommend that Garuda Indonesia takes a step back to evaluate the necessity and the legality of this transition."
The crux of the legislative concern is whether an airline’s internal commercial policy can supersede or conflict with the spirit of the Ministry of Transportation’s (Kemenhub) guidelines. Legal analysts suggest that while airlines have the autonomy to determine their commercial strategies, those strategies must remain within the bounds of ministerial decrees designed to protect consumer rights and standardize aviation services across the country.
Chronology of the Baggage Policy Transition
The transition toward the "piece concept" was not an overnight decision but rather a culmination of an industry-wide push toward global standardization.
- Pre-August 2026: Garuda Indonesia operated under the traditional weight-based system, maintaining consistency with regional competitors and domestic regulatory norms.
- Late August 2026: The airline announced its intention to modernize its service model, citing the need for operational efficiency and alignment with international aviation standards, particularly for flights connecting to international hubs.
- September 1, 2026: The new piece-based baggage policy officially goes into effect across the domestic network.
- September 2–9, 2026: Social media channels and customer service portals experience a surge in passenger complaints, with travelers expressing confusion regarding the new limits and frustration over unexpected excess baggage charges.
- September 10, 2026: Commission VI of the DPR RI formally intervenes, with Gus Rivqy calling for a policy review and a dialogue between the airline and government regulators.
Economic and Operational Context
Garuda Indonesia has long contended that the move to a piece-based system is essential for "operational streamlining." In the aviation industry, the piece concept is widely used by international carriers to manage ground handling efficiency, balance aircraft loading, and reduce the time required for baggage handling at transit points. By limiting the number of bags, airlines can predict the volume of luggage more accurately, which in turn optimizes fuel consumption—a critical factor for a company that has undergone significant financial restructuring in recent years.
However, the economic impact on the average Indonesian passenger cannot be ignored. In a domestic market where many travelers utilize air transport for family gatherings, business, and regional trade, baggage is often a necessity rather than a luxury. For the middle-class consumer, the sudden introduction of fees for "additional pieces" of luggage functions as a de facto price hike on air travel. Critics argue that at a time when the aviation sector is still recovering from the post-pandemic economic slump, adding friction to the passenger experience could dampen demand for domestic tourism.
Implications for Airline Service Standards
The situation highlights a growing tension between the drive for global standardization and the realities of the local market. While international carriers have utilized the piece concept for decades, those systems are often supported by high-tier loyalty programs and transparent pricing structures that allow frequent travelers to mitigate the costs.
For Garuda Indonesia, the challenge is to communicate the value proposition of this change. If the airline fails to provide clear justifications or fails to demonstrate that the change improves the passenger experience (such as faster baggage delivery or lower incidences of lost luggage), the move will continue to be perceived as a purely revenue-driven measure.
Official Responses and the Road Ahead
As of the time of writing, Garuda Indonesia has yet to issue a formal revised statement regarding the legislator’s call for a review. In previous communications, the airline’s management has maintained that the policy is subject to ongoing monitoring and that they are open to "adjustments" based on passenger feedback and operational data.
Industry observers suggest that the airline may attempt to bridge the gap by introducing "baggage bundles" or more flexible fare classes that cater to travelers who frequently carry multiple pieces of luggage. Such a move would satisfy the requirement for operational efficiency while alleviating the financial burden on consumers.
The Ministry of Transportation is now expected to play a mediating role. The ministry must determine whether the airline’s piece-based system constitutes a breach of the intent of PM 30/2021 or if it represents a valid commercial innovation that requires a regulatory update. Should the ministry find the airline in violation, Garuda Indonesia may be forced to revert to the weight-based system or implement a hybrid model that ensures no passenger is unfairly penalized for the number of items they carry, provided the total weight remains within the permitted threshold.
Analysis: Balancing Efficiency with Consumer Protection
The incident involving Garuda Indonesia serves as a case study in the complexities of corporate governance within the state-owned enterprise (BUMN) sector. As a national asset, Garuda is expected to be profitable, but it is also expected to serve the public interest.
The backlash against the new baggage policy underscores the sensitivity of the Indonesian public to changes in service costs. For any airline, particularly one with the prestige of Garuda, the "customer experience" is a non-tangible asset that carries significant weight in brand loyalty. If the airline insists on maintaining the piece-based system, it must ensure that the communication strategy is vastly improved. Passengers need clarity on how to pack, how to calculate their costs before arriving at the airport, and what alternatives exist for those who exceed the standard allowance.
Furthermore, the involvement of the DPR RI signifies that this is not merely a technical aviation issue, but a political one. With the parliament now involved, the airline is under pressure to present a comprehensive report on the policy’s impact. Any future decisions will likely be made with an eye toward public perception, as the government is sensitive to any policy that could be construed as increasing the cost of living for the general populace.
Conclusion
The debate surrounding Garuda Indonesia’s baggage policy is far from over. As the airline and the legislative body engage in discussions over the coming weeks, the outcome will likely set a precedent for how state-owned carriers balance operational modernization with domestic consumer protection regulations. For now, passengers are advised to verify their baggage allowances through the official Garuda Indonesia website or mobile application, as the rules are currently in a state of flux and subject to potential regulatory intervention.
Whether the policy remains in its current form or is amended to reflect the preferences of the legislature, the episode serves as a reminder that in the aviation industry, every minor change to baggage policy has a ripple effect that touches millions of passengers. The task for Garuda Indonesia now is to demonstrate that its pursuit of operational efficiency does not come at the expense of the trust and loyalty of its passengers. As the situation develops, the aviation industry will be watching closely to see if the airline chooses to yield to political and public pressure or if it stands by its strategic pivot toward international standards.
